Prompt Driven Development with Claude Code: Building a Complete TUI Framework for the Ring Programming Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17584v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 20:45:13 GMT
• Title: Prompt Driven Development with Claude Code: Building a Complete TUI Framework for the Ring Programming Language
• Abstract summary: This study presents an empirical analysis of developing a 7420 line Terminal User Interface framework for the Ring programming language.<n>The system was produced through 107 prompts: 21 feature requests, 72 bug fix prompts, 9 prompts sharing information from Ring documentation, 4 prompts providing architectural guidance, and 1 prompt dedicated to generating documentation.<n>Most prompts were short, reflecting a highly iterative workflow in which the human role was limited to specifying requirements, validating behaviour, and issuing corrective prompts without writing any code manually.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used in software development, yet their ability to generate and maintain large, multi module systems through natural language interaction remains insufficiently characterized. This study presents an empirical analysis of developing a 7420 line Terminal User Interface framework for the Ring programming language, completed in roughly ten hours of active work spread across three days using a purely prompt driven workflow with Claude Code, Opus 4.5. The system was produced through 107 prompts: 21 feature requests, 72 bug fix prompts, 9 prompts sharing information from Ring documentation, 4 prompts providing architectural guidance, and 1 prompt dedicated to generating documentation. Development progressed across five phases, with the Window Manager phase requiring the most interaction, followed by complex UI systems and controls expansion. Bug related prompts covered redraw issues, event handling faults, runtime errors, and layout inconsistencies, while feature requests focused primarily on new widgets, window manager capabilities, and advanced UI components. Most prompts were short, reflecting a highly iterative workflow in which the human role was limited to specifying requirements, validating behaviour, and issuing corrective prompts without writing any code manually. The resulting framework includes a complete windowing subsystem, event driven architecture, interactive widgets, hierarchical menus, grid and tree components, tab controls, and a multi window desktop environment. By combining quantitative prompt analysis with qualitative assessment of model behaviour, this study provides empirical evidence that modern LLMs can sustain architectural coherence and support the construction of production grade tooling for emerging programming languages, highlighting prompt driven development as a viable methodology within software engineering practice.

Related papers

• MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding [83.0805548642958]
  MTAC-IFBench is a comprehensive benchmark for instruction-following in software development.<n>It features multi-turn progressive software development instructions with diverse constraints spanning 6 primary and 18 secondary categories.<n>MTAC-IFBench identifies significant deficiencies in existing code agents in multi-turn instruction-following, with their performance degrading rapidly as the interaction session grows longer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T03:57:37Z)
• GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents [153.49229978057207]
  We present GLM-5V-Turbo, a step toward native foundation models for multimodal agents.<n>This report summarizes the main improvements behind GLM-5V-Turbo across model design, multimodal training, reinforcement learning, toolchain expansion, and integration with agent frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T14:49:37Z)
• A Lightweight Modular Framework for Constructing Autonomous Agents Driven by Large Language Models: Design, Implementation, and Applications in AgentForge [1.932555230783329]
  Lightweight, open-source Python framework designed to democratize the construction of LLM-driven autonomous agents.<n>AgentForge introduces three key innovations: (1) a composable skill abstraction that enables fine-grained task decomposition with formally defined input-output contracts, (2) a unified backend interface supporting seamless switching between cloud-based APIs and local inference engines, and (3) a declarative YAML-based configuration system that separates agent logic from implementation details.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T20:33:26Z)
• LogicLens: Leveraging Semantic Code Graph to explore Multi Repository large systems [0.2519906683279152]
  We introduce LogicLens, a reactive conversational agent that assists developers in exploring complex software systems.<n>We present the architecture of the system, discuss emergent behaviors, and evaluate its effectiveness on real-world multi-repository scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T15:35:23Z)
• FronTalk: Benchmarking Front-End Development as Conversational Code Generation with Multi-Modal Feedback [92.67587639164908]
  We present FronTalk, a benchmark for front-end code generation with multi-modal feedback.<n>We focus on the front-end development task and curate FronTalk, a collection of 100 multi-turn dialogues.<n> Evaluation of 20 models reveals two key challenges that are under-explored systematically in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T23:28:09Z)
• Prompt-with-Me: in-IDE Structured Prompt Management for LLM-Driven Software Engineering [3.788792284009516]
  We present Prompt-with-Me, a practical solution for structured prompt management embedded directly in the development environment.<n>The system automatically classifies prompts using a four-dimensional taxonomy encompassing intent, author role, software development lifecycle stage, and prompt type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-21T14:24:37Z)
• LoCoBench: A Benchmark for Long-Context Large Language Models in Complex Software Engineering [85.58151741052616]
  LoCoBench is a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate long-context LLMs in realistic, complex software development scenarios.<n>Our benchmark provides 8,000 evaluation scenarios systematically generated across 10 programming languages.<n>LoCoBench introduces 8 task categories that capture essential long-context understanding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T16:55:04Z)
• Context Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Code Assistants Using Elicit, NotebookLM, ChatGPT, and Claude Code [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating code generation and software engineering tasks, yet they often struggle with complex, multi-file projects due to context limitations and knowledge gaps.<n>We propose a novel context engineering workflow that combines multiple AI components: an Intent Translator (GPT-5) for clarifying user requirements, an Elicit-powered semantic literature retrieval for injecting domain knowledge, and a NotebookLM-based document synthesis for contextual understanding, and a Claude Code multi-agent system for code generation and validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-09T14:45:53Z)
• ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language Models [81.12673534903979]
  Tool learning has emerged as a crucial capability for large language models (LLMs) to solve complex real-world tasks through interaction with external tools.<n>We propose ToolCoder, a novel framework that reformulates tool learning as a code generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:42:28Z)
• Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch [77.38414688148006]
  Commit0 is a benchmark that challenges AI agents to write libraries from scratch.<n>Agents are provided with a specification document outlining the library's API as well as a suite of interactive unit tests.<n> Commit0 also offers an interactive environment where models receive static analysis and execution feedback on the code they generate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T18:11:30Z)
• CodeTree: Agent-guided Tree Search for Code Generation with Large Language Models [106.11371409170818]
  Large language models (LLMs) can act as agents with capabilities to self-refine and improve generated code autonomously. We propose CodeTree, a framework for LLM agents to efficiently explore the search space in different stages of the code generation process. Specifically, we adopted a unified tree structure to explicitly explore different coding strategies, generate corresponding coding solutions, and subsequently refine the solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T00:09:54Z)
• CESAR: Automatic Induction of Compositional Instructions for Multi-turn Dialogs [27.092581945832713]
  We propose a novel framework, CESAR, that unifies a large number of dialog tasks in the same format. We apply CESAR on InstructDial, a benchmark for instruction-based dialog tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T06:02:16Z)
• ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development [84.90400377131962]
  ChatDev is a chat-powered software development framework in which specialized agents are guided in what to communicate. These agents actively contribute to the design, coding, and testing phases through unified language-based communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T02:11:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.