Fin-RATE: A Real-world Financial Analytics and Tracking Evaluation Benchmark for LLMs on SEC Filings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07294v3
• Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 01:04:07 GMT
• Title: Fin-RATE: A Real-world Financial Analytics and Tracking Evaluation Benchmark for LLMs on SEC Filings
• Abstract summary: Fin-RATE is a benchmark built on U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and mirroring financial analyst.<n>We benchmark 17 leading Large Language Models (LLMs) across open-source, closed-source, and finance-specialized models.<n>Results show substantial performance degradation, with accuracy dropping by 18.60% and 14.35% as tasks shift from single-document reasoning to longitudinal and cross-entity analysis.
• Score: 31.87459935714186
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the increasing deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the finance domain, LLMs are increasingly expected to parse complex regulatory disclosures. However, existing benchmarks often focus on isolated details, failing to reflect the complexity of professional analysis that requires synthesizing information across multiple documents, reporting periods, and corporate entities. Furthermore, these benchmarks do not disentangle whether errors arise from retrieval failures, generation inaccuracies, domain-specific reasoning mistakes, or misinterpretation of the query or context, making it difficult to precisely diagnose performance bottlenecks. To bridge these gaps, we introduce Fin-RATE, a benchmark built on U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and mirroring financial analyst workflows through three pathways: detail-oriented reasoning within individual disclosures, cross-entity comparison under shared topics, and longitudinal tracking of the same firm across reporting periods. We benchmark 17 leading LLMs, spanning open-source, closed-source, and finance-specialized models, under both ground-truth context and retrieval-augmented settings. Results show substantial performance degradation, with accuracy dropping by 18.60\% and 14.35\% as tasks shift from single-document reasoning to longitudinal and cross-entity analysis. This degradation is driven by increased comparison hallucinations, temporal and entity mismatches, and is further reflected in declines in reasoning quality and factual consistency--limitations that existing benchmarks have yet to formally categorize or quantify.

Related papers

• METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models [61.33372454250959]
  Contextual causal reasoning is a critical yet challenging capability for Large Language Models.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to ensure context consistency or cover the full causal hierarchy.<n>We pioneer METER to systematically benchmark LLMs across all three levels of the causal ladder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T14:07:11Z)
• From Comprehension to Reasoning: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Automated Financial Research Reporting [19.0993436440595]
  FinReasoning is a benchmark that decomposes Chinese research-report generation into three stages aligned with real analyst.<n>Based on the evaluation results, FinReasoning reveals that most models exhibit a understanding-execution gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T13:44:58Z)
• TSAQA: Time Series Analysis Question And Answering Benchmark [85.35545785252309]
  Time series data are integral to critical applications across domains such as finance, healthcare, transportation, and environmental science.<n>We introduce TSAQA, a novel unified benchmark designed to broaden task coverage and evaluate diverse temporal analysis capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T17:28:56Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Benchmarking Infrastructure for LLMs In Software Engineering [19.584762693453893]
  BEHELM is a holistic benchmarking infrastructure that unifies software-scenario specification with multi-metric evaluation.<n>Our goal is to reduce the overhead currently required to construct benchmarks while enabling a fair, realistic, and future-proof assessment of LLMs in software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T21:55:10Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Stage-wise Benchmarking of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking [64.97768177044355]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world fact-checking systems.<n>We present FactArena, a fully automated arena-style evaluation framework.<n>Our analyses reveal significant discrepancies between static claim-verification accuracy and end-to-end fact-checking competence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T02:51:56Z)
• Enhancing Business Analytics through Hybrid Summarization of Financial Reports [0.152292571922932]
  Financial reports and earnings communications contain large volumes of structured and semi structured information.<n>We present a hybrid summarization framework that combines extractive and abstractive techniques to produce concise and factually reliable summaries.<n>These findings support the development of practical summarization systems for distilling lengthy financial texts into usable business insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T16:25:12Z)
• Understanding Structured Financial Data with LLMs: A Case Study on Fraud Detection [17.04809129025246]
  FinFRE-RAG is a two-stage approach that applies importance-guided feature reduction to serialize a compact subset of numeric/categorical attributes into natural language.<n>LLMs can produce human-readable explanations and facilitate feature analysis, potentially reducing the manual workload of fraud analysts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T07:09:11Z)
• FinLFQA: Evaluating Attributed Text Generation of LLMs in Financial Long-Form Question Answering [57.43420753842626]
  FinLFQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to generate long-form answers to complex financial questions.<n>We provide an automatic evaluation framework covering both answer quality and attribution quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T20:06:15Z)
• FinAgentBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Agentic Retrieval in Financial Question Answering [57.18367828883773]
  FinAgentBench is a benchmark for evaluating agentic retrieval with multi-step reasoning in finance.<n>The benchmark consists of 26K expert-annotated examples on S&P-500 listed firms.<n>We evaluate a suite of state-of-the-art models and demonstrate how targeted fine-tuning can significantly improve agentic retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T22:15:22Z)
• Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis [62.388554963415906]
  In finance, Large Language Models (LLMs) face frequent knowledge conflicts arising from discrepancies between their pre-trained parametric knowledge and real-time market data.<n>These conflicts are especially problematic in real-world investment services, where a model's inherent biases can misalign with institutional objectives.<n>We propose an experimental framework to investigate emergent behaviors in such conflict scenarios, offering a quantitative analysis of bias in investment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T16:09:38Z)
• IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis [60.32962597618861]
  IDA-Bench is a novel benchmark evaluating large language models in multi-round interactive scenarios.<n>Agent performance is judged by comparing its final numerical output to the human-derived baseline.<n>Even state-of-the-art coding agents (like Claude-3.7-thinking) succeed on 50% of the tasks, highlighting limitations not evident in single-turn tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T09:37:52Z)
• Quantifying Qualitative Insights: Leveraging LLMs to Market Predict [0.0]
  This study addresses challenges by leveraging daily reports from securities firms to create high-quality contextual information. The reports are segmented into text-based key factors and combined with numerical data, such as price information, to form context sets. A crafted prompt is designed to assign scores to the key factors, converting qualitative insights into quantitative results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T07:45:40Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.