GradingAttack: Attacking Large Language Models Towards Short Answer Grading Ability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00979v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 02:39:51 GMT
• Title: GradingAttack: Attacking Large Language Models Towards Short Answer Grading Ability
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential for automatic short answer grading (ASAG)<n>Their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation raises critical concerns about automatic grading fairness and reliability.<n>We introduce GradingAttack, a fine-grained adversarial attack framework that systematically evaluates the vulnerability of LLM based ASAG models.
• Score: 12.36073220426879
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential for automatic short answer grading (ASAG), significantly boosting student assessment efficiency and scalability in educational scenarios. However, their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation raises critical concerns about automatic grading fairness and reliability. In this paper, we introduce GradingAttack, a fine-grained adversarial attack framework that systematically evaluates the vulnerability of LLM based ASAG models. Specifically, we align general-purpose attack methods with the specific objectives of ASAG by designing token-level and prompt-level strategies that manipulate grading outcomes while maintaining high camouflage. Furthermore, to quantify attack camouflage, we propose a novel evaluation metric that balances attack success and camouflage. Experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that both attack strategies effectively mislead grading models, with prompt-level attacks achieving higher success rates and token-level attacks exhibiting superior camouflage capability. Our findings underscore the need for robust defenses to ensure fairness and reliability in ASAG. Our code and datasets are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GradingAttack.

Related papers

• ATAAT: Adaptive Threat-Aware Adversarial Tuning Framework against Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [11.93174278125059]
  This study investigates backdoor attacks targeting the visual pathway.<n>We identify a core obstacle causing the failure of traditional attack paradigms: "Gradient Interference"<n>We propose an Adaptive Threat-Aware Adrial Tuning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T02:15:10Z)
• Prompt-Unknown Promotion Attacks against LLM-based Sequential Recommender Systems [51.504307822017985]
  Large language model-powered sequential recommender systems (LLM-SRSs) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance.<n>This paper investigates the item promotion attack in LLM-SRSs under a more realistic setting where both the system prompt and victim model are unknown to the attacker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T10:09:26Z)
• ICL-EVADER: Zero-Query Black-Box Evasion Attacks on In-Context Learning and Their Defenses [8.57098009274006]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become a powerful, data-efficient paradigm for text classification using large language models.<n>We introduce ICL-Evader, a novel black-box evasion attack framework that operates under a highly practical zero-query threat model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:50:50Z)
• AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [60.39655329875822]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to interpret natural-language instructions and perform diverse tasks.<n>Despite growing interest in attacking such models, the effectiveness of existing techniques remains unclear.<n>We propose AttackVLA, a unified framework that aligns with the VLA development lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T10:30:46Z)
• Sampling-aware Adversarial Attacks Against Large Language Models [52.30089653615172]
  Existing adversarial attacks typically target harmful responses in single-point greedy generations.<n>We show that for the goal of eliciting harmful responses, repeated sampling of model outputs during the attack prompt optimization.<n>We show that integrating sampling into existing attacks boosts success rates by up to 37% and improves efficiency by up to two orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T16:13:33Z)
• Benchmarking Misuse Mitigation Against Covert Adversaries [80.74502950627736]
  Existing language model safety evaluations focus on overt attacks and low-stakes tasks.<n>We develop Benchmarks for Stateful Defenses (BSD), a data generation pipeline that automates evaluations of covert attacks and corresponding defenses.<n>Our evaluations indicate that decomposition attacks are effective misuse enablers, and highlight stateful defenses as a countermeasure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T17:33:33Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Large Audio Language Models to Audio Injection: An Empirical Study [5.843063647136238]
  This study systematically evaluates five leading LALMs across four attack scenarios.<n>No single model consistently outperforms others across all attack types.<n>A negative correlation between instruction-following capability and robustness suggests models adhering strictly to instructions may be more susceptible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:08:38Z)
• Checkpoint-GCG: Auditing and Attacking Fine-Tuning-Based Prompt Injection Defenses [10.08464073347558]
  We introduce Checkpoint-GCG, a white-box attack against fine-tuning-based defenses.<n>We show Checkpoint-GCG to achieve up to $96%$ attack success rate (ASR) against the strongest defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:43:17Z)
• REINFORCE Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models: An Adaptive, Distributional, and Semantic Objective [57.57786477441956]
  We propose an adaptive and semantic optimization problem over the population of responses.<n>Our objective doubles the attack success rate (ASR) on Llama3 and increases the ASR from 2% to 50% with circuit breaker defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:34:48Z)
• Adversarial Training for Defense Against Label Poisoning Attacks [53.893792844055106]
  Label poisoning attacks pose significant risks to machine learning models.<n>We propose a novel adversarial training defense strategy based on support vector machines (SVMs) to counter these threats.<n>Our approach accommodates various model architectures and employs a projected gradient descent algorithm with kernel SVMs for adversarial training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T13:03:19Z)
• ShieldLearner: A New Paradigm for Jailbreak Attack Defense in LLMs [4.534938642552179]
  ShieldLearner is a novel paradigm that mimics human learning in defense.<n>Through trial and error, it autonomously distills attack signatures into a Pattern Atlas.<n> Adaptive Adversarial Augmentation generates adversarial variations of successfully defended prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T18:47:41Z)
• Enhancing Object Detection Robustness: Detecting and Restoring Confidence in the Presence of Adversarial Patch Attacks [2.963101656293054]
  This study evaluates defense mechanisms for the YOLOv5 model against adversarial patches.<n>We tested several defenses, including Segment and Complete (SAC), Inpainting, and Latent Diffusion Models.<n>Results indicate that adversarial patches reduce average detection confidence by 22.06%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T13:32:48Z)
• Learn from the Past: A Proxy Guided Adversarial Defense Framework with Self Distillation Regularization [53.04697800214848]
  Adversarial Training (AT) is pivotal in fortifying the robustness of deep learning models. AT methods, relying on direct iterative updates for target model's defense, frequently encounter obstacles such as unstable training and catastrophic overfitting. We present a general proxy guided defense framework, LAST' (bf Learn from the Pbf ast)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T13:13:41Z)
• Defending against the Label-flipping Attack in Federated Learning [5.769445676575767]
  Federated learning (FL) provides autonomy and privacy by design to participating peers. The label-flipping (LF) attack is a targeted poisoning attack where the attackers poison their training data by flipping the labels of some examples. We propose a novel defense that first dynamically extracts those gradients from the peers' local updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T12:02:54Z)
• LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategy [82.88724890186094]
  "Learnable attack strategy", dubbed LAS-AT, learns to automatically produce attack strategies to improve the model robustness. Our framework is composed of a target network that uses AEs for training to improve robustness and a strategy network that produces attack strategies to control the AE generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T10:21:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.