High-quality data augmentation for code comment classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19383v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:14:56 GMT
• Title: High-quality data augmentation for code comment classification
• Authors: Thomas Borsani, Andrea Rosani, Giuseppe Di Fatta,
• Abstract summary: Since comments are in natural language, they present challenges for machine-based code understanding.<n>Existing datasets for this task suffer from size limitations and class imbalance.<n>We introduce new synthetic oversampling and augmentation techniques based on high-quality data generation to enhance the NLBSE'26 challenge datasets.
• Score: 0.48429188360918735
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Code comments serve a crucial role in software development for documenting functionality, clarifying design choices, and assisting with issue tracking. They capture developers' insights about the surrounding source code, serving as an essential resource for both human comprehension and automated analysis. Nevertheless, since comments are in natural language, they present challenges for machine-based code understanding. To address this, recent studies have applied natural language processing (NLP) and deep learning techniques to classify comments according to developers' intentions. However, existing datasets for this task suffer from size limitations and class imbalance, as they rely on manual annotations and may not accurately represent the distribution of comments in real-world codebases. To overcome this issue, we introduce new synthetic oversampling and augmentation techniques based on high-quality data generation to enhance the NLBSE'26 challenge datasets. Our Synthetic Quality Oversampling Technique and Augmentation Technique (Q-SYNTH) yield promising results, improving the base classifier by $2.56\%$.

Related papers

• Readability-Robust Code Summarization via Meta Curriculum Learning [53.44612630063336]
  In the real world, code is often poorly structured or obfuscated, significantly degrading model performance.<n>We propose RoFTCodeSum, a novel fine-tuning method that enhances the robustness of code summarization against poorly readable code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T02:38:24Z)
• Code Review Without Borders: Evaluating Synthetic vs. Real Data for Review Recommendation [37.86790434630698]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to translate code changes from well-resourced languages into equivalent changes in underrepresented or emerging languages.<n>We compare the performance of these models against models trained on real labelled data.<n>This approach provides a scalable pathway to extend automated code review capabilities to rapidly evolving technology stacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T05:17:14Z)
• Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are transforming synthetic training data generation in both natural language and code domains.<n>We highlight key techniques such as prompt-based generation, retrieval-augmented pipelines, and iterative self-refinement.<n>We discuss the accompanying challenges, including factual inaccuracies in generated text, insufficient stylistic or distributional realism, and risks of bias amplification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T08:34:03Z)
• Bridging LLM-Generated Code and Requirements: Reverse Generation technique and SBC Metric for Developer Insights [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel scoring mechanism called the SBC score.<n>It is based on a reverse generation technique that leverages the natural language generation capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Unlike direct code analysis, our approach reconstructs system requirements from AI-generated code and compares them with the original specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T01:12:11Z)
• SnipGen: A Mining Repository Framework for Evaluating LLMs for Code [51.07471575337676]
  Language Models (LLMs) are trained on extensive datasets that include code repositories.<n> evaluating their effectiveness poses significant challenges due to the potential overlap between the datasets used for training and those employed for evaluation.<n>We introduce SnipGen, a comprehensive repository mining framework designed to leverage prompt engineering across various downstream tasks for code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:28:15Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Curated Code Reviews [2.5944208050492183]
  In code review, generating structured and relevant comments is crucial for identifying code issues and facilitating accurate code changes.<n>Existing code review datasets are often noisy and unrefined, posing limitations to the learning potential of AI models.<n>We propose a curation pipeline designed to enhance the quality of the largest publicly available code review dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T18:15:09Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• Code Needs Comments: Enhancing Code LLMs with Comment Augmentation [91.52444946362547]
  We introduce a novel data augmentation method that generates comments for existing code, coupled with a data filtering strategy that filters out code data poorly correlated with natural language. We conducted experiments on three code-focused Large Language Models and observed consistent improvements in performance on two widely-used programming skill benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T13:56:38Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• Leveraging Generative AI: Improving Software Metadata Classification with Generated Code-Comment Pairs [0.0]
  In software development, code comments play a crucial role in enhancing code comprehension and collaboration. This research paper addresses the challenge of objectively classifying code comments as "Useful" or "Not Useful" We propose a novel solution that harnesses contextualized embeddings, particularly BERT, to automate this classification process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T12:09:43Z)
• Tram: A Token-level Retrieval-augmented Mechanism for Source Code Summarization [76.57699934689468]
  We propose a fine-grained Token-level retrieval-augmented mechanism (Tram) on the decoder side to enhance the performance of neural models. To overcome the challenge of token-level retrieval in capturing contextual code semantics, we also propose integrating code semantics into individual summary tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:02:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.