LegalMALR:Multi-Agent Query Understanding and LLM-Based Reranking for Chinese Statute Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17692v1
• Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 04:44:56 GMT
• Title: LegalMALR:Multi-Agent Query Understanding and LLM-Based Reranking for Chinese Statute Retrieval
• Authors: Yunhan Li, Mingjie Xie, Gaoli Kang, Zihan Gong, Gengshen Wu, Min Yang,
• Abstract summary: Statute retrieval is essential for legal assistance and judicial decision support.<n>Real-world legal queries are often implicit, multi-issue, and expressed in colloquial or underspecified forms.<n>We present LegalMALR, a retrieval framework that integrates a Multi-Agent Query Understanding System with a zero-shot large-language-generated reranking module.
• Score: 10.997604609194033
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Statute retrieval is essential for legal assistance and judicial decision support, yet real-world legal queries are often implicit, multi-issue, and expressed in colloquial or underspecified forms. These characteristics make it difficult for conventional retrieval-augmented generation pipelines to recover the statutory elements required for accurate retrieval. Dense retrievers focus primarily on the literal surface form of the query, whereas lightweight rerankers lack the legal-reasoning capacity needed to assess statutory applicability. We present LegalMALR, a retrieval framework that integrates a Multi-Agent Query Understanding System (MAS) with a zero-shot large-language-model-based reranking module (LLM Reranker). MAS generates diverse, legally grounded reformulations and conducts iterative dense retrieval to broaden candidate coverage. To stabilise the stochastic behaviour of LLM-generated rewrites, we optimise a unified MAS policy using Generalized Reinforcement Policy Optimization(GRPO). The accumulated candidate set is subsequently evaluated by the LLM Reranker, which performs natural-language legal reasoning to produce the final ranking. We further construct CSAID, a dataset of 118 difficult Chinese legal queries annotated with multiple statutory labels, and evaluate LegalMALR on both CSAID and the public STARD benchmark. Experiments show that LegalMALR substantially outperforms strong Retrieval-augmented generation(RAG) baselines in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining multi-perspective query interpretation, reinforcement-based policy optimisation, and large-model reranking for statute retrieval.

Related papers

• ReCALL: Recalibrating Capability Degradation for MLLM-based Composed Image Retrieval [64.14282916266998]
  Composed Image Retrieval aims to retrieve target images based on a hybrid query comprising a reference image and a modification text.<n>We propose ReCALL, a model-agnostic framework that follows a diagnose-generate-refine pipeline.<n>Experiments on CIRR and FashionIQ show that ReCALL consistently recalibrates degraded capabilities and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T04:52:54Z)
• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agent for Trustworthy Legal Question Answering in Judicial Forensics [30.232667436008978]
  We present a hybrid legal QA agent tailored for judicial settings.<n>It integrates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with multi-model ensembling to deliver reliable, auditable, and continuously updatable counsel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T15:30:58Z)
• Rethinking On-policy Optimization for Query Augmentation [49.87723664806526]
  We present the first systematic comparison of prompting-based and RL-based query augmentation across diverse benchmarks.<n>We introduce a novel hybrid method, On-policy Pseudo-document Query Expansion (OPQE), which learns to generate a pseudo-document that maximizes retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T04:16:28Z)
• Universal Legal Article Prediction via Tight Collaboration between Supervised Classification Model and LLM [42.11889345473452]
  Legal Article Prediction (LAP) is a critical task in legal text classification.<n>We propose Uni-LAP, a universal framework for legal article prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T09:42:20Z)
• Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
  ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Segment First, Retrieve Better: Realistic Legal Search via Rhetorical Role-Based Queries [3.552993426200889]
  TraceRetriever mirrors real-world legal search by operating with limited case information.<n>Our pipeline integrates BM25, Vector Database, and Cross-Encoder models, combining initial results through Reciprocal Rank Fusion.<n> Rhetorical annotations are generated using a Hierarchical BiLSTM CRF classifier trained on Indian judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:49:33Z)
• Augmented Question-guided Retrieval (AQgR) of Indian Case Law with LLM, RAG, and Structured Summaries [0.0]
  This paper proposes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to facilitate the retrieval of relevant cases.<n>Our approach combines Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with structured summaries optimized for Indian case law.<n>The system generates targeted legal questions based on factual scenarios to identify relevant case law more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T05:24:44Z)
• Evaluating LLM-based Approaches to Legal Citation Prediction: Domain-specific Pre-training, Fine-tuning, or RAG? A Benchmark and an Australian Law Case Study [9.30538764385435]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong potential across legal tasks, yet the problem of legal citation prediction remains under-explored.<n>We introduce the AusLaw Citation Benchmark, a real-world dataset comprising 55k Australian legal instances and 18,677 unique citations.<n>We then conduct a systematic benchmarking across a range of solutions.<n>Results show that neither general nor law-specific LLMs suffice as stand-alone solutions, with performance near zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T07:46:14Z)
• JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
  We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance. We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods. In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.