Communication Enhances LLMs' Stability in Strategic Thinking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06081v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 17:12:52 GMT
• Title: Communication Enhances LLMs' Stability in Strategic Thinking
• Authors: Nunzio Lore, Babak Heydari,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate whether short, costless pre-play messages emulating the cheap-talk paradigm affect strategic stability.<n>We demonstrate consistent reductions in trajectory noise across a majority of the model-context pairings being studied.<n>While communication rarely produces harmful instability, we document a few context-specific exceptions and identify the limited domains in which communication harms stability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit pronounced context-dependent variability that undermines predictable multi-agent behavior in tasks requiring strategic thinking. Focusing on models that range from 7 to 9 billion parameters in size engaged in a ten-round repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, we evaluate whether short, costless pre-play messages emulating the cheap-talk paradigm affect strategic stability. Our analysis uses simulation-level bootstrap resampling and nonparametric inference to compare cooperation trajectories fitted with LOWESS regression across both the messaging and the no-messaging condition. We demonstrate consistent reductions in trajectory noise across a majority of the model-context pairings being studied. The stabilizing effect persists across multiple prompt variants and decoding regimes, though its magnitude depends on model choice and contextual framing, with models displaying higher baseline volatility gaining the most. While communication rarely produces harmful instability, we document a few context-specific exceptions and identify the limited domains in which communication harms stability. These findings position cheap-talk style communication as a low-cost, practical tool for improving the predictability and reliability of strategic behavior in multi-agent LLM systems.

Related papers

• Multi-Paradigm Collaborative Adversarial Attack Against Multi-Modal Large Language Models [67.45032003041399]
  We propose a novel Multi-Paradigm Collaborative Attack (MPCAttack) framework to boost the transferability of adversarial examples against MLLMs.<n>MPCO adaptively balances the importance of different paradigm representations and guides the global optimisation.<n>Our solution consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both targeted and untargeted attacks on open-source and closed-source MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T06:01:26Z)
• TopoCurate:Modeling Interaction Topology for Tool-Use Agent Training [53.93696896939915]
  Training tool-use agents typically rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on successful trajectories and Reinforcement Learning (RL) on pass-rate-selected tasks.<n>We propose TopoCurate, an interaction-aware framework that projects multi-trial rollouts from the same task into a unified semantic quotient topology.<n>TopoCurate achieves consistent gains of 4.2% (SFT) and 6.9% (RL) over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T10:38:54Z)
• Evaluating Zero-Shot and One-Shot Adaptation of Small Language Models in Leader-Follower Interaction [1.3511057160494195]
  Leader-follower interaction is an important paradigm in human-robot interaction (HRI)<n>Small language models (SLMs) offer a potential alternative, but their effectiveness for role classification in HRI has not been systematically evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T18:20:26Z)
• Strategy Executability in Mathematical Reasoning: Leveraging Human-Model Differences for Effective Guidance [86.46794021499511]
  We show a previously underexplored gap between strategy usage and strategy executability.<n>We propose Selective Strategy Retrieval (SSR), a test-time framework that explicitly models executability.<n> SSR yields reliable and consistent improvements over direct solving, in-context learning, and single-source guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T03:34:23Z)
• Mitigating Conversational Inertia in Multi-Turn Agents [47.35031006899519]
  We identify conversational inertia, a phenomenon where models exhibit strong diagonal attention to previous responses.<n>We propose Context Preference Learning to calibrate model preferences to favor low-inertia responses over highinertia ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T15:47:32Z)
• From Sparse Decisions to Dense Reasoning: A Multi-attribute Trajectory Paradigm for Multimodal Moderation [59.27094165576015]
  We propose a novel learning paradigm (UniMod) that transitions from sparse decision-making to dense reasoning traces.<n>By constructing structured trajectories encompassing evidence grounding, modality assessment, risk mapping, policy decision, and response generation, we reformulate monolithic decision tasks into a multi-dimensional boundary learning process.<n>We introduce specialized optimization strategies to decouple task-specific parameters and rebalance training dynamics, effectively resolving interference between diverse objectives in multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:29:40Z)
• Grounded Test-Time Adaptation for LLM Agents [75.62784644919803]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents struggle to generalize to novel and complex environments.<n>We propose two strategies for adapting LLM agents by leveraging environment-specific information available during deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T22:24:35Z)
• Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
  contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z)
• SALMAN: Stability Analysis of Language Models Through the Maps Between Graph-based Manifolds [11.373585987937913]
  We propose a unified, local (sample-level) robustness framework (SALMAN) that evaluates model stability without modifying internal parameters or resorting to complex perturbations.<n>Central to our approach is a novel Distance Mapping Distortion (DMD) measure, which ranks each sample's susceptibility by comparing input-to-output distance mappings in a near-linear manner.<n>By demonstrating significant gains in attack efficiency and robust training, we position our framework as a practical, model-agnostic tool for advancing the reliability of transformer-based NLP systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-23T02:50:55Z)
• Statistical Runtime Verification for LLMs via Robustness Estimation [0.0]
  Adversarial robustness verification is essential for ensuring the safe deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in runtime-critical applications.<n>This paper presents a case study adapting and extending the RoMA statistical verification framework to assess its feasibility as an online runtime robustness monitor for LLMs in black-box deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T16:36:19Z)
• Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness to Bias Elicitation in Large Language Models: Scalable Automated Assessment with LLM-as-a-Judge [1.1666234644810893]
  Small models outperform larger ones in safety, suggesting that training and architecture may matter more than scale.<n>No model is fully robust to adversarial elicitation, with jailbreak attacks using low-resource languages or refusal suppression proving effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:00:59Z)
• Evaluating Concurrent Robustness of Language Models Across Diverse Challenge Sets [46.19529338280716]
  Language models, characterized by their black-box nature, often hallucinate and display sensitivity to input perturbations.<n>We introduce a methodology designed to examine how input perturbations affect language models across various scales.<n>We present three distinct fine-tuning strategies to address robustness against multiple perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T02:59:10Z)
• Multi-Agent Adversarial Attacks for Multi-Channel Communications [24.576538640840976]
  We propose a multi-agent adversary system (MAAS) for modeling and analyzing adversaries in a wireless communication scenario. By modeling the adversaries as learning agents, we show that the proposed MAAS is able to successfully choose the transmitted channel(s) and their respective allocated power(s) without any prior knowledge of the sender strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-22T23:57:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.