Learning Where It Matters: Geometric Anchoring for Robust Preference Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04909v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:40:21 GMT
• Title: Learning Where It Matters: Geometric Anchoring for Robust Preference Alignment
• Authors: Youngjae Cho, Jongsuk Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim,
• Abstract summary: We propose Geometric Anchor Preference Optimization (GAPO), which replaces the fixed reference with a dynamic, geometry-aware anchor.<n>GAPO consistently improves robustness while matching or improving performance on standard LLM alignment and reasoning benchmarks.
• Score: 6.428964221372943
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and related methods align large language models from pairwise preferences by regularizing updates against a fixed reference policy. As the policy drifts, a static reference, however, can become increasingly miscalibrated, leading to distributional mismatch and amplifying spurious preference signals under noisy supervision. Conversely, reference-free variants avoid mismatch but often suffer from unconstrained reward drift. We propose Geometric Anchor Preference Optimization (GAPO), which replaces the fixed reference with a dynamic, geometry-aware anchor: an adversarial local perturbation of the current policy within a small radius that serves as a pessimistic baseline. This anchor enables an adaptive reweighting mechanism, modulating the importance of each preference pair based on its local sensitivity. We further introduce the Anchor Gap, the reward discrepancy between the policy and its anchor, and show under smoothness conditions that it approximates worst-case local margin degradation. Optimizing a logistic objective weighted by this gap downweights geometrically brittle instances while emphasizing robust preference signals. Across diverse noise settings, GAPO consistently improves robustness while matching or improving performance on standard LLM alignment and reasoning benchmarks.

Related papers

• How Sampling Shapes LLM Alignment: From One-Shot Optima to Iterative Dynamics [65.67654005892469]
  We show that proper instance-dependent sampling can yield stronger ranking guarantees, while skewed on-policy sampling can induce excessive concentration under structured preferences.<n>We then analyze iterative alignment dynamics in which the learned policy feeds back into future sampling and reference policies.<n>Our theoretical insights extend to Direct Preference Optimization, indicating the phenomena we captured are common to a broader class of preference-alignment methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T17:11:08Z)
• Mitigating Mismatch within Reference-based Preference Optimization [55.07698254211876]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become the de facto standard for offline preference alignment of large language models.<n>DPO weighs each update relative to a reference, which stabilizes the training by regularizing the updates within a trusted region.<n>This reliance becomes problematic for pessimistic pairs, where the reference model prefers the rejected response.<n>We modify DPO to treat the reference as neutral when it is pessimistic by replacing $_-_mathrmref$ with $_-max0,_mathrmref$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T12:55:51Z)
• Revisiting Robustness for LLM Safety Alignment via Selective Geometry Control [55.366871033602145]
  We argue that robustness failures cannot be addressed by data-centric methods alone.<n>We propose ShaPO, a geometry-aware preference optimization framework.<n>ShaPO enforces worst-case alignment objectives via selective geometry control over alignment-critical parameter subspace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T03:46:33Z)
• Alignment-Aware Model Adaptation via Feedback-Guided Optimization [27.93864970404945]
  Fine-tuning is the primary mechanism for adapting foundation models to downstream tasks.<n>We propose an alignment-aware fine-tuning framework that integrates feedback from an external alignment signal through policy-gradient-based regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T16:03:16Z)
• Not All Preferences Are Created Equal: Stability-Aware and Gradient-Efficient Alignment for Reasoning Models [52.48582333951919]
  We propose a dynamic framework designed to enhance alignment reliability by maximizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of policy updates.<n>SAGE (Stability-Aware Gradient Efficiency) integrates a coarse-grained curriculum mechanism that refreshes candidate pools based on model competence.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly accelerates convergence and outperforms static baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:56:10Z)
• Latent Adversarial Regularization for Offline Preference Optimization [21.271580780278473]
  We introduce GANPO, which achieves latent-space regularization by penalizing divergence between internal representations of a policy model and a reference model.<n>Experiments across multiple model architectures and tasks show consistent improvements from latent-space regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:21:57Z)
• MAESTRO: Meta-learning Adaptive Estimation of Scalarization Trade-offs for Reward Optimization [56.074760766965085]
  Group-Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as an efficient paradigm for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose MAESTRO, which treats reward scalarization as a dynamic latent policy, leveraging the model's terminal hidden states as a semantic bottleneck.<n>We formulate this as a contextual bandit problem within a bi-level optimization framework, where a lightweight Conductor network co-evolves with the policy by utilizing group-relative advantages as a meta-reward signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:02:48Z)
• Anchoring Values in Temporal and Group Dimensions for Flow Matching Model Alignment [61.80228667422234]
  VGPO redefines value estimation across both temporal and group dimensions.<n>It transforms the sparse terminal reward into dense, process-aware value estimates.<n>It replaces standard group normalization with a novel process enhanced by absolute values to maintain a stable optimization signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T16:31:26Z)
• AMaPO: Adaptive Margin-attached Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [25.526336903358757]
  offline preference optimization offers a simpler and more stable alternative to RLHF for aligning language models.<n>We propose Adaptive Margin-attached Preference Optimization (AMaPO), a simple yet principled algorithm.<n>AMaPO employs an instance-wise adaptive margin, refined by Z-normalization and exponential scaling, which dynamically reallocates learning effort by amplifying gradients for misranked samples and suppressing them for correct ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T14:51:59Z)
• ADARL: Adaptive Low-Rank Structures for Robust Policy Learning under Uncertainty [28.291179179647795]
  We propose textbfAdaptive Rank Representation (AdaRL), a bi-level optimization framework that improves robustness.<n>At the lower level, AdaRL performs policy optimization under fixed-rank constraints with dynamics sampled from a Wasserstein ball around a centroid model.<n>At the upper level, it adaptively adjusts the rank to balance the bias--variance trade-off, projecting policy parameters onto a low-rank manifold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T20:05:34Z)
• On Symmetric Losses for Robust Policy Optimization with Noisy Preferences [55.8615920580824]
  This work focuses on reward modeling, a core component in reinforcement learning from human feedback.<n>We propose a principled framework for robust policy optimization under noisy preferences.<n>We prove that symmetric losses enable successful policy optimization even under noisy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T15:30:43Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [106.63518036538163]
  We present a novel unified bilevel optimization-based framework, textsfPARL, formulated to address the recently highlighted critical issue of policy alignment in reinforcement learning. Our framework addressed these concerns by explicitly parameterizing the distribution of the upper alignment objective (reward design) by the lower optimal variable. Our empirical results substantiate that the proposed textsfPARL can address the alignment concerns in RL by showing significant improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T18:03:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.