The Role of Social Identity in Shaping Biases Against Minorities in Software Organizations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21259v1
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 04:39:32 GMT
- Title: The Role of Social Identity in Shaping Biases Against Minorities in Software Organizations
- Authors: Sayma Sultana, London Cavaletto, Bianca Trinkenreich, Amiangshu Bosu,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates four distinct forms of bias: lack of career development, stereotyped task selection, unwelcoming environments, and identity attacks.<n>Women were more than three times as likely as men to face career development bias, task selection bias, and an unwelcoming environment.<n>In parallel, individuals from marginalized ethnic backgrounds were disproportionately targeted by identity attacks.
- Score: 5.704788741312527
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While systemic workplace bias is well-documented in non-computing fields, its specific impact on software engineers remains poorly understood. This study addresses that gap by applying Social Identity Theory (SIT) to investigate four distinct forms of bias: lack of career development, stereotyped task selection, unwelcoming environments, and identity attacks. Using a vignette-based survey, we quantified the prevalence of these biases, identified the demographics most affected, assessed their consequences, and explored the motivations behind biased actions. Our results show that career development and task selection biases are the most prevalent forms, with over two-thirds of victims experiencing them multiple times. Women were more than three times as likely as men to face career development bias, task selection bias, and an unwelcoming environment. In parallel, individuals from marginalized ethnic backgrounds were disproportionately targeted by identity attacks. Our analysis also confirms that, beyond gender and race, factors such as age, years of experience, organization size, and geographic location are significant predictors of bias victimization.
Related papers
- Measuring Social Bias in Vision-Language Models with Face-Only Counterfactuals from Real Photos [79.03150233804458]
Real-world images entangle race and gender with correlated factors such as background and clothing, obscuring attribution.<n>We propose a textbfface-only counterfactual evaluation paradigm<n>We generate counterfactual variants by editing only facial attributes related to race and gender, keeping all other visual factors fixed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-11T14:35:06Z) - A Multifaceted View on Discrimination in Software Development Careers [3.1006429989273054]
The State of Devs 2025 survey with 8,717 participants revealed that other forms of discrimination are similarly prevalent but receive less attention.<n>This includes discrimination based on age, political perspective, disabilities, or cognitive differences such as neurodivergence.<n>Our study covers multiple identity facets, including age, gender, race, and disability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-25T23:45:06Z) - Investigating Intersectional Bias in Large Language Models using Confidence Disparities in Coreference Resolution [5.061421107401101]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance, leading to their widespread adoption as decision-support tools in resource-constrained contexts like hiring and admissions.<n>There is, however, scientific consensus that AI systems can reflect and exacerbate societal biases, raising concerns about identity-based harm when used in critical social contexts.<n>In this work, we extend single-axis fairness evaluations to examine intersectional bias, recognizing that when multiple axes of discrimination intersect, they create distinct patterns of disadvantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-09T22:24:40Z) - The Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models [91.86718720024825]
We center transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse identities to investigate how alignment procedures interact with pre-existing gender-diverse bias.<n>Our findings reveal that DPO-aligned models are particularly sensitive to supervised finetuning.<n>We conclude with recommendations tailored to DPO and broader alignment practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T06:50:50Z) - JobFair: A Framework for Benchmarking Gender Hiring Bias in Large Language Models [12.12628747941818]
This paper presents a novel framework for benchmarking hierarchical gender hiring bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) for resume scoring.
We introduce a new construct grounded in labour economics, legal principles, and critiques of current bias benchmarks.
We analyze gender hiring biases in ten state-of-the-art LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T09:15:57Z) - Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation [47.770531682802314]
Even simple prompts could cause T2I models to exhibit conspicuous social bias in generated images.
We present the first extensive survey on bias in T2I generative models.
We discuss how these works define, evaluate, and mitigate different aspects of bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T10:19:05Z) - The Male CEO and the Female Assistant: Evaluation and Mitigation of Gender Biases in Text-To-Image Generation of Dual Subjects [58.27353205269664]
We propose the Paired Stereotype Test (PST) framework, which queries T2I models to depict two individuals assigned with male-stereotyped and female-stereotyped social identities.<n>PST queries T2I models to depict two individuals assigned with male-stereotyped and female-stereotyped social identities.<n>Using PST, we evaluate two aspects of gender biases -- the well-known bias in gendered occupation and a novel aspect: bias in organizational power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-16T21:32:27Z) - Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems.
Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts.
We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z) - Blacks is to Anger as Whites is to Joy? Understanding Latent Affective
Bias in Large Pre-trained Neural Language Models [3.5278693565908137]
"Affective Bias" is biased association of emotions towards a particular gender, race, and religion.
We show the existence of statistically significant affective bias in the PLM based emotion detection systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-21T20:23:09Z) - Toward Understanding Bias Correlations for Mitigation in NLP [34.956581421295]
This work aims to provide a first systematic study toward understanding bias correlations in mitigation.
We examine bias mitigation in two common NLP tasks -- toxicity detection and word embeddings.
Our findings suggest that biases are correlated and present scenarios in which independent debiasing approaches may be insufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-24T22:48:47Z) - Statistical discrimination in learning agents [64.78141757063142]
Statistical discrimination emerges in agent policies as a function of both the bias in the training population and of agent architecture.
We show that less discrimination emerges with agents that use recurrent neural networks, and when their training environment has less bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-21T18:28:57Z) - REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets [64.76453161039973]
REVISE (REvealing VIsual biaSEs) is a tool that assists in the investigation of a visual dataset.
It surfacing potential biases along three dimensions: (1) object-based, (2) person-based, and (3) geography-based.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-16T23:54:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.