Can LLMs Discern the Traits Influencing Your Preferences? Evaluating Personality-Driven Preference Alignment in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07181v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 20:37:02 GMT
• Title: Can LLMs Discern the Traits Influencing Your Preferences? Evaluating Personality-Driven Preference Alignment in LLMs
• Authors: Tianyu Zhao, Siqi Li, Yasser Shoukry, Salma Elmalaki,
• Abstract summary: We study personality as a principled ''latent'' signal behind preference statements.<n>We find that conditioning on personality-aligned preferences substantially improves personalized question answering.<n>We propose a framework that enables an LLM model to automatically retrieve personality-aligned preferences and incorporate them during answer generation.
• Score: 10.04942779683801
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: User preferences are increasingly used to personalize Large Language Model (LLM) responses, yet how to reliably leverage preference signals for answer generation remains under-explored. In practice, preferences can be noisy, incomplete, or even misleading, which can degrade answer quality when applied naively. Motivated by the observation that stable personality traits shape everyday preferences, we study personality as a principled ''latent'' signal behind preference statements. Through extensive experiments, we find that conditioning on personality-aligned preferences substantially improves personalized question answering: selecting preferences consistent with a user's inferred personality increases answer-choice accuracy from 29.25% to 76%, compared to using randomly selected preferences. Based on these findings, we introduce PACIFIC (Preference Alignment Choices Inference for Five-factor Identity Characterization), a personality-labeled preference dataset containing 1200 preference statements spanning diverse domains (e.g., travel, movies, education), annotated with Big-Five (OCEAN) trait directions. Finally, we propose a framework that enables an LLM model to automatically retrieve personality-aligned preferences and incorporate them during answer generation.

Related papers

• Towards Realistic Personalization: Evaluating Long-Horizon Preference Following in Personalized User-LLM Interactions [50.70965714314064]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users share complex and diverse preferences over extended interactions.<n>This work proposes RealPref, a benchmark for evaluating realistic preference-following in personalized user-LLM interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T15:42:43Z)
• Robust Preference Alignment via Directional Neighborhood Consensus [13.313830197011983]
  We introduce Robust Preference Selection (RPS), a post-hoc, training-free method by leveraging directional neighborhood consensus.<n>RPS samples multiple responses from a local neighborhood of related preferences to create a superior candidate pool.<n>Our work presents a practical, theoretically-grounded solution for enhancing the reliability of preference-aligned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T12:39:20Z)
• Is Active Persona Inference Necessary for Aligning Small Models to Personal Preferences? [16.12440288407791]
  A popular trend is adding a prefix to the current user's conversation to steer preference distribution.<n>Most methods passively model personal preferences with prior example preferences pairs.<n>We ask whether models benefit from actively inferring preference descriptions.<n>We then test how effective finetuned 1-8B size models are at inferring and aligning to personal preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:39:48Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization [122.54846260663922]
  ComPO is a method to personalize preference optimization in language models. We collect and release ComPRed, a question answering dataset with community-level preferences from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T14:02:40Z)
• PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences [11.717169516971856]
  We present a public benchmark, PersonalLLM, focusing on adapting LLMs to provide maximal benefits for a particular user.<n>We curate open-ended prompts paired with many high-quality answers over which users would be expected to display heterogeneous latent preferences.<n>Our dataset and generated personalities offer an innovative testbed for developing personalization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T13:55:42Z)
• Geometric-Averaged Preference Optimization for Soft Preference Labels [78.2746007085333]
  Many algorithms for aligning LLMs with human preferences assume that human preferences are binary and deterministic.<n>In this work, we introduce the distributional soft preference labels and improve Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with a weighted geometric average of the LLM output likelihood in the loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T17:54:28Z)
• Personality Alignment of Large Language Models [30.710131188931317]
  Personality Alignment aims to align large language models with individual user preferences.<n>This dataset includes data from over 320,000 real subjects across multiple personality assessments.<n>We develop an activation intervention optimization method to efficiently align with individual behavioral preferences.<n>Our work paves the way for future AI systems to make decisions and reason in truly personality ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T17:09:00Z)
• Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment [72.99676237703099]
  We propose a new framework that boosts the alignment of large language models with human preferences.<n>Our key idea is leveraging the human prior knowledge within the small (seed) data.<n>We introduce a noise-aware preference learning algorithm to mitigate the risk of low quality within generated preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T18:01:02Z)
• Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences [80.55271307662365]
  We find that humans are less sensitive to errors, favor responses that support their stances, and show clear dislike when models admit their limits. advanced LLMs like GPT-4-Turbo emphasize correctness, clarity, and harmlessness more. We show that preference-based evaluation can be intentionally manipulated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T14:34:31Z)
• Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts [95.09994361995389]
  Relative Preference Optimization (RPO) is designed to discern between more and less preferred responses derived from both identical and related prompts. RPO has demonstrated a superior ability to align large language models with user preferences and to improve their adaptability during the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T22:47:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.