FinEvo: From Isolated Backtests to Ecological Market Games for Multi-Agent Financial Strategy Evolution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00948v1
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 00:52:01 GMT
- Title: FinEvo: From Isolated Backtests to Ecological Market Games for Multi-Agent Financial Strategy Evolution
- Authors: Mingxi Zou, Jiaxiang Chen, Aotian Luo, Jingyi Dai, Chi Zhang, Dongning Sun, Zenglin Xu,
- Abstract summary: FinEvo is an ecological game formalism for studying the evolutionary dynamics of multi-agent financial strategies.<n>At the individual level, heterogeneous ML-based traders-rule-based, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and large language model (LLM) agents-adapt using signals such as historical prices and external news.<n>At the population level, strategy distributions evolve through three designed mechanisms-selection, innovation, and environmental perturbation-capturing the dynamic forces of real markets.
- Score: 27.042813852171378
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Conventional financial strategy evaluation relies on isolated backtests in static environments. Such evaluations assess each policy independently, overlook correlations and interactions, and fail to explain why strategies ultimately persist or vanish in evolving markets. We shift to an ecological perspective, where trading strategies are modeled as adaptive agents that interact and learn within a shared market. Instead of proposing a new strategy, we present FinEvo, an ecological game formalism for studying the evolutionary dynamics of multi-agent financial strategies. At the individual level, heterogeneous ML-based traders-rule-based, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and large language model (LLM) agents-adapt using signals such as historical prices and external news. At the population level, strategy distributions evolve through three designed mechanisms-selection, innovation, and environmental perturbation-capturing the dynamic forces of real markets. Together, these two layers of adaptation link evolutionary game theory with modern learning dynamics, providing a principled environment for studying strategic behavior. Experiments with external shocks and real-world news streams show that FinEvo is both stable for reproducibility and expressive in revealing context-dependent outcomes. Strategies may dominate, collapse, or form coalitions depending on their competitors-patterns invisible to static backtests. By reframing strategy evaluation as an ecological game formalism, FinEvo provides a unified, mechanism-level protocol for analyzing robustness, adaptation, and emergent dynamics in multi-agent financial markets, and may offer a means to explore the potential impact of macroeconomic policies and financial regulations on price evolution and equilibrium.
Related papers
- MEME: Modeling the Evolutionary Modes of Financial Markets [11.120179118542518]
We introduce MEME, designed to reconstruct market dynamics through the lens of evolving logics.<n>MEME employs a multi-agent extraction module to transform noisy data into high-fidelity Investment Arguments.<n>Experiments on three heterogeneous Chinese stock pools from 2023 to 2025 demonstrate that MEME consistently outperforms seven SOTA baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T13:16:05Z) - Emergence from Emergence: Financial Market Simulation via Learning with Heterogeneous Preferences [3.722808691920657]
We develop a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework in which agents endowed with heterogeneous risk aversion, time discounting, and information access collectively learn trading strategies.<n>The experiment reveals that (i) learning with heterogeneous preferences drives agents to develop strategies aligned with their individual traits, fostering behavioral differentiation and niche specialization within the market, and (ii) the interactions by the differentiated agents are essential for the emergence of realistic market dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-07T12:54:27Z) - QuantEvolve: Automating Quantitative Strategy Discovery through Multi-Agent Evolutionary Framework [5.824247126563122]
QuantEvolve is an evolutionary framework that combines quality- optimization with hypothesis-driven strategy generation.<n>It produces diverse, sophisticated strategies that adapt to both market regime shifts and individual investment needs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T12:22:16Z) - Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading [57.28635022507172]
TiMi is a rationality-driven multi-agent system that architecturally decouples strategy development from minute-level deployment.<n>We propose a two-tier analytical paradigm from macro patterns to micro customization, layered programming design for trading bot implementation, and closed-loop optimization driven by mathematical reflection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T13:08:55Z) - EvoEmo: Towards Evolved Emotional Policies for Adversarial LLM Agents in Multi-Turn Price Negotiation [61.627248012799704]
Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) agents largely overlook the functional role of emotions in such negotiations.<n>We present EvoEmo, an evolutionary reinforcement learning framework that optimize dynamic emotional expression in negotiations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T15:23:58Z) - From Bias to Behavior: Learning Bull-Bear Market Dynamics with Contrastive Modeling [13.039189005779534]
This paper explores the potential of bull and bear regimes in investor-driven market dynamics.<n>We propose the Bias to Behavior from Bull-Bear Dynamics model (B4), a unified framework that embeds temporal price sequences and external contextual signals into a shared latent space.<n>Our model achieves superior performance in predicting market trends and provides interpretable insights into the interplay of biases, investor behaviors, and market dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-12T11:36:26Z) - Predictability Shapes Adaptation: An Evolutionary Perspective on Modes of Learning in Transformers [51.992454203752686]
Transformer models learn in two distinct modes: in-weights learning (IWL) and in-context learning (ICL)<n>We draw inspiration from evolutionary biology's analogous adaptive strategies: genetic encoding and phenotypic plasticity.<n>We experimentally operationalize these dimensions of predictability and investigate their influence on the ICL/IWL balance in Transformers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-14T23:31:17Z) - EPO: Explicit Policy Optimization for Strategic Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [69.55982246413046]
We propose explicit policy optimization (EPO) for strategic reasoning.<n>We train the strategic reasoning model via multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL),utilizing process rewards and iterative self-play.<n>Our findings reveal various collaborative reasoning mechanisms emergent in EPO and its effectiveness in generating novel strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T03:15:55Z) - Deviations from the Nash equilibrium and emergence of tacit collusion in a two-player optimal execution game with reinforcement learning [0.9208007322096533]
We study a scenario in which two autonomous agents learn to liquidate the same asset optimally in the presence of market impact.
Our results show that the strategies learned by the agents deviate significantly from the Nash equilibrium of the corresponding market impact game.
We explore how different levels of market volatility influence the agents' performance and the equilibria they discover.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T16:54:53Z) - Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic
Equilibrium Computation [93.52573037053449]
H-MARL (Hallucinated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning) learns successful equilibrium policies after a few interactions with the environment.
We demonstrate our approach experimentally on an autonomous driving simulation benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T17:24:03Z) - Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep
Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types.
Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing.
We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.