Structural Gender Bias in Credit Scoring: Proxy Leakage

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18342v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:29:45 GMT
• Title: Structural Gender Bias in Credit Scoring: Proxy Leakage
• Abstract summary: This study provides a comprehensive audit of structural gender bias within the Taiwan Credit Default dataset.<n>Despite the removal of explicit protected attributes, our results demonstrate that gendered predictive signals remain deeply embedded within non-sensitive features.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As financial institutions increasingly adopt machine learning for credit risk assessment, the persistence of algorithmic bias remains a critical barrier to equitable financial inclusion. This study provides a comprehensive audit of structural gender bias within the Taiwan Credit Default dataset, specifically challenging the prevailing doctrine of "fairness through blindness." Despite the removal of explicit protected attributes and the application of industry standard fairness interventions, our results demonstrate that gendered predictive signals remain deeply embedded within non-sensitive features. Utilizing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), we identify that variables such as Marital Status, Age, and Credit Limit function as potent proxies for gender, allowing models to maintain discriminatory pathways while appearing statistically fair. To mathematically quantify this leakage, we employ an adversarial inverse modeling framework. Our findings reveal that the protected gender attribute can be reconstructed from purely non-sensitive financial features with an ROC AUC score of 0.65, demonstrating that traditional fairness audits are insufficient for detecting implicit structural bias. These results advocate for a shift from surface-level statistical parity toward causal-aware modeling and structural accountability in financial AI.

Related papers

• Counterfactual Methods for Detecting Unfairness in Anti-Money Laundering Algorithms [37.131058866458964]
  The application of machine learning-based predictive algorithms to Anti-Money Laundering has grown rapidly.<n>These algorithms are typically trained on transactional data and on sensitive client information.<n>Despite this, AML detection systems remain largely underexplored from a fairness perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T13:57:21Z)
• From Accuracy to Auditability: A Survey of Determinism in Financial AI Systems [16.784964226963744]
  Machine learning in regulated financial environments exposes critical vulnerabilities in algorithmic vulnerabilities.<n>Deep neural networks and Generative AI have introduced mechanical nondeterminism rooted in hardware and architecture.<n>This survey provides a systems perspective on failures across three modalities now dominant in financial AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T17:46:38Z)
• Reliable and Reproducible Demographic Inference for Fairness in Face Analysis [63.46525489354455]
  We propose a fully reproducible DAI pipeline that replaces conventional end-to-end training with a modular transfer learning approach.<n>We audit this pipeline across three dimensions: accuracy, fairness, and a newly introduced notion of robustness, defined via intra-identity consistency.<n>Our results show that the proposed method outperforms strong baselines, particularly on ethnicity, which is the more challenging attribute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T12:22:02Z)
• Enhancing Credit Risk Prediction: A Meta-Learning Framework Integrating Baseline Models, LASSO, and ECOC for Superior Accuracy [7.254744067646655]
  This research proposes a comprehensive meta-learning framework that synthesizes multiple complementary models.<n>We implement Permutation Feature Importance analysis for each prediction class across all constituent models.<n>Results demonstrate that our framework significantly enhances the accuracy of financial entity classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:09:04Z)
• Mitigating Bias in Facial Recognition Systems: Centroid Fairness Loss Optimization [9.537960917804993]
  societal demand for fair AI systems has put pressure on the research community to develop predictive models that meet new fairness criteria.<n>In particular, the variability of the errors made by certain Facial Recognition (FR) systems across specific segments of the population compromises the deployment of the latter.<n>We propose a novel post-processing approach to improve the fairness of pre-trained FR models by optimizing a regression loss which acts on centroid-based scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-27T22:17:44Z)
• KACDP: A Highly Interpretable Credit Default Prediction Model [2.776411854233918]
  This paper introduces a method based on Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs)<n>KANs is a new type of neural network architecture with learnable activation functions and no linear weights.<n>Experiments show that the KACDP model outperforms mainstream credit default prediction models in performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T12:58:03Z)
• The Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models [91.86718720024825]
  We center transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse identities to investigate how alignment procedures interact with pre-existing gender-diverse bias.<n>Our findings reveal that DPO-aligned models are particularly sensitive to supervised finetuning.<n>We conclude with recommendations tailored to DPO and broader alignment practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T06:50:50Z)
• GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models [73.23743278545321]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but have also been observed to magnify societal biases.<n>GenderCARE is a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T15:35:46Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Models [52.52955281662332]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases.<n>FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance.<n>This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Thinking Racial Bias in Fair Forgery Detection: Models, Datasets and Evaluations [63.52709761339949]
  We first contribute a dedicated dataset called the Fair Forgery Detection (FairFD) dataset, where we prove the racial bias of public state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.<n>We design novel metrics including Approach Averaged Metric and Utility Regularized Metric, which can avoid deceptive results.<n>We also present an effective and robust post-processing technique, Bias Pruning with Fair Activations (BPFA), which improves fairness without requiring retraining or weight updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:53:18Z)
• The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models [0.0]
  In credit markets, screening algorithms aim to discriminate between good-type and bad-type borrowers. This can be unintentional and originate from the training dataset or from the model itself. We show how to formally test the algorithmic fairness of scoring models and how to identify the variables responsible for any lack of fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T14:20:40Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.