Large Language Model Agents Are Not Always Faithful Self-Evolvers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22436v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 01:05:15 GMT
• Title: Large Language Model Agents Are Not Always Faithful Self-Evolvers
• Authors: Weixiang Zhao, Yingshuo Wang, Yichen Zhang, Yang Deng, Yanyan Zhao, Wanxiang Che, Bing Qin, Ting Liu,
• Abstract summary: Self-evolving large language model (LLM) agents continually improve by accumulating and reusing past experience.<n>We present the first systematic investigation of experience faithfulness, the causal dependence of an agent's decisions on the experience it is given.
• Score: 84.08646612111092
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-evolving large language model (LLM) agents continually improve by accumulating and reusing past experience, yet it remains unclear whether they faithfully rely on that experience to guide their behavior. We present the first systematic investigation of experience faithfulness, the causal dependence of an agent's decisions on the experience it is given, in self-evolving LLM agents. Using controlled causal interventions on both raw and condensed forms of experience, we comprehensively evaluate four representative frameworks across 10 LLM backbones and 9 environments. Our analysis uncovers a striking asymmetry: while agents consistently depend on raw experience, they often disregard or misinterpret condensed experience, even when it is the only experience provided. This gap persists across single- and multi-agent configurations and across backbone scales. We trace its underlying causes to three factors: the semantic limitations of condensed content, internal processing biases that suppress experience, and task regimes where pretrained priors already suffice. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about self-evolving methods and underscore the need for more faithful and reliable approaches to experience integration.

Related papers

• Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
  Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z)
• Self-Consolidation for Self-Evolving Agents [51.94826934403236]
  Large language model (LLM) agents operate as static systems, lacking the ability to evolve through lifelong interaction.<n>We propose a novel self-evolving framework for LLM agents that introduces a complementary evolution mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T11:16:07Z)
• InEx: Hallucination Mitigation via Introspection and Cross-Modal Multi-Agent Collaboration [6.103123418191468]
  InEx is a training-free, multi-agent framework designed to autonomously mitigate hallucination.<n>InEx consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving 4%-27% gains on general and hallucination benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T17:59:52Z)
• Agent Learning via Early Experience [93.83579011718858]
  A long-term goal of language agents is to learn and improve through their own experience, ultimately outperforming humans in complex, real-world tasks.<n>Most current agents rely on supervised fine-tuning on expert data, which is challenging to scale and generalizes poorly.<n>We study two strategies of using such data: (1) Implicit world modeling, which uses collected states to ground the policy in environment dynamics; and (2) Self-reflection, where the agent learns from its suboptimal actions to improve reasoning and decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:59:17Z)
• Simulating and Understanding Deceptive Behaviors in Long-Horizon Interactions [18.182800471968132]
  We introduce the first simulation framework for probing and evaluating deception in large language models.<n>We conduct experiments across 11 frontier models, spanning both closed and open-source systems.<n>We find that deception is model-dependent, increases with event pressure, and consistently erodes supervisor trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T02:18:23Z)
• MIRAGE-Bench: LLM Agent is Hallucinating and Where to Find Them [52.764019220214344]
  Hallucinations pose critical risks for large language model (LLM)-based agents.<n>We present MIRAGE-Bench, the first unified benchmark for eliciting and evaluating hallucinations in interactive environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:38:29Z)
• Iterative Experience Refinement of Software-Developing Agents [81.09737243969758]
  Large language models (LLMs) can leverage past experiences to reduce errors and enhance efficiency. This paper introduces the Iterative Experience Refinement framework, enabling LLM agents to refine experiences iteratively during task execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T11:33:49Z)
• Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents [83.34027623428096]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially in software development. We introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework. Experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T13:50:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.