Tangent Space Fine-Tuning for Directional Preference Alignment in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01128v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:56:28 GMT
• Title: Tangent Space Fine-Tuning for Directional Preference Alignment in Large Language Models
• Authors: Mete Erdogan,
• Abstract summary: Our goal is to enable large language models to balance human preference dimensions through principled and controllable alignment.<n>We propose Tangent-Space Direct Preference Optimization (TS-DPO), which performs DPO within a locally linear regime to learn per-objective update directions.
• Score: 0.2538209532048867
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Our goal is to enable large language models (LLMs) to balance multiple human preference dimensions; such as helpfulness, safety, and verbosity, through principled and controllable alignment. Existing preference optimization methods, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), collapse feedback into a single scalar reward, fixing one balance among objectives and preventing traversal of the Pareto front. Recent work by Ortiz-Jimenez et al. (2023) showed that fine-tuning can be viewed in a model's tangent space, where linearized updates act as additive vectors that can be composed to jointly perform well on multiple tasks. Building on this formulation, we extend this idea to preference alignment and propose Tangent-Space Direct Preference Optimization (TS-DPO), which performs DPO within this locally linear regime to learn per-objective update directions. These directions can be linearly combined at inference to generate user-specified behaviors without additional optimization. Evaluated on the helpfulness-verbosity trade-off using the HelpSteer and UltraFeedback datasets, TS-DPO achieves broader Pareto-optimal coverage and smoother preference control than scalarized DPO. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) further shows that tangent-space training amplifies canonical directions aligned with distinct preferences, improving disentanglement.

Related papers

• YaPO: Learnable Sparse Activation Steering Vectors for Domain Adaptation [56.35317441010461]
  Yet another Policy Optimization (YaPO) is a textitreference-free method that learns textitsparse steering vectors in the latent space of a Sparse Autoencoder.<n>By optimizing sparse codes, YaPO produces disentangled, interpretable, and efficient steering directions.<n>We show that YaPO converges faster, achieves stronger performance, and exhibits improved training stability compared to dense steering baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T11:10:13Z)
• Linear Preference Optimization: Decoupled Gradient Control via Absolute Regularization [13.97375970293678]
  DPO (Direct Preference Optimization) has become a widely used offline preference optimization algorithm due to its simplicity and training stability.<n>We propose Linear Preference Optimization (LPO), a novel alignment framework featuring three key innovations.<n>First, we introduce gradient decoupling by replacing the log-sigmoid function with an absolute difference loss, thereby isolating the optimization dynamics.<n>Second, we improve stability through an offset constraint combined with a positive regularization term to preserve the chosen response quality.<n>Third, we implement controllable rejection suppression using gradient separation with straightforward estimation and a tunable coefficient that linearly regulates the descent of the rejection probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T10:17:29Z)
• Stable Preference Optimization for LLMs: A Bilevel Approach Beyond Direct Preference Optimization [2.384797824772941]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of DPO's dynamics from a probability evolution perspective.<n>We propose a theoretically grounded bilevel optimization framework that tightly integrate supervised fine-tuning with an enhanced DPO objective a.k.a. stable preference optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T12:57:39Z)
• Multi-Preference Lambda-weighted Listwise DPO for Small-Scale Model Alignment [5.276657230880984]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong generalization across a wide range of language tasks, but often generate outputs that misalign with human preferences.<n>Direct Optimization Preference (DPO) simplifies the process by treating alignment as a classification task over binary preference pairs.<n>We propose Multi-Preference Lambda-weighted Listwise DPO, which allows the model to learn from more detailed human feedback.<n>Our method consistently outperforms standard DPO on alignment while enabling efficient, controllable, and fine-grained adaptation suitable for real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T16:47:17Z)
• Optimal Transport-Based Token Weighting scheme for Enhanced Preference Optimization [17.801062522027266]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising framework for aligning Large Language Models with human preferences.<n>Existing methods assign equal importance to all tokens in the response, while humans focus on more meaningful parts.<n>We propose textbfOptimal textbfTransport-based token weighting scheme for enhancing direct textbfPreference textbfOptimization (OTPO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T14:44:15Z)
• Self-Improvement Towards Pareto Optimality: Mitigating Preference Conflicts in Multi-Objective Alignment [74.25832963097658]
  Multi-Objective Alignment (MOA) aims to align responses with multiple human preference objectives.<n>We find that DPO-based MOA approaches suffer from widespread preference conflicts in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T08:27:00Z)
• Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language Models [54.381650481255235]
  We introduce a new tuning-free approach for self-alignment, Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization (O) Our approach leverages a search-based optimization framework that allows LLMs to iteratively self-improve and craft the optimal alignment instructions. Empirical evaluations on eight recent LLMs, both open and closed-sourced, demonstrate that DRPO significantly enhances alignment performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T16:15:38Z)
• Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier [0.5120567378386615]
  We propose a unified approach to aligning large language models (LLMs)<n>Based on a simple decomposition of preference and auxiliary objectives, we allow for tuning LLMs to optimize user and designer preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T08:35:48Z)
• Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment [103.12563033438715]
  Alignment in artificial intelligence pursues consistency between model responses and human preferences as well as values. Existing alignment techniques are mostly unidirectional, leading to suboptimal trade-offs and poor flexibility over various objectives. We introduce controllable preference optimization (CPO), which explicitly specifies preference scores for different objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T12:12:30Z)
• Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment [54.97015778517253]
  We propose generalized preference optimization (GPO), a family of offline losses parameterized by a general class of convex functions. GPO enables a unified view over preference optimization, encompassing existing algorithms such as DPO, IPO and SLiC as special cases. Our results present new algorithmic toolkits and empirical insights to alignment practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T15:33:09Z)
• Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback [70.32795295142648]
  Linear alignment is a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step. Experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T10:46:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.