From Code-Centric to Concept-Centric: Teaching NLP with LLM-Assisted "Vibe Coding"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01919v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 10:21:34 GMT
• Title: From Code-Centric to Concept-Centric: Teaching NLP with LLM-Assisted "Vibe Coding"
• Authors: Hend Al-Khalifa,
• Abstract summary: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents both challenges and opportunities for Natural Language Processing (NLP) education.<n>This paper introduces Vibe Coding'', a pedagogical approach that leverages LLMs as coding assistants while maintaining focus on conceptual understanding and critical thinking.
• Score: 0.8037663518154744
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents both challenges and opportunities for Natural Language Processing (NLP) education. This paper introduces ``Vibe Coding,'' a pedagogical approach that leverages LLMs as coding assistants while maintaining focus on conceptual understanding and critical thinking. We describe the implementation of this approach in a senior-level undergraduate NLP course, where students completed seven labs using LLMs for code generation while being assessed primarily on conceptual understanding through critical reflection questions. Analysis of end-of-course feedback from 19 students reveals high satisfaction (mean scores 4.4-4.6/5.0) across engagement, conceptual learning, and assessment fairness. Students particularly valued the reduced cognitive load from debugging, enabling deeper focus on NLP concepts. However, challenges emerged around time constraints, LLM output verification, and the need for clearer task specifications. Our findings suggest that when properly structured with mandatory prompt logging and reflection-based assessment, LLM-assisted learning can shift focus from syntactic fluency to conceptual mastery, preparing students for an AI-augmented professional landscape.

Related papers

• Large Language Models as Students Who Think Aloud: Overly Coherent, Verbose, and Confident [0.8564319625930894]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in AI-based tutoring systems. Can they faithfully model novice reasoning and metacognitive judgments?<n>We evaluate LLMs as novices using 630 think-aloud utterances from chemistry tutoring problems with problem-solving logs of student hint use, attempts, and problem context.<n>We compare LLM-generated reasoning to human learner utterances under minimal and extended contextual prompting, and assess the models' ability to predict step-level learner success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T04:46:38Z)
• A Practical Guide for Supporting Formative Assessment and Feedback Using Generative AI [0.0]
  Large-language models (LLMs) can help students, teachers, and peers understand "where learners are going," "where learners currently are," and "how to move learners forward"<n>This review provides a comprehensive foundation for integrating LLMs into formative assessment in a pedagogically informed manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T12:52:43Z)
• Enhanced Bloom's Educational Taxonomy for Fostering Information Literacy in the Era of Large Language Models [16.31527042425208]
  This paper proposes an LLM-driven Bloom's Educational Taxonomy that aims to recognize and evaluate students' information literacy (IL) with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The framework delineates the IL corresponding to the cognitive abilities required to use LLM into two distinct stages: Exploration & Action and Creation & Metacognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T08:23:49Z)
• Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMs [49.18567856499736]
  We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can be supportive of open-ended dialogue tutoring.<n>We apply a range of knowledge tracing (KT) methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue.<n>We conduct experiments on two tutoring dialogue datasets, and show that a novel yet simple LLM-based method, LLMKT, significantly outperforms existing KT methods in predicting student response correctness in dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T22:31:39Z)
• Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing [56.75702900542643]
  We introduce AlphaLLM for the self-improvements of Large Language Models.<n>It integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with LLMs to establish a self-improving loop.<n>Our experimental results show that AlphaLLM significantly enhances the performance of LLMs without additional annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T15:21:34Z)
• Automate Knowledge Concept Tagging on Math Questions with LLMs [48.5585921817745]
  Knowledge concept tagging for questions plays a crucial role in contemporary intelligent educational applications. Traditionally, these annotations have been conducted manually with help from pedagogical experts. In this paper, we explore the automating the tagging task using Large Language Models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T00:09:38Z)
• Explaining Code with a Purpose: An Integrated Approach for Developing Code Comprehension and Prompting Skills [4.776920192249936]
  We propose using an LLM to generate code based on students' responses to EiPE questions. We report student success in creating effective prompts for solving EiPE questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T00:23:08Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• When LLMs Meet Cunning Texts: A Fallacy Understanding Benchmark for Large Language Models [59.84769254832941]
  We propose a FaLlacy Understanding Benchmark (FLUB) containing cunning texts that are easy for humans to understand but difficult for models to grasp. Specifically, the cunning texts that FLUB focuses on mainly consist of the tricky, humorous, and misleading texts collected from the real internet environment. Based on FLUB, we investigate the performance of multiple representative and advanced LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T22:12:53Z)
• TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models [52.734140807634624]
  Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety. Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs. We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understanding [119.45683008451698]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on a series of natural language understanding tasks. They might rely on dataset bias and artifacts as shortcuts for prediction. This has significantly affected their generalizability and adversarial robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T03:51:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.