RISE: Interactive Visual Diagnosis of Fairness in Machine Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04339v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 09:01:21 GMT
• Title: RISE: Interactive Visual Diagnosis of Fairness in Machine Learning Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce textitRISE (Residual Inspection through Sorted Evaluation), an interactive visualization tool that converts sorted residuals into interpretable patterns.<n>By connecting residual curve structures to formal fairness notions, RISE enables localized disparity diagnosis, subgroup comparison across environments, and the detection of hidden fairness issues.
• Score: 3.409008933025072
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating fairness under domain shift is challenging because scalar metrics often obscure exactly where and how disparities arise. We introduce \textit{RISE} (Residual Inspection through Sorted Evaluation), an interactive visualization tool that converts sorted residuals into interpretable patterns. By connecting residual curve structures to formal fairness notions, RISE enables localized disparity diagnosis, subgroup comparison across environments, and the detection of hidden fairness issues. Through post-hoc analysis, RISE exposes accuracy-fairness trade-offs that aggregate statistics miss, supporting more informed model selection.

Related papers

• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• When Fairness Metrics Disagree: Evaluating the Reliability of Demographic Fairness Assessment in Machine Learning [0.0]
  We investigate the consistency of fairness evaluation by conducting a systematic multi-metric analysis of demographic bias in machine learning models.<n>Our results demonstrate that fairness assessments can vary significantly depending on the choice of metrics, leading to contradictory conclusions regarding model bias.<n>These findings highlight a critical limitation in current fairness evaluation practices and suggest that single-metric reporting is insufficient for reliable bias assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T14:07:37Z)
• Reliable and Reproducible Demographic Inference for Fairness in Face Analysis [63.46525489354455]
  We propose a fully reproducible DAI pipeline that replaces conventional end-to-end training with a modular transfer learning approach.<n>We audit this pipeline across three dimensions: accuracy, fairness, and a newly introduced notion of robustness, defined via intra-identity consistency.<n>Our results show that the proposed method outperforms strong baselines, particularly on ethnicity, which is the more challenging attribute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T12:22:02Z)
• Data-Driven Analysis of Intersectional Bias in Image Classification: A Framework with Bias-Weighted Augmentation [0.0]
  We introduce the Intersectional Fairness Evaluation Framework (IFEF), which combines quantitative fairness metrics with interpretability tools to identify bias patterns in model predictions.<n>We then propose Bias-Weighted Augmentation (BWA), a novel data augmentation strategy that adapts transformation intensities based on subgroup distribution statistics.<n>Experiments on the Open Images V7 dataset with five object classes demonstrate that BWA improves accuracy for underrepresented class-environment intersections by up to 24 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T09:10:57Z)
• Understanding challenges to the interpretation of disaggregated evaluations of algorithmic fairness [49.35494016290887]
  We show that equal performance across subgroups is an unreliable measure of fairness when data are representative of relevant populations but reflective of real-world disparities.<n>Our framework suggests complementing disaggregated evaluations with explicit causal assumptions and analysis to control for confounding and distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T17:40:31Z)
• FAIR-SIGHT: Fairness Assurance in Image Recognition via Simultaneous Conformal Thresholding and Dynamic Output Repair [4.825037489691159]
  We introduce a post-hoc framework designed to ensure fairness in computer vision systems by combining conformal prediction with a dynamic output repair mechanism.<n>Our approach calculates a fairness-aware non-conformity score that simultaneously assesses prediction errors and fairness violations.<n>When the non-conformity score for a new image exceeds the threshold, FAIR-SIGHT implements targeted corrective adjustments, such as logit shifts for classification and confidence recalibration for detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:23:06Z)
• Learning Fair Invariant Representations under Covariate and Correlation Shifts Simultaneously [10.450977234741524]
  We introduce a novel approach that focuses on learning a fairness-aware domain-invariant predictor. Our approach surpasses state-of-the-art methods with respect to model accuracy as well as both group and individual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T00:01:04Z)
• Counterfactual Fairness through Transforming Data Orthogonal to Bias [7.109458605736819]
  We propose a novel data pre-processing algorithm, Orthogonal to Bias (OB)<n>OB is designed to eliminate the influence of a group of continuous sensitive variables, thus promoting counterfactual fairness in machine learning applications.<n>OB is model-agnostic, making it applicable to a wide range of machine learning models and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T16:40:08Z)
• Evaluating Probabilistic Classifiers: The Triptych [62.997667081978825]
  We propose and study a triptych of diagnostic graphics that focus on distinct and complementary aspects of forecast performance. The reliability diagram addresses calibration, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve diagnoses discrimination ability, and the Murphy diagram visualizes overall predictive performance and value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T19:35:23Z)
• Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual Information Minimization [77.8735802150511]
  We propose a cross-sample adversarial debiasing (CSAD) method to remove the bias information misused by the target task. The correlation measurement plays a critical role in adversarial debiasing and is conducted by a cross-sample neural mutual information estimator. We conduct thorough experiments on publicly available datasets to validate the advantages of the proposed method over state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T21:17:02Z)
• Trusted Multi-View Classification [76.73585034192894]
  We propose a novel multi-view classification method, termed trusted multi-view classification. It provides a new paradigm for multi-view learning by dynamically integrating different views at an evidence level. The proposed algorithm jointly utilizes multiple views to promote both classification reliability and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-03T13:30:26Z)
• On Disentangled Representations Learned From Correlated Data [59.41587388303554]
  We bridge the gap to real-world scenarios by analyzing the behavior of the most prominent disentanglement approaches on correlated data. We show that systematically induced correlations in the dataset are being learned and reflected in the latent representations. We also demonstrate how to resolve these latent correlations, either using weak supervision during training or by post-hoc correcting a pre-trained model with a small number of labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T12:47:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.