Scalable and Reliable State-Aware Inference of High-Impact N-k Contingencies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09461v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 06:55:59 GMT
- Title: Scalable and Reliable State-Aware Inference of High-Impact N-k Contingencies
- Authors: Lihao Mai, Chenhan Xiao, Yang Weng,
- Abstract summary: Exhaustive evaluation of all outage combinations using AC power-flow or ACOPF is infeasible in routine operation.<n>This paper proposes a scalable, state-aware contingency inference framework designed to directly generate high-impact $N!-!k$ outage scenarios.
- Score: 4.588028371034407
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Increasing penetration of inverter-based resources, flexible loads, and rapidly changing operating conditions make higher-order $N\!-\!k$ contingency assessment increasingly important but computationally prohibitive. Exhaustive evaluation of all outage combinations using AC power-flow or ACOPF is infeasible in routine operation. This fact forces operators to rely on heuristic screening methods whose ability to consistently retain all critical contingencies is not formally established. This paper proposes a scalable, state-aware contingency inference framework designed to directly generate high-impact $N\!-\!k$ outage scenarios without enumerating the combinatorial contingency space. The framework employs a conditional diffusion model to produce candidate contingencies tailored to the current operating state, while a topology-aware graph neural network trained only on base and $N\!-\!1$ cases efficiently constructs high-risk training samples offline. Finally, the framework is developed to provide controllable coverage guarantees for severe contingencies, allowing operators to explicitly manage the risk of missing critical events under limited AC power-flow evaluation budgets. Experiments on IEEE benchmark systems show that, for a given evaluation budget, the proposed approach consistently evaluates higher-severity contingencies than uniform sampling. This allows critical outages to be identified more reliably with reduced computational effort.
Related papers
- Conformal Thinking: Risk Control for Reasoning on a Compute Budget [60.65072883773352]
Reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs) enable test-time scaling, with dataset-level accuracy improving as the token budget increases.<n>We re-frame the budget setting problem as risk control, limiting the error rate while minimizing compute.<n>Our framework introduces an upper threshold that stops reasoning when the model is confident and a novel lower threshold that preemptively stops unsolvable instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T18:17:22Z) - Not All Preferences Are Created Equal: Stability-Aware and Gradient-Efficient Alignment for Reasoning Models [52.48582333951919]
We propose a dynamic framework designed to enhance alignment reliability by maximizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of policy updates.<n>SAGE (Stability-Aware Gradient Efficiency) integrates a coarse-grained curriculum mechanism that refreshes candidate pools based on model competence.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly accelerates convergence and outperforms static baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T12:56:10Z) - Enhanced-FQL($λ$), an Efficient and Interpretable RL with novel Fuzzy Eligibility Traces and Segmented Experience Replay [0.0]
Enhanced-FQL($$) achieves superior sample efficiency and reduced variance compared to n-step fuzzy TD and fuzzyA($$) baselines.<n>The framework's inherent interpretability, combined with its computational efficiency and theoretical convergence guarantees, makes it suitable for safety-critical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T20:59:18Z) - Reliable LLM-Based Edge-Cloud-Expert Cascades for Telecom Knowledge Systems [54.916243942641444]
Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as key enablers of automation in domains such as telecommunications.<n>We study an edge-cloud-expert cascaded LLM-based knowledge system that supports decision-making through a question-and-answer pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T03:10:09Z) - Distributionally Robust Safety Verification of Neural Networks via Worst-Case CVaR [3.0458514384586404]
This paper builds on Fazlyab's quadratic-constraint (QC) and semidefinite-programming (SDP) framework for neural network verification.<n>The integration broadens input-uncertainty geometry-covering ellipsoids, polytopes, and hyperplanes-and extends applicability to safety-critical domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T07:04:53Z) - Additive Distributionally Robust Ranking and Selection [0.8283940114367679]
We propose a simple additive allocation (AA) procedure that aims to exclusively sample the $k + m - 1$ previously hypothesized critical scenarios.<n>We prove that AA is consistent and, surprisingly, achieves additivity in the strongest sense.<n>Results offer new and counterintuitive insights into the additive structure of DRR&S.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-07T17:36:29Z) - Probabilistically Tightened Linear Relaxation-based Perturbation Analysis for Neural Network Verification [83.25968588249776]
We present a novel framework that combines over-approximation techniques from LiRPA-based approaches with a sampling-based method to compute tight intermediate reachable sets.<n>With negligible computational overhead, $textttPT-LiRPA$ exploiting the estimated reachable sets, significantly tightens the lower and upper linear bounds of a neural network's output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T18:45:53Z) - COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z) - Fast and Reliable $N-k$ Contingency Screening with Input-Convex Neural Networks [3.490170135411753]
Power system operators must ensure that dispatch decisions remain feasible in case of grid outages or contingencies to prevent failures and ensure reliable operation.
Check the feasibility of all $N - k$ contingencies is intractable for even small $k$ grid components.
In this work, we propose use input- cascading neural networks (ICNNs) for contingency screening.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T15:38:09Z) - IBP Regularization for Verified Adversarial Robustness via
Branch-and-Bound [85.6899802468343]
We present IBP-R, a novel verified training algorithm that is both simple effective.
We also present UPB, a novel robustness based on $beta$-CROWN, that reduces the cost state-of-the-art branching algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T17:13:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.