Beyond Unimodal Shortcuts: MLLMs as Cross-Modal Reasoners for Grounded Named Entity Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04486v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 12:12:49 GMT
• Title: Beyond Unimodal Shortcuts: MLLMs as Cross-Modal Reasoners for Grounded Named Entity Recognition
• Authors: Jinlong Ma, Yu Zhang, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Yuwei Wang, Zeming Liu, Jun Yu, Min Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (GMNER) aims to extract text-based entities, assign them semantic categories, and ground them to corresponding visual regions.<n> MLLMs exhibit $textbfmodality bias$, including visual bias and textual bias, which stems from their tendency to take unimodal shortcuts.<n>We propose Modality-aware Consistency Reasoning ($bfMCR$), which enforces structured cross-modal reasoning.
• Score: 51.68340973140949
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (GMNER) aims to extract text-based entities, assign them semantic categories, and ground them to corresponding visual regions. In this work, we explore the potential of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to perform GMNER in an end-to-end manner, moving beyond their typical role as auxiliary tools within cascaded pipelines. Crucially, our investigation reveals a fundamental challenge: MLLMs exhibit $\textbf{modality bias}$, including visual bias and textual bias, which stems from their tendency to take unimodal shortcuts rather than rigorous cross-modal verification. To address this, we propose Modality-aware Consistency Reasoning ($\textbf{MCR}$), which enforces structured cross-modal reasoning through Multi-style Reasoning Schema Injection (MRSI) and Constraint-guided Verifiable Optimization (CVO). MRSI transforms abstract constraints into executable reasoning chains, while CVO empowers the model to dynamically align its reasoning trajectories with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Experiments on GMNER and visual grounding tasks demonstrate that MCR effectively mitigates modality bias and achieves superior performance compared to existing baselines.

Related papers

• Reasoning-Driven Multimodal LLM for Domain Generalization [72.00754603114187]
  We study the role of reasoning in domain generalization using DomainBed-Reasoning dataset.<n>We propose RD-MLDG, a framework with two components: MTCT (Multi-Task Cross-Training) and SARR (Self-Aligned Reasoning Regularization)<n>Experiments on standard DomainBed datasets demonstrate that RD-MLDG achieves complementary state-of-the-art performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:10:06Z)
• Embed-RL: Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning-Driven Multimodal Embeddings [44.77164359074224]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become pivotal for advancing Universal Multimodal Embeddings (UME)<n>Recent studies demonstrate that incorporating generative Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning can substantially enhance task-specific representations.<n>We propose a reasoning-driven UME framework that integrates Embedder-Guided Reinforcement Learning (EG-RL) to optimize the Reasoner to produce evidential Traceability CoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T15:35:03Z)
• Guided Verifier: Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning via Dynamic Process Supervision [11.159231524113764]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>In this paper, we propose the textbfGuided Verifier framework to address these structural limitations.<n>We develop a specialized data synthesis pipeline targeting multimodal hallucinations, constructing textbfCoRe dataset of process-level negatives and textbfCorrect-guide textbfReasoning trajectories to train the guided verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T07:38:42Z)
• Refer-Agent: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System with Reasoning and Reflection for Referring Video Object Segmentation [50.22481337087162]
  Referring Video Object (RVOS) aims to segment objects in videos based on textual queries.<n>Refer-Agent is a collaborative multi-agent system with alternating reasoning-reflection mechanisms.<n>It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, including both SFT-based models and zero-shot approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T14:48:12Z)
• Reasoning Guided Embeddings: Leveraging MLLM Reasoning for Improved Multimodal Retrieval [25.629529312687694]
  We propose Reasoning Guided Embeddings (RGE), which preserves the generative rationale process of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Our method first enables the model to perform structured rationale generation conditioned on the instruction, and then extracts representations after reasoning has unfolded.<n>Experiments on the MMEB benchmark show that reasoning-guided conditioning improves multimodal retrieval performance by 4.9% over the non-reasoning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T08:44:47Z)
• CIR-CoT: Towards Interpretable Composed Image Retrieval via End-to-End Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [93.05917922306196]
  Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) aims to find a target image from a reference image and a modification text.<n>CIR-CoT is the first end-to-end retrieval-oriented MLLM designed to integrate explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T09:41:45Z)
• Think Then Embed: Generative Context Improves Multimodal Embedding [51.76690812535934]
  We propose a Think-Then-Embed (TTE) framework for Universal Multimodal Embeddings (UME), composed of a reasoner and an embedder.<n>By leveraging a powerful MLLM reasoner, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on the MMEB-V2 benchmark, surpassing proprietary models trained on massive in-house datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T16:53:56Z)
• Explaining multimodal LLMs via intra-modal token interactions [55.27436637894534]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse vision-language tasks, yet their internal decision-making mechanisms remain insufficiently understood.<n>We propose enhancing interpretability by leveraging intra-modal interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:39:13Z)
• Evaluating and Steering Modality Preferences in Multimodal Large Language Model [42.828461839307174]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on complex tasks with multimodal context.<n>We show that all 18 tested MLLMs generally demonstrate clear modality bias, and modality preference can be influenced by external interventions.<n>We propose a probing and steering method based on representation engineering to explicitly control modality preference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T10:07:59Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs)<n>We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.