Monotonicity as an Architectural Bias for Robust Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02686v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 19:03:19 GMT
• Title: Monotonicity as an Architectural Bias for Robust Language Models
• Authors: Patrick Cooper, Alireza Nadali, Ashutosh Trivedi, Alvaro Velasquez,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are known to exhibit brittle behavior under adversarial prompts and jailbreak attacks.<n>We investigate monotonicity as an architectural inductive bias for improving the robustness of Transformer-based language models.
• Score: 9.84177443010824
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are known to exhibit brittle behavior under adversarial prompts and jailbreak attacks, even after extensive alignment and fine-tuning. This fragility reflects a broader challenge of modern neural language models: small, carefully structured perturbations in high-dimensional input spaces can induce large and unpredictable changes in internal semantic representations and output. We investigate monotonicity as an architectural inductive bias for improving the robustness of Transformer-based language models. Monotonicity constrains semantic transformations so that strengthening information, evidence, or constraints cannot lead to regressions in the corresponding internal representations. Such order-preserving behavior has long been exploited in control and safety-critical systems to simplify reasoning and improve robustness, but has traditionally been viewed as incompatible with the expressivity required by neural language models. We show that this trade-off is not inherent. By enforcing monotonicity selectively in the feed-forward sublayers of sequence-to-sequence Transformers -- while leaving attention mechanisms unconstrained -- we obtain monotone language models that preserve the performance of their pretrained counterparts. This architectural separation allows negation, contradiction, and contextual interactions to be introduced explicitly through attention, while ensuring that subsequent semantic refinement is order-preserving. Empirically, monotonicity substantially improves robustness: adversarial attack success rates drop from approximately 69% to 19%, while standard summarization performance degrades only marginally.

Related papers

• Same Answer, Different Representations: Hidden instability in VLMs [65.36933543377346]
  We introduce a representation-aware and frequency-aware evaluation framework that measures internal embedding drift, spectral sensitivity, and structural smoothness.<n>We apply this framework to modern Vision Language Models (VLMs) across the SEEDBench, MMMU, and POPE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T12:24:26Z)
• Character as a Latent Variable in Large Language Models: A Mechanistic Account of Emergent Misalignment and Conditional Safety Failures [70.48661957773449]
  Emergent Misalignment refers to a failure mode in which fine-tuning large language models on narrowly scoped data induces broadly misaligned behavior.<n>Across multiple domains and model families, we find that fine-tuning models on data exhibiting specific character-level dispositions induces substantially stronger and more transferable misalignment than incorrect-advice fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T15:28:42Z)
• Disentangling Recall and Reasoning in Transformer Models through Layer-wise Attention and Activation Analysis [3.1526281887627587]
  Distinguishing recall from reasoning is crucial for predicting model generalization.<n>We use controlled datasets of synthetic linguistic puzzles to probe transformer models at the layer, head, and neuron level.<n>Our results provide the first causal evidence that recall and reasoning rely on separable but interacting circuits in transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T04:13:06Z)
• Adversarial Defence without Adversarial Defence: Enhancing Language Model Robustness via Instance-level Principal Component Removal [28.588188876688037]
  Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have driven substantial progress in natural language processing but remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks.<n>We propose a simple yet effective add-on module that enhances the adversarial robustness of PLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T12:31:26Z)
• $φ^{\infty}$: Clause Purification, Embedding Realignment, and the Total Suppression of the Em Dash in Autoregressive Language Models [0.0]
  We identify a critical vulnerability in autoregressive transformer language models where the em dash token induces semantic drift.<n>We propose a novel solution combining symbolic clause purification via the phi-infinity operator with targeted embedding matrix.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T18:27:39Z)
• Latent Convergence Modulation in Large Language Models: A Novel Approach to Iterative Contextual Realignment [0.0]
  A structured modulation mechanism was introduced to regulate hidden state transitions.<n>Lattice adjustments contributed to reductions in perplexity fluctuations, entropy variance, and lexical instability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T09:46:33Z)
• Beyond Interpretability: The Gains of Feature Monosemanticity on Model Robustness [68.69369585600698]
  Deep learning models often suffer from a lack of interpretability due to polysemanticity. Recent advances in monosemanticity, where neurons correspond to consistent and distinct semantics, have significantly improved interpretability. We show that monosemantic features not only enhance interpretability but also bring concrete gains in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T18:03:20Z)
• Strengthening Structural Inductive Biases by Pre-training to Perform Syntactic Transformations [75.14793516745374]
  We propose to strengthen the structural inductive bias of a Transformer by intermediate pre-training. Our experiments confirm that this helps with few-shot learning of syntactic tasks such as chunking. Our analysis shows that the intermediate pre-training leads to attention heads that keep track of which syntactic transformation needs to be applied to which token.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T14:29:44Z)
• Enriching Non-Autoregressive Transformer with Syntactic and SemanticStructures for Neural Machine Translation [54.864148836486166]
  We propose to incorporate the explicit syntactic and semantic structures of languages into a non-autoregressive Transformer. Our model achieves a significantly faster speed, as well as keeps the translation quality when compared with several state-of-the-art non-autoregressive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-22T04:12:17Z)
• Improve Variational Autoencoder for Text Generationwith Discrete Latent Bottleneck [52.08901549360262]
  Variational autoencoders (VAEs) are essential tools in end-to-end representation learning. VAEs tend to ignore latent variables with a strong auto-regressive decoder. We propose a principled approach to enforce an implicit latent feature matching in a more compact latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T14:41:37Z)
• Discrete Variational Attention Models for Language Generation [51.88612022940496]
  We propose a discrete variational attention model with categorical distribution over the attention mechanism owing to the discrete nature in languages. Thanks to the property of discreteness, the training of our proposed approach does not suffer from posterior collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T05:49:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.