PreFlect: From Retrospective to Prospective Reflection in Large Language Model Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07187v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 20:42:44 GMT
• Title: PreFlect: From Retrospective to Prospective Reflection in Large Language Model Agents
• Authors: Hanyu Wang, Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen,
• Abstract summary: We introduce PreFlect, a prospective reflection mechanism that shifts the paradigm from post hoc correction to pre-execution foresight.<n>We distill planning errors from historical agent trajectories, capturing recurring success and failure patterns observed across past executions.
• Score: 30.225072803272273
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Advanced large language model agents typically adopt self-reflection for improving performance, where agents iteratively analyze past actions to correct errors. However, existing reflective approaches are inherently retrospective: agents act, observe failure, and only then attempt to recover. In this work, we introduce PreFlect, a prospective reflection mechanism that shifts the paradigm from post hoc correction to pre-execution foresight by criticizing and refining agent plans before execution. To support grounded prospective reflection, we distill planning errors from historical agent trajectories, capturing recurring success and failure patterns observed across past executions. Furthermore, we complement prospective reflection with a dynamic re-planning mechanism that provides execution-time plan update in case the original plan encounters unexpected deviation. Evaluations on different benchmarks demonstrate that PreFlect significantly improves overall agent utility on complex real-world tasks, outperforming strong reflection-based baselines and several more complex agent architectures. Code will be updated at https://github.com/wwwhy725/PreFlect.

Related papers

• Learning from Trials and Errors: Reflective Test-Time Planning for Embodied LLMs [63.88783817420284]
  Embodied robots cannot reflect on what went wrong or why, turning deployment into a sequence of independent trials.<n>We introduce Reflective Test-Time Planning, which integrates two modes of reflection: textitreflection-in-action and textitreflection-on-action<n>We also include retrospective reflection, allowing the agent to re-evaluate earlier decisions and perform model updates with hindsight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T18:55:18Z)
• Position: Beyond Model-Centric Prediction -- Agentic Time Series Forecasting [49.05788441962762]
  We argue for agentic time series forecasting (ATSF), which reframes forecasting as an agentic process composed of perception, planning, action, reflection, and memory.<n>We outline three representative implementation paradigms -- workflow-based design, agentic reinforcement learning, and a hybrid agentic workflow paradigm -- and discuss the opportunities and challenges that arise when shifting from model-centric prediction to agentic forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T08:01:11Z)
• PROMISE: Process Reward Models Unlock Test-Time Scaling Laws in Generative Recommendations [52.67948063133533]
  Generative Recommendation has emerged as a promising paradigm, reformulating recommendation as a sequence-to-sequence generation task over hierarchical Semantic IDs.<n>Existing methods suffer from a critical issue we term Semantic Drift, where errors in early, high-level tokens irreversibly divert the generation trajectory into irrelevant semantic subspaces.<n>We propose Promise, a novel framework that integrates dense, step-by-step verification into generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T07:38:46Z)
• Current Agents Fail to Leverage World Model as Tool for Foresight [61.82522354207919]
  Generative world models offer a promising remedy: agents could use them to foresee outcomes before acting.<n>This paper empirically examines whether current agents can leverage such world models as tools to enhance their cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T13:15:23Z)
• Generative Actor Critic [74.04971271003869]
  Generative Actor Critic (GAC) is a novel framework that decouples sequential decision-making by reframing textitpolicy evaluation as learning a generative model of the joint distribution over trajectories and returns.<n>Experiments on Gym-MuJoCo and Maze2D benchmarks demonstrate GAC's strong offline performance and significantly enhanced offline-to-online improvement compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T06:31:11Z)
• MIRROR: Multi-agent Intra- and Inter-Reflection for Optimized Reasoning in Tool Learning [33.009759731505746]
  Complex tasks involving tool integration pose significant challenges for Large Language Models.<n> Reflection has emerged as an effective strategy for correcting erroneous trajectories in agentic benchmarks.<n>We propose MIRROR, a framework that consists of both intra-reflection, which critically assesses intended actions before execution, and inter-reflection, which further adjusts the trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T03:37:33Z)
• TRACE: A Self-Improving Framework for Robot Behavior Forecasting with Vision-Language Models [1.3408365072149797]
  Predicting the near-term behavior of a reactive agent is crucial in many robotic scenarios.<n>We present TRACE, an inference framework that couples tree-of-thought generation with domain-aware feedback.<n>We validate TRACE on both ground-vehicle simulations and real-world marine autonomous surface vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T06:58:02Z)
• Agent-R: Training Language Model Agents to Reflect via Iterative Self-Training [18.896813839389893]
  We propose an iterative self-training framework, Agent-R, that enables language Agent to Reflect on the fly.<n>Unlike traditional methods that reward or penalize actions based on correctness, Agent-R leverages MCTS to construct training data that recover correct trajectories from erroneous ones.<n>Our findings demonstrate that Agent-R continuously improves the model's ability to recover from errors and enables timely error correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T11:46:04Z)
• Rejecting Hallucinated State Targets during Planning [84.179112256683]
  In planning processes, generative or predictive models are often used to propose "targets" representing sets of expected or desirable states.<n>Unfortunately, learned models inevitably hallucinate infeasible targets that can cause delusional behaviors and safety concerns.<n>We devise a strategy to identify and reject infeasible targets by learning a target feasibility evaluator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:35:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.