Elderly HealthMag: Systematic Building and Calibrating a Tool for Identifying and Evaluating Senior User Digital Health Software
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22627v1
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 06:36:53 GMT
- Title: Elderly HealthMag: Systematic Building and Calibrating a Tool for Identifying and Evaluating Senior User Digital Health Software
- Authors: Yuqing Xiao, John Grundy, Anuradha Madugalla, Elizabeth Manias,
- Abstract summary: Digital health (DH) software is increasingly deployed to populations where many end users live with one or more health conditions.<n>Yet, DH software development teams frequently operate using implicit, incorrect assumptions about these users.<n>We propose textbftextitHealthMag, a tool inspired by GenderMag to help better elicit, model and evaluate requirements for digital health software.
- Score: 4.640647592836271
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Digital health (DH) software is increasingly deployed to populations where many end users live with one or more health conditions. Yet, DH software development teams frequently operate using implicit, incorrect assumptions about these users, resulting in products that under-serve the specific requirements imposed by their age and health conditions. Consequently, while software may meet clinical objectives on paper, it often fails to be inclusive during actual user interaction. To address this, we propose \textbf{\textit{HealthMag}}, a tool inspired by GenderMag designed to help better elicit, model and evaluate requirements for digital health software. We developed HealthMag through systematic mapping and calibration following the InclusiveMag framework. Furthermore, we integrated this with a calibrated version of an existing AgeMag method to create a dual-lens approach: \textbf{\textit{Elderly HealthMag}}, designed to aid requirements, design and evaluation of mHealth software for senior end users. We demonstrate application and utility of Age HealthMag via cognitive walkthroughs in identifying inclusivity biases in current senior user-oriented digital health applications.
Related papers
- ChroniUXMag: A Persona-Driven Framework for Inclusive mHealth Requirements Engineering [6.574640199180087]
This study introduces ChroniUXMag, a framework for eliciting and analysing inclusivity requirements in mHealth design.<n>Building on InclusiveMag and GenderMag principles, the framework aims to help researchers and practitioners systematically capture and evaluate factors that influence how individuals with chronic conditions perceive, trust, and interact with mHealth systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T22:20:13Z) - LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation [58.25892575437433]
evaluating large language models (LLMs) in medicine is crucial because medical applications require high accuracy with little room for error.<n>We present LLMEval-Med, a new benchmark covering five core medical areas, including 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T15:43:14Z) - MOPI-HFRS: A Multi-objective Personalized Health-aware Food Recommendation System with LLM-enhanced Interpretation [50.309987904297415]
Major food recommendation platforms such as Yelp prioritize users' dietary preferences over the healthiness of their choices.<n>We develop a novel framework, Multi-Objective Personalized Interpretable Health-aware Food Recommendation System (MOPI-HFRS)<n>It provides food recommendations by jointly optimizing the three objectives: user preference, personalized healthiness and nutritional diversity, along with a large language model (LLM)-enhanced reasoning module.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T01:02:09Z) - Designing Adaptive User Interfaces for mHealth Applications Targeting Chronic Disease: A User-Centered Approach [7.014860609693923]
Mobile Health (mHealth) applications have demonstrated considerable potential in supporting chronic disease self-management.<n>They remain under-utilised due to low engagement, limited accessibility, and poor long-term adherence.<n>This paper presents a two-stage study to develop and validate actionable Adaptive User Interfaces (AUIs) for mHealth applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T03:53:52Z) - CAREForMe: Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit Recommendation Framework for
Mental Health [7.553541266741278]
This paper introduces CAREForMe, a contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) recommendation framework for mental health.
CAREForMe harnesses mobile sensing and online learning algorithms with user clustering capability to deliver timely, personalized recommendations.
We showcase CAREForMe's versatility through its implementation across various platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T20:18:25Z) - Benefits and Harms of Large Language Models in Digital Mental Health [40.02859683420844]
Large language models (LLMs) show promise in leading digital mental health to uncharted territory.
This article presents contemporary perspectives on the opportunities and risks posed by LLMs in the design, development, and implementation of digital mental health tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T14:11:10Z) - Redefining Digital Health Interfaces with Large Language Models [69.02059202720073]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose models with the ability to process complex information.
We show how LLMs can provide a novel interface between clinicians and digital technologies.
We develop a new prognostic tool using automated machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T14:18:40Z) - Causally Linking Health Application Data and Personal Information
Management Tools [8.712274718271406]
This paper presents a framework for the integration of diverse data sources, analytic and visualization tools, with inference methods and graphical user interfaces.
Health and well-being applications make little use of the potentially useful contextual information provided by widely used personal information management tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-11T19:22:11Z) - A Review on Knowledge Graphs for Healthcare: Resources, Applications, and Promises [59.4999994297993]
This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of the current state of Healthcare Knowledge Graphs (HKGs)<n>We thoroughly analyzed existing literature on HKGs, covering their construction methodologies, utilization techniques, and applications.<n>The review highlights the potential of HKGs to significantly impact biomedical research and clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T21:51:56Z) - A Comprehensive Picture of Factors Affecting User Willingness to Use
Mobile Health Applications [62.60524178293434]
The aim of this paper is to investigate the factors that influence user acceptance of mHealth apps.
Users' digital literacy has the strongest impact on their willingness to use them, followed by their online habit of sharing personal information.
Users' demographic background, such as their country of residence, age, ethnicity, and education, has a significant moderating effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T08:11:21Z) - The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through
Simulation [81.72197368690031]
We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making.
The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.