Assessing Electricity Demand Forecasting with Exogenous Data in Time Series Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05390v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 07:17:21 GMT
• Title: Assessing Electricity Demand Forecasting with Exogenous Data in Time Series Foundation Models
• Authors: Wei Soon Cheong, Lian Lian Jiang, Jamie Ng Suat Ling,
• Abstract summary: This paper empirically evaluates foundation models capable of modeling cross-channel correlations against a baseline LSTM.<n>We find that the simple baseline frequently outperforms all foundation models in Singapore's stable climate, particularly for short-term horizons.<n>These results challenge assumptions about universal foundation model superiority and highlight the need for domain-specific models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Time-series foundation models have emerged as a new paradigm for forecasting, yet their ability to effectively leverage exogenous features -- critical for electricity demand forecasting -- remains unclear. This paper empirically evaluates foundation models capable of modeling cross-channel correlations against a baseline LSTM with reversible instance normalization across Singaporean and Australian electricity markets at hourly and daily granularities. We systematically assess MOIRAI, MOMENT, TinyTimeMixers, ChronosX, and Chronos-2 under three feature configurations: all features, selected features, and target-only. Our findings reveal highly variable effectiveness: while Chronos-2 achieves the best performance among foundation models (in zero-shot settings), the simple baseline frequently outperforms all foundation models in Singapore's stable climate, particularly for short-term horizons. Model architecture proves critical, with synergistic architectural implementations (TTM's channel-mixing, Chronos-2's grouped attention) consistently leveraging exogenous features, while other approaches show inconsistent benefits. Geographic context emerges as equally important, with foundation models demonstrating advantages primarily in variable climates. These results challenge assumptions about universal foundation model superiority and highlight the need for domain-specific models, specifically in the energy domain.

Related papers

• Conversational Time Series Foundation Models: Towards Explainable and Effective Forecasting [13.958506262265871]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer powerful reasoning capabilities, but their direct application to time series forecasting has proven ineffective.<n>We introduce an R1-style finetuning process, guided by SHAP-based faithfulness scores, which teaches the model to interpret ensemble weights as meaningful causal statements.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms leading time series foundation models on both CRPS and MASE metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T23:14:38Z)
• Synapse: Adaptive Arbitration of Complementary Expertise in Time Series Foundational Models [50.877082340479085]
  We study how different Time Series Foundational Models (TSFMs) exhibit specialized performance profiles across various forecasting settings.<n>We propose Synapse, a novel arbitration framework for TSFMs.<n>Results demonstrate that Synapse consistently outperforms other popular ensembling techniques as well as individual TSFMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T18:01:51Z)
• Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecasting [52.753731922908905]
  Chronos-2 is a pretrained model capable of handling univariate, multivariate, and covariate-informed forecasting tasks in a zero-shot manner.<n>It delivers state-of-the-art performance across three comprehensive benchmarks: fev-bench, GIFT-Eval, and Chronos Benchmark II.<n>The in-context learning capabilities of Chronos-2 establish it as a general-purpose forecasting model that can be used "as is" in real-world forecasting pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T17:00:53Z)
• How Foundational are Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting? [2.692427265051276]
  We argue that the inherent diversity of time series data makes foundation models less suited for building effective models.<n>We show that the zero-shot capabilities of a time series foundation model are significantly influenced and tied to the specific domains it has been pretrained on.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T10:25:43Z)
• Estimating Time Series Foundation Model Transferability via In-Context Learning [74.65355820906355]
  Time series foundation models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting via large-scale pre-training.<n>Fine-tuning remains critical for boosting performance in domains with limited public data.<n>We introduce TimeTic, a transferability estimation framework that recasts model selection as an in-context-learning problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T07:07:13Z)
• ARIES: Relation Assessment and Model Recommendation for Deep Time Series Forecasting [54.57031153712623]
  ARIES is a framework for assessing relation between time series properties and modeling strategies.<n>We propose the first deep forecasting model recommender, capable of providing interpretable suggestions for real-world time series.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T13:57:14Z)
• VARMA-Enhanced Transformer for Time Series Forecasting [4.982130518684668]
  VARMAformer is a novel architecture that synergizes the efficiency of a cross-attention-only framework with the principles of classical time series analysis.<n>By fusing these classical insights into a modern backbone, VARMAformer captures both global, long-range dependencies and local, statistical structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T03:32:51Z)
• On Identifying Why and When Foundation Models Perform Well on Time-Series Forecasting Using Automated Explanations and Rating [7.375605655806626]
  Time-series forecasting models (TSFM) have evolved from classical statistical methods to sophisticated foundation models.<n>This work addresses concerns by combining traditional explainable AI (XAI) methods with Rating Driven Explanations (RDE)<n>We evaluate four distinct model architectures: ARIMA, Gradient Boosting, Chronos (time-series specific foundation model), Llama (general-purpose; both fine-tuned and base models)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T05:27:45Z)
• MITA: Bridging the Gap between Model and Data for Test-time Adaptation [68.62509948690698]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the generalizability of models. We propose Meet-In-The-Middle based MITA, which introduces energy-based optimization to encourage mutual adaptation of the model and data from opposing directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:33Z)
• Probabilistic Emulation of a Global Climate Model with Spherical DYffusion [15.460280166612119]
  We present the first conditional generative model that produces accurate and physically consistent global climate ensemble simulations. Our model integrates the dynamics-informed diffusion framework (DYffusion) with the Spherical Fourier Neural Operator (SFNO) architecture. The model achieves near gold-standard performance for climate model emulation, outperforming existing approaches and demonstrating promising ensemble skill.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T00:16:55Z)
• Lag-Llama: Towards Foundation Models for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting [54.04430089029033]
  We present Lag-Llama, a general-purpose foundation model for time series forecasting based on a decoder-only transformer architecture. Lag-Llama is pretrained on a large corpus of diverse time series data from several domains, and demonstrates strong zero-shot generalization capabilities. When fine-tuned on relatively small fractions of such previously unseen datasets, Lag-Llama achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T12:29:32Z)
• Exploring Progress in Multivariate Time Series Forecasting: Comprehensive Benchmarking and Heterogeneity Analysis [70.78170766633039]
  We address the need for means of assessing MTS forecasting proposals reliably and fairly. BasicTS+ is a benchmark designed to enable fair, comprehensive, and reproducible comparison of MTS forecasting solutions. We apply BasicTS+ along with rich datasets to assess the capabilities of more than 45 MTS forecasting solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T19:52:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.