Culturally-Grounded Governance for Multilingual Language Models: Rights, Data Boundaries, and Accountable AI Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00497v1
• Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 03:47:30 GMT
• Title: Culturally-Grounded Governance for Multilingual Language Models: Rights, Data Boundaries, and Accountable AI Design
• Authors: Hanjing Shi, Dominic DiFranzo,
• Abstract summary: This paper synthesizes existing evidence on multilingual model behavior, data asymmetries, and sociotechnical harm.<n>We identify three interrelated governance challenges: cultural and linguistic inequities in training data and evaluation practices, misalignment between global deployment and locally situated norms, values, and power structures, and limited accountability mechanisms for addressing harms experienced by marginalized language communities.<n>We argue that culturally grounded governance is essential for ensuring that multilingual language models do not reproduce existing global inequalities under the guise of scale and neutrality.
• Score: 2.5424331328233207
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed across cultural, linguistic, and political contexts, yet existing governance frameworks largely assume English-centric data, homogeneous user populations, and abstract notions of fairness. This creates systematic risks for low-resource languages and culturally marginalized communities, where data practices, model behavior, and accountability mechanisms often fail to align with local norms, rights, and expectations. Drawing on cross-cultural perspectives in human-centered computing and AI governance, this paper synthesizes existing evidence on multilingual model behavior, data asymmetries, and sociotechnical harm, and articulates a culturally grounded governance framework for MLLMs. We identify three interrelated governance challenges: cultural and linguistic inequities in training data and evaluation practices, misalignment between global deployment and locally situated norms, values, and power structures, and limited accountability mechanisms for addressing harms experienced by marginalized language communities. Rather than proposing new technical benchmarks, we contribute a conceptual agenda that reframes multilingual AI governance as a sociocultural and rights based problem. We outline design and policy implications for data stewardship, transparency, and participatory accountability, and argue that culturally grounded governance is essential for ensuring that multilingual language models do not reproduce existing global inequalities under the guise of scale and neutrality.

Related papers

• Challenging the Abilities of Large Language Models in Italian: a Community Initiative [63.94242079171895]
  "Challenging the Abilities of LAnguage Models in ITAlian" (CALAMITA) is a large-scale collaborative benchmarking initiative for Italian.<n>It federates more than 80 contributors from academia, industry, and the public sector to design, document, and evaluate a diverse collection of tasks.<n>We report results for four open-weight LLMs, highlighting systematic strengths and weaknesses across abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T12:50:29Z)
• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• MyCulture: Exploring Malaysia's Diverse Culture under Low-Resource Language Constraints [7.822567458977689]
  MyCulture is a benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) on Malaysian culture.<n>Unlike conventional benchmarks, MyCulture employs a novel open-ended multiple-choice question format without predefined options.<n>We analyze structural bias by comparing model performance on structured versus free-form outputs, and assess language bias through multilingual prompt variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T14:17:43Z)
• CulFiT: A Fine-grained Cultural-aware LLM Training Paradigm via Multilingual Critique Data Synthesis [41.261808170896686]
  CulFiT is a novel training paradigm that leverages multilingual data and fine-grained reward modeling to enhance cultural sensitivity and inclusivity.<n>Our approach synthesizes diverse cultural-related questions, constructs critique data in culturally relevant languages, and employs fine-grained rewards to decompose cultural texts into verifiable knowledge units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T04:08:26Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• Cultural Learning-Based Culture Adaptation of Language Models [70.1063219524999]
  Adapting large language models (LLMs) to diverse cultural values is a challenging task.<n>We present CLCA, a novel framework for enhancing LLM alignment with cultural values based on cultural learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T18:16:26Z)
• Preserving Cultural Identity with Context-Aware Translation Through Multi-Agent AI Systems [0.4218593777811082]
  Language is a cornerstone of cultural identity, yet globalization and the dominance of major languages have placed nearly 3,000 languages at risk of extinction.<n>Existing AI-driven translation models prioritize efficiency but often fail to capture cultural nuances, idiomatic expressions, and historical significance.<n>We propose a multi-agent AI framework designed for culturally adaptive translation in underserved language communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T06:43:59Z)
• From No to Know: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Opportunities for Negation Understanding in Multimodal Foundation Models [48.68342037881584]
  Negation, a linguistic construct conveying absence, denial, or contradiction, poses significant challenges for multilingual multimodal foundation models.<n>We propose a comprehensive taxonomy of negation constructs, illustrating how structural, semantic, and cultural factors influence multimodal foundation models.<n>We advocate for specialized benchmarks, language-specific tokenization, fine-grained attention mechanisms, and advanced multimodal architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:55:13Z)
• Risks of Cultural Erasure in Large Language Models [4.613949381428196]
  We argue for the need of metricizable evaluations of language technologies that interrogate and account for historical power inequities.<n>We probe representations that a language model produces about different places around the world when asked to describe these contexts.<n>We analyze the cultures represented in the travel recommendations produced by a set of language model applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T04:57:50Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.