Whether We Care, How We Reason: The Dual Role of Anthropomorphism and Moral Foundations in Robot Abuse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19826v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:34:31 GMT
• Title: Whether We Care, How We Reason: The Dual Role of Anthropomorphism and Moral Foundations in Robot Abuse
• Abstract summary: This study examined how anthropomorphic levels and moral foundations shape reactions to robot abuse.<n>Results revealed that anthropomorphism determines whether people extend moral consideration to robots, while moral foundations shape how they reason about such consideration.
• Score: 10.376222111441399
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As robots become increasingly integrated into daily life, understanding responses to robot mistreatment carries important ethical and design implications. This mixed-methods study (N = 201) examined how anthropomorphic levels and moral foundations shape reactions to robot abuse. Participants viewed videos depicting physical mistreatment of robots varying in humanness (Spider, Twofoot, Humanoid) and completed measures assessing moral foundations, anger, and social distance. Results revealed that anthropomorphism determines whether people extend moral consideration to robots, while moral foundations shape how they reason about such consideration. Qualitative analysis revealed distinct reasoning patterns: low-progressivism individuals employed character-based judgments, while high-progressivism individuals engaged in future-oriented moral deliberation. Findings offer implications for robot design and policy communication.

Related papers

• The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers [2.5782420501870287]
  The quest to align machine behavior with human values raises fundamental questions about the moral frameworks that should govern AI decision-making.<n>We show that people apply meaningfully different moral standards to AI systems, to humans acting in the same situation, and to the humans who design them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T08:12:34Z)
• The Influence of Human-like Appearance on Expected Robot Explanations [6.624649712286118]
  A robot's appearance is a known factor influencing user's mental model and human-robot interaction.<n>This study investigates whether and to what extent the human-like appearance of robots elicits anthropomorphism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T17:40:18Z)
• Designing for Difference: How Human Characteristics Shape Perceptions of Collaborative Robots [8.095309110037315]
  Antisocial robot behavior was consistently rated as the lowest, while collaboration with aged individuals elicited more sensitive evaluations.<n>These findings suggest that both human characteristics and interaction paradigms influence the perceived acceptability of collaborative robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T11:36:08Z)
• Social Robots for People with Dementia: A Literature Review on Deception from Design to Perception [12.140026676198401]
  We identify four key design cue categories that may influence deceptive impressions.<n>People with dementia often attribute biological, social, and mental capacities to robots.<n>Existing definitions of robotic deception often rest on philosophical or behaviorist premises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T17:12:40Z)
• HumanoidBench: Simulated Humanoid Benchmark for Whole-Body Locomotion and Manipulation [50.616995671367704]
  We present a high-dimensional, simulated robot learning benchmark, HumanoidBench, featuring a humanoid robot equipped with dexterous hands. Our findings reveal that state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms struggle with most tasks, whereas a hierarchical learning approach achieves superior performance when supported by robust low-level policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T17:45:44Z)
• Aligning Robot and Human Representations [50.070982136315784]
  We argue that current representation learning approaches in robotics should be studied from the perspective of how well they accomplish the objective of representation alignment. We mathematically define the problem, identify its key desiderata, and situate current methods within this formalism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T18:59:55Z)
• Robots with Different Embodiments Can Express and Influence Carefulness in Object Manipulation [104.5440430194206]
  This work investigates the perception of object manipulations performed with a communicative intent by two robots. We designed the robots' movements to communicate carefulness or not during the transportation of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-03T13:26:52Z)
• Understanding a Robot's Guiding Ethical Principles via Automatically Generated Explanations [4.393037165265444]
  We build upon an existing ethical framework to allow users to make suggestions about plans and receive automatically generated contrastive explanations. Results of a user study indicate that the generated explanations help humans to understand the ethical principles that underlie a robot's plan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T22:55:00Z)
• Data-driven emotional body language generation for social robotics [58.88028813371423]
  In social robotics, endowing humanoid robots with the ability to generate bodily expressions of affect can improve human-robot interaction and collaboration. We implement a deep learning data-driven framework that learns from a few hand-designed robotic bodily expressions. The evaluation study found that the anthropomorphism and animacy of the generated expressions are not perceived differently from the hand-designed ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T09:21:39Z)
• Explain yourself! Effects of Explanations in Human-Robot Interaction [10.389325878657697]
  Explanations of robot decisions could affect user perceptions, justify their reliability, and increase trust. The effects on human perceptions of robots that explain their decisions have not been studied thoroughly. This study demonstrates the need for and potential of explainable human-robot interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-09T15:54:27Z)
• Enabling Morally Sensitive Robotic Clarification Requests [2.4505259300326334]
  reflexive generation of clarification requests can lead robots to miscommunicate their moral dispositions. We present a solution by performing moral reasoning on each potential disambiguation of an ambiguous human utterance. We then evaluate our method with a human subjects experiment, the results of which indicate that our approach successfully ameliorates the two identified concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T22:12:35Z)
• Joint Inference of States, Robot Knowledge, and Human (False-)Beliefs [90.20235972293801]
  Aiming to understand how human (false-temporal)-belief-a core socio-cognitive ability unify-would affect human interactions with robots, this paper proposes to adopt a graphical model to the representation of object states, robot knowledge, and human (false-)beliefs. An inference algorithm is derived to fuse individual pg from all robots across multi-views into a joint pg, which affords more effective reasoning inference capability to overcome the errors originated from a single view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T23:02:04Z)
• Human Grasp Classification for Reactive Human-to-Robot Handovers [50.91803283297065]
  We propose an approach for human-to-robot handovers in which the robot meets the human halfway. We collect a human grasp dataset which covers typical ways of holding objects with various hand shapes and poses. We present a planning and execution approach that takes the object from the human hand according to the detected grasp and hand position.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-12T19:58:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.