A Data Driven Structural Decomposition of Dynamic Games via Best Response Maps
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05324v1
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 05:44:53 GMT
- Title: A Data Driven Structural Decomposition of Dynamic Games via Best Response Maps
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces a conceptually novel formulation for dynamic games by restructuring the equilibrium computation.<n>The proposed formulation is supported by mathematical proofs, accompanying a large-scale Monte Carlo study in a two-player open-loop dynamic game motivated by the autonomous racing problem.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Dynamic games are powerful tools to model multi-agent decision-making, yet computing Nash (generalized Nash) equilibria remains a central challenge in such settings. Complexity arises from tightly coupled optimality conditions, nested optimization structures, and poor numerical conditioning. Existing game-theoretic solvers address these challenges by directly solving the joint game, typically requiring explicit modeling of all agents' objective functions and constraints, while learning-based approaches often decouple interaction through prediction or policy approximation, sacrificing equilibrium consistency. This paper introduces a conceptually novel formulation for dynamic games by restructuring the equilibrium computation. Rather than solving a fully coupled game or decoupling agents through prediction or policy approximation, a data-driven structural reduction of the game is proposed that removes nested optimization layers and derivative coupling by embedding an offline-compiled best-response map as a feasibility constraint. Under standard regularity conditions, when the best-response operator is exact, any converged solution of the reduced problem corresponds to a local open-loop Nash (GNE) equilibrium of the original game; with a learned surrogate, the solution is approximately equilibrium-consistent up to the best-response approximation error. The proposed formulation is supported by mathematical proofs, accompanying a large-scale Monte Carlo study in a two-player open-loop dynamic game motivated by the autonomous racing problem. Comparisons are made against state-of-the-art joint game solvers, and results are reported on solution quality, computational cost, and constraint satisfaction.
Related papers
- A Forward-Inverse Dynamic Game Framework for Enhanced Multi-Agent Trajectory Planning [10.027004863448854]
We propose a KL-regularized dynamic game with a state-dependent weight that adaptively balances optimality and behavioral priors.<n>We establish per-it well-posedness of the regularized local game and show that the adaptive weighting function remains Lipschitz continuous under bounded nominal-trajectory updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T03:15:37Z) - Parametric Open Source Games [78.29352305480285]
We introduce parametric open-source games, a continuous analogue of program equilibria.<n>We derive an exact coupling threshold at which selfish gradient ascent in symmetric $2times2$ games switches from defection toward cooperation.<n>We extend the framework to a neural semantics class whose first-order cooperation condition is governed by the ratio of cross-player to self-player sensitivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-25T14:14:24Z) - Generalized Distributional Alignment Games for Unbiased Answer-Level Fine-Tuning [49.24876001249647]
Distributional Alignment Game framework provides powerful variational perspective on Answer-Level Fine-Tuning (ALFT)<n>Standard algorithms for these games rely on estimating logarithmic rewards from small batches, introducing a systematic bias due to Jensen's inequality that can destabilize training.<n>We generalize the alignment game to arbitrary Bregman divergences, showing that for a family of geometries inducing rewards, we can construct provably exact and unbiased estimators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T10:34:42Z) - Asymmetric Nash Seeking via Best Response Maps: Global Linear Convergence and Robustness to Inexact Reaction Models [0.0]
Nash equilibria provide a principled framework for modeling interactions in multi-agent decision-making and control.<n>This letter studies a class of asymmetric-information two-player constrained games with decoupled feasible sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T18:45:56Z) - Generalization Bounds of Surrogate Policies for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [53.03951222945921]
We analyze smoothed (perturbed) policies, adding controlled random perturbations to the direction used by the linear oracle.<n>Our main contribution is a generalization bound that decomposes the excess risk into perturbation bias, statistical estimation error, and optimization error.<n>We illustrate the scope of the results on applications such as vehicle scheduling, highlighting how smoothing enables both tractable training and controlled generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T12:00:30Z) - On Tractable $Φ$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games [53.212133025684224]
We study tractable $Phi$-equilibria in non-concave games.<n>We show that when $Phi$ is finite, there exists an efficient uncoupled learning algorithm that converges to the corresponding $Phi$-equilibria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T01:51:30Z) - Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learning via Bounded Rationality
Curricula [23.80052541774509]
Adversarial Reinforcement Learning trains a protagonist against destabilizing forces exercised by an adversary in a competitive zero-sum Markov game.
Finding Nash equilibria requires facing complex saddle point optimization problems, which can be prohibitive to solve.
We propose a novel approach for adversarial RL based on entropy regularization to ease the complexity of the saddle point optimization problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T00:00:32Z) - Finding mixed-strategy equilibria of continuous-action games without
gradients using randomized policy networks [83.28949556413717]
We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of continuous-action game without access to gradients.
We model players' strategies using artificial neural networks.
This paper is the first to solve general continuous-action games with unrestricted mixed strategies and without any gradient information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T05:16:41Z) - Efficiently Computing Nash Equilibria in Adversarial Team Markov Games [19.717850955051837]
We introduce a class of games in which a team identically players is competing against an adversarial player.
This setting allows for a unifying treatment of zero-sum Markov games potential games.
Our main contribution is the first algorithm for computing stationary $epsilon$-approximate Nash equilibria in adversarial team Markov games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-03T16:41:01Z) - Optimal Correlated Equilibria in General-Sum Extensive-Form Games: Fixed-Parameter Algorithms, Hardness, and Two-Sided Column-Generation [78.48747645545944]
We study the problem of finding optimal correlated equilibria of various sorts in extensive-form games.
We introduce a new algorithm for computing optimal equilibria in all three notions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T15:21:18Z) - Learning to Compute Approximate Nash Equilibrium for Normal-form Games [15.321036952379488]
We propose a general meta learning approach to computing approximate Nash equilibrium for finite $n$-player normal-form games.
Unlike existing solutions that approximate or learn a Nash equilibrium from scratch for each of the games, our meta solver directly constructs a mapping from a game utility matrix to a joint strategy profile.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-17T07:06:46Z) - Better Regularization for Sequential Decision Spaces: Fast Convergence
Rates for Nash, Correlated, and Team Equilibria [121.36609493711292]
We study the application of iterative first-order methods to the problem of computing equilibria of large-scale two-player extensive-form games.
By instantiating first-order methods with our regularizers, we develop the first accelerated first-order methods for computing correlated equilibra and ex-ante coordinated team equilibria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-27T06:10:24Z) - Optimal control of robust team stochastic games [5.425935258756356]
We propose a model of "robust" team games, where players utilize a robust optimization approach to make decisions.
We develop a learning algorithm in the form of a Gauss-Seidel modified policy iteration and prove its convergence.
Some numerical simulations are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-16T10:42:09Z) - Competitive Mirror Descent [67.31015611281225]
Constrained competitive optimization involves multiple agents trying to minimize conflicting objectives, subject to constraints.
We propose competitive mirror descent (CMD): a general method for solving such problems based on first order information.
As a special case we obtain a novel competitive multiplicative weights algorithm for problems on the positive cone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-17T22:11:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.