Strong Reasoning Isn't Enough: Evaluating Evidence Elicitation in Interactive Diagnosis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19773v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:36:35 GMT
• Title: Strong Reasoning Isn't Enough: Evaluating Evidence Elicitation in Interactive Diagnosis
• Authors: Zhuohan Long, Zhijie Bao, Zhongyu Wei,
• Abstract summary: Interactive medical consultation requires an agent to proactively elicit missing clinical evidence under uncertainty.<n>Existing evaluations largely remain static or outcome-centric, neglecting the evidence-gathering process.<n>We propose an interactive evaluation framework that explicitly models the consultation process using a simulated patient and a revsimulated reporter grounded in atomic evidences.
• Score: 29.630872344186873
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Interactive medical consultation requires an agent to proactively elicit missing clinical evidence under uncertainty. Yet existing evaluations largely remain static or outcome-centric, neglecting the evidence-gathering process. In this work, we propose an interactive evaluation framework that explicitly models the consultation process using a simulated patient and a \rev{simulated reporter} grounded in atomic evidences. Based on this representation, we introduce Information Coverage Rate (ICR) to quantify how completely an agent uncovers necessary evidence during interaction. To support systematic study, we build EviMed, an evidence-based benchmark spanning diverse conditions from common complaints to rare diseases, and evaluate 10 models with varying reasoning abilities. We find that strong diagnostic reasoning does not guarantee effective information collection, and this insufficiency acts as a primary bottleneck limiting performance in interactive settings. To address this, we propose REFINE, a strategy that leverages diagnostic verification to guide the agent in proactively resolving uncertainties. Extensive experiments demonstrate that REFINE consistently outperforms baselines across diverse datasets and facilitates effective model collaboration, enabling smaller agents to achieve superior performance under strong reasoning supervision. Our code can be found at https://github.com/NanshineLoong/EID-Benchmark .

Related papers

• Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verification [60.18369393468405]
  Existing verifiers usually underperform owing to a lack of domain knowledge and limited calibration.<n>GLEAN compiles expert-curated protocols into trajectory-informed, well-calibrated correctness signals.<n>We empirically validate GLEAN with agentic clinical diagnosis across three diseases from the MIMIC-IV dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T09:36:43Z)
• CARE: Towards Clinical Accountability in Multi-Modal Medical Reasoning with an Evidence-Grounded Agentic Framework [29.22693846221723]
  We introduce CARE, advancing Clinical Accountability in multi-modal medical Reasoning with an Evidence-grounded agentic framework.<n> CARE decomposes the task into coordinated sub-modules to reduce shortcut learning and hallucination.<n>Our CARE-Flow improves average accuracy by 10.9% over the same size (10B) state-of-the-art (SOTA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T08:38:37Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• AgentEHR: Advancing Autonomous Clinical Decision-Making via Retrospective Summarization [28.032865974227875]
  RetroSum is a framework that unifies a retrospective summarization mechanism with an evolving experience strategy.<n>It achieves performance gains of up to 29.16% over competitive baselines, while significantly decreasing total interaction errors by up to 92.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:48:04Z)
• Learning to Seek Evidence: A Verifiable Reasoning Agent with Causal Faithfulness Analysis [10.749786847079163]
  Explanations for AI models in high-stakes domains like medicine often lack verifiability, which can hinder trust.<n>We propose an interactive agent that produces explanations through an auditable sequence of actions.<n>This policy is optimized using reinforcement learning, resulting in a model that is both efficient and generalizable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T10:21:35Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• Benchmarking and Mitigate Sycophancy in Medical Vision-Language Models [21.353225217216252]
  Vision language models often exhibit sycophantic behavior prioritizing alignment with user phrasing social cues or perceived authority over evidence based reasoning.<n>This study evaluate clinical sycophancy in medical visual question answering through a novel clinically grounded benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T07:02:22Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.03671205298294]
  Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability.<n>This work first proposes a Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought dataset, in which the process of producing an answer is preceded by a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z)
• AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments [2.567146936147657]
  We introduce AgentClinic, a multimodal agent benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLM) in simulated clinical environments.<n>We find that solving MedQA problems in the sequential decision-making format of AgentClinic is considerably more challenging, resulting in diagnostic accuracies that can drop to below a tenth of the original accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T17:38:53Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.