Visual Generation Unlocks Human-Like Reasoning through Multimodal World Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19834v1
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:40:07 GMT
- Title: Visual Generation Unlocks Human-Like Reasoning through Multimodal World Models
- Authors: Jialong Wu, Xiaoying Zhang, Hongyi Yuan, Xiangcheng Zhang, Tianhao Huang, Changjing He, Chaoyi Deng, Renrui Zhang, Youbin Wu, Mingsheng Long,
- Abstract summary: Humans construct internal world models and reason by manipulating the concepts within these models.<n>Recent advances in AI approximate such human cognitive abilities, where world models are believed to be embedded within large language models.<n>This paper presents the first principled study of when and how visual generation benefits reasoning.
- Score: 60.543714835980325
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Humans construct internal world models and reason by manipulating the concepts within these models. Recent advances in AI, particularly chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, approximate such human cognitive abilities, where world models are believed to be embedded within large language models. Expert-level performance in formal and abstract domains such as mathematics and programming has been achieved in current systems by relying predominantly on verbal reasoning. However, they still lag far behind humans in domains like physical and spatial intelligence, which require richer representations and prior knowledge. The emergence of unified multimodal models (UMMs) capable of both verbal and visual generation has therefore sparked interest in more human-like reasoning grounded in complementary multimodal pathways, though their benefits remain unclear. From a world-model perspective, this paper presents the first principled study of when and how visual generation benefits reasoning. Our key position is the visual superiority hypothesis: for certain tasks--particularly those grounded in the physical world--visual generation more naturally serves as world models, whereas purely verbal world models encounter bottlenecks arising from representational limitations or insufficient prior knowledge. Theoretically, we formalize internal world modeling as a core component of CoT reasoning and analyze distinctions among different forms of world models. Empirically, we identify tasks that necessitate interleaved visual-verbal CoT reasoning, constructing a new evaluation suite, VisWorld-Eval. Controlled experiments on a state-of-the-art UMM show that interleaved CoT significantly outperforms purely verbal CoT on tasks that favor visual world modeling, but offers no clear advantage otherwise. Together, this work clarifies the potential of multimodal world modeling for more powerful, human-like multimodal AI.
Related papers
- The Trinity of Consistency as a Defining Principle for General World Models [106.16462830681452]
General World Models are capable of learning, simulating, and reasoning about objective physical laws.<n>We propose a principled theoretical framework that defines the essential properties requisite for a General World Model.<n>Our work establishes a principled pathway toward general world models, clarifying both the limitations of current systems and the architectural requirements for future progress.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T16:15:55Z) - Beyond World Models: Rethinking Understanding in AI Models [15.246406031450775]
World models are internal representations that simulate aspects of the external world.<n>Finding evidence of similar representations in AI models might indicate that these models "understand" the world in a human-like way.<n>This paper critically examines whether the world model framework adequately characterizes human-level understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-15T14:45:26Z) - Bridging the Gap Between Multimodal Foundation Models and World Models [10.001347956177879]
We investigate what it takes to bridge the gap between multimodal foundation models and world models.<n>Our approaches incorporate scene graphs, multimodal conditioning and alignment strategies to guide the generation process.<n>We extend these techniques to controllable 4D generation, enabling interactive, editable, and morphable object synthesis over time and space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-04T08:14:20Z) - Can World Models Benefit VLMs for World Dynamics? [59.73433292793044]
We investigate the capabilities when world model priors are transferred into Vision-Language Models.<n>We name our best-performing variant Dynamic Vision Aligner (DyVA)<n>We find DyVA to surpass both open-source and proprietary baselines, achieving state-of-the-art or comparable performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T13:07:05Z) - Critiques of World Models [15.85362493719642]
We argue the primary goal of a world model is to be simulating all actionable possibilities of the real world for purposeful reasoning and acting.<n>We propose a new architecture for a general-purpose world model, based on hierarchical, multi-level, and mixed continuous/discrete representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T16:23:46Z) - Learning Local Causal World Models with State Space Models and Attention [1.5498250598583487]
We show that a SSM can model the dynamics of a simple environment and learn a causal model at the same time.<n>We pave the way for further experiments that lean into the strength of SSMs and further enhance them with causal awareness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-04T11:57:02Z) - Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Models [51.891804790725686]
Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK) is a framework for evaluating language models' understanding of conceptual knowledge underlying world modeling.<n>EWoK-core-1.0 is a dataset of 4,374 items covering 11 world knowledge domains.<n>All tested models perform worse than humans, with results varying drastically across domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-15T17:19:42Z) - Visual cognition in multimodal large language models [12.603212933816206]
Recent advancements have rekindled interest in the potential to emulate human-like cognitive abilities.
This paper evaluates the current state of vision-based large language models in the domains of intuitive physics, causal reasoning, and intuitive psychology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T18:58:34Z) - Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective
Study [117.08431221482638]
Lack of interpretability, robustness, and out-of-distribution generalization are becoming the challenges of the existing visual models.
Inspired by the strong inference ability of human-level agents, recent years have witnessed great effort in developing causal reasoning paradigms.
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this emerging field, attract attention, encourage discussions, bring to the forefront the urgency of developing novel causal reasoning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T02:22:28Z) - DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled
Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models.
Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z) - WenLan 2.0: Make AI Imagine via a Multimodal Foundation Model [74.4875156387271]
We develop a novel foundation model pre-trained with huge multimodal (visual and textual) data.
We show that state-of-the-art results can be obtained on a wide range of downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T12:25:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.