ADCA: Attention-Driven Multi-Party Collusion Attack in Federated Self-Supervised Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05612v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 12:49:36 GMT
• Title: ADCA: Attention-Driven Multi-Party Collusion Attack in Federated Self-Supervised Learning
• Authors: Jiayao Wang, Yiping Zhang, Jiale Zhang, Wenliang Yuan, Qilin Wu, Junwu Zhu, Dongfang Zhao,
• Abstract summary: Federated Self-Supervised Learning (FSSL) integrates privacy advantages of distributed training with the capability of self-supervised learning.<n>Recent studies have shown that FSSL is also vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>We propose the Attention-Driven multi-party Collusion Attack (ADCA)
• Score: 9.410118086518992
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Federated Self-Supervised Learning (FSSL) integrates the privacy advantages of distributed training with the capability of self-supervised learning to leverage unlabeled data, showing strong potential across applications. However, recent studies have shown that FSSL is also vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Existing attacks are limited by their trigger design, which typically employs a global, uniform trigger that is easily detected, gets diluted during aggregation, and lacks robustness in heterogeneous client environments. To address these challenges, we propose the Attention-Driven multi-party Collusion Attack (ADCA). During local pre-training, malicious clients decompose the global trigger to find optimal local patterns. Subsequently, these malicious clients collude to form a malicious coalition and establish a collaborative optimization mechanism within it. In this mechanism, each submits its model updates, and an attention mechanism dynamically aggregates them to explore the best cooperative strategy. The resulting aggregated parameters serve as the initial state for the next round of training within the coalition, thereby effectively mitigating the dilution of backdoor information by benign updates. Experiments on multiple FSSL scenarios and four datasets show that ADCA significantly outperforms existing methods in Attack Success Rate (ASR) and persistence, proving its effectiveness and robustness.

Related papers

• GShield: Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [2.6260952524631787]
  Federated Learning (FL) has recently emerged as a revolutionary approach to collaborative training Machine Learning models.<n>It enables decentralized model training while preserving data privacy, but its distributed nature makes it highly vulnerable to a severe attack known as Data Poisoning.<n>We present a novel defense mechanism called GShield, designed to detect and mitigate malicious and low-quality updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T11:29:28Z)
• Attribute Inference Attacks for Federated Regression Tasks [14.152503562997662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a global machine learning model while keeping their data localized.<n>Recent studies have revealed that the training phase of FL is vulnerable to reconstruction attacks.<n>We propose novel model-based AIAs specifically designed for regression tasks in FL environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T18:06:06Z)
• Celtibero: Robust Layered Aggregation for Federated Learning [0.0]
  We introduce Celtibero, a novel defense mechanism that integrates layered aggregation to enhance robustness against adversarial manipulation. We demonstrate that Celtibero consistently achieves high main task accuracy (MTA) while maintaining minimal attack success rates (ASR) across a range of untargeted and targeted poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T12:54:00Z)
• Genetic Algorithm-Based Dynamic Backdoor Attack on Federated Learning-Based Network Traffic Classification [1.1887808102491482]
  We propose GABAttack, a novel genetic algorithm-based backdoor attack against federated learning for network traffic classification. This research serves as an alarming call for network security experts and practitioners to develop robust defense measures against such attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:02:02Z)
• Client-side Gradient Inversion Against Federated Learning from Poisoning [59.74484221875662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed participants to train a global model without sharing data directly to a central server. Recent studies have revealed that FL is vulnerable to gradient inversion attack (GIA), which aims to reconstruct the original training samples. We propose Client-side poisoning Gradient Inversion (CGI), which is a novel attack method that can be launched from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T03:48:27Z)
• Mitigating Cross-client GANs-based Attack in Federated Learning [78.06700142712353]
  Multi distributed multimedia clients can resort to federated learning (FL) to jointly learn a global shared model. FL suffers from the cross-client generative adversarial networks (GANs)-based (C-GANs) attack. We propose Fed-EDKD technique to improve the current popular FL schemes to resist C-GANs attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T08:15:55Z)
• G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks through Attributed Client Graph Clustering [116.4277292854053]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers collaborative model training without data sharing. FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where poisoned model weights lead to compromised system integrity. We present G$2$uardFL, a protective framework that reinterprets the identification of malicious clients as an attributed graph clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:15:04Z)
• Combating Exacerbated Heterogeneity for Robust Models in Federated Learning [91.88122934924435]
  Combination of adversarial training and federated learning can lead to the undesired robustness deterioration. We propose a novel framework called Slack Federated Adversarial Training (SFAT) We verify the rationality and effectiveness of SFAT on various benchmarked and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T06:16:15Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• RobustFed: A Truth Inference Approach for Robust Federated Learning [9.316565110931743]
  Federated learning is a framework that enables clients to train a collaboratively global model under a central server's orchestration. The aggregation step in federated learning is vulnerable to adversarial attacks as the central server cannot manage clients' behavior. We propose a novel robust aggregation algorithm inspired by the truth inference methods in crowdsourcing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-18T09:34:57Z)
• Federated Learning with Unreliable Clients: Performance Analysis and Mechanism Design [76.29738151117583]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become a promising tool for training effective machine learning models among distributed clients. However, low quality models could be uploaded to the aggregator server by unreliable clients, leading to a degradation or even a collapse of training. We model these unreliable behaviors of clients and propose a defensive mechanism to mitigate such a security risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T08:02:27Z)
• Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentation [123.37082242750866]
  Federated learning has emerged as an important distributed learning paradigm, where a server aggregates a global model from many client-trained models while having no access to the client data. We propose a novel federated learning system that employs zero-shot data augmentation on under-represented data to mitigate statistical heterogeneity and encourage more uniform accuracy performance across clients in federated networks. We study two variants of this scheme, Fed-ZDAC (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the clients) and Fed-ZDAS (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the server).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T18:23:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.