Reasoning Promotes Robustness in Theory of Mind Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16853v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:01:24 GMT
• Title: Reasoning Promotes Robustness in Theory of Mind Tasks
• Authors: Ian B. de Haan, Peter van der Putten, Max van Duijn,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance on Theory of Mind (ToM) tests.<n>This paper examines the behavior of such reasoning models in ToM tasks using novel adaptations of machine psychological experiments and results from established benchmarks.
• Score: 0.26945563448932225
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance on Theory of Mind (ToM) tests, prompting debate about the nature and true performance of the underlying capabilities. At the same time, reasoning-oriented LLMs trained via reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) have achieved notable improvements across a range of benchmarks. This paper examines the behavior of such reasoning models in ToM tasks, using novel adaptations of machine psychological experiments and results from established benchmarks. We observe that reasoning models consistently exhibit increased robustness to prompt variations and task perturbations. Our analysis indicates that the observed gains are more plausibly attributed to increased robustness in finding the correct solution, rather than to fundamentally new forms of ToM reasoning. We discuss the implications of this interpretation for evaluating social-cognitive behavior in LLMs.

Related papers

• Understanding Artificial Theory of Mind: Perturbed Tasks and Reasoning in Large Language Models [10.629439705877054]
  We study whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit genuine Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities.<n>We introduce a handcrafted, richly annotated ToM dataset, including classic and perturbed false belief tasks.<n>We show a steep drop in ToM capabilities under task perturbation for all evaluated LLMs, questioning the notion of any robust form of ToM being present.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T16:24:35Z)
• Beyond Words: Evaluating and Bridging Epistemic Divergence in User-Agent Interaction via Theory of Mind [8.740788873949471]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and are widely applied to both general-purpose and professional tasks.<n>They still struggle to comprehend and respond to the true user needs when intentions and instructions are imprecisely conveyed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T16:01:59Z)
• Do MLLMs Really See It: Reinforcing Visual Attention in Multimodal LLMs [55.61018839017648]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has substantially improved multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on complex reasoning tasks.<n>Existing approaches largely rely on long textual reasoning trajectories and provide limited mechanisms for learning stable visual attention policies.<n>We propose SAYO, a visual reasoning model trained with a reinforcement learning framework that introduces a region-level visual attention-based reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:33:23Z)
• How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns [51.02752099869218]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) display strikingly different generalization behaviors.<n>We introduce a novel benchmark that decomposes reasoning into atomic core skills.<n>We show that RL-tuned models maintain more stable behavioral profiles and resist collapse in reasoning skills, whereas SFT models exhibit sharper drift and overfit to surface patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T08:16:20Z)
• Incentivizing Consistent, Effective and Scalable Reasoning Capability in Audio LLMs via Reasoning Process Rewards [24.40159537923851]
  We develop a principled method for developing robust and scalable reasoning in Audio Large Language Models.<n>We achieve state-of-the-art results on MMAU Test-mini, substantially outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o Audio, and near-human-level performance on MMSU reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T06:18:10Z)
• A Simple "Motivation" Can Enhance Reinforcement Finetuning of Large Reasoning Models [103.88578274567784]
  Motivation-enhanced Reinforcement Finetuning (MeRF) is an intuitive yet effective method enhancing reinforcement finetuning of Large Reasoning Models.<n>MeRF directly injects the reward specification into the prompt, which serves as an in-context motivation for the model to be aware of the optimization objective.<n>MeRF achieves substantial performance gains over RLVR baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T10:37:57Z)
• Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z)
• DEL-ToM: Inference-Time Scaling for Theory-of-Mind Reasoning via Dynamic Epistemic Logic [34.90622503586192]
  Theory-of-Mind (ToM) tasks pose a unique challenge for large language models.<n>We propose DEL-ToM, a framework that improves verifiable ToM reasoning through inference-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T23:52:56Z)
• The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning [56.574829311863446]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been widely recognized for its ability to enhance reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>We demonstrate that CoT and its reasoning variants consistently underperform direct answering across varying model scales and benchmark complexities.<n>Our analysis uncovers a fundamental hybrid mechanism of explicit-implicit reasoning driving CoT's performance in pattern-based ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T13:51:06Z)
• Calibrating Reasoning in Language Models with Internal Consistency [18.24350001344488]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various reasoning tasks.<n>LLMs often generate text with obvious mistakes and contradictions.<n>In this work, we investigate reasoning in LLMs through the lens of internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T02:44:12Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey [25.732397636695882]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown impressive performance on tasks involving reasoning. Despite these successes, the depth of LLMs' reasoning abilities remains uncertain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T11:46:31Z)
• FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions [94.61530480991627]
  Theory of mind evaluations currently focus on testing models using passive narratives that inherently lack interactivity. We introduce FANToM, a new benchmark designed to stress-test ToM within information-asymmetric conversational contexts via question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T00:24:11Z)
• Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models [82.50173296858377]
  Many anecdotal examples were used to suggest newer large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) We investigate the extent of LLMs' N-ToM through an extensive evaluation on 6 tasks and find that while LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, this behavior is far from being robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:14:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.