Context-Aware Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Gender Bias Mitigation in Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09590v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:45:21 GMT
• Title: Context-Aware Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Gender Bias Mitigation in Language Models
• Authors: Shweta Parihar, Liu Guangliang, Natalie Parde, Lu Cheng,
• Abstract summary: A challenge in mitigating social bias in fine-tuned language models (LMs) is the potential reduction in language modeling capability.<n>We propose a context-augmented data augmentation method, Context-CDA, which uses large LMs to enhance the diversity and contextual relevance of the debiasing corpus.<n>We then employ uncertainty-based filtering to exclude generated counterfactuals considered low-quality by the target smaller LMs.
• Score: 14.937360204897415
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A challenge in mitigating social bias in fine-tuned language models (LMs) is the potential reduction in language modeling capability, which can harm downstream performance. Counterfactual data augmentation (CDA), a widely used method for fine-tuning, highlights this issue by generating synthetic data that may align poorly with real-world distributions or creating overly simplistic counterfactuals that ignore the social context of altered sensitive attributes (e.g., gender) in the pretraining corpus. To address these limitations, we propose a simple yet effective context-augmented CDA method, Context-CDA, which uses large LMs to enhance the diversity and contextual relevance of the debiasing corpus. By minimizing discrepancies between the debiasing corpus and pretraining data through augmented context, this approach ensures better alignment, enhancing language modeling capability. We then employ uncertainty-based filtering to exclude generated counterfactuals considered low-quality by the target smaller LMs (i.e., LMs to be debiased), further improving the fine-tuning corpus quality. Experimental results on gender bias benchmarks demonstrate that Context-CDA effectively mitigates bias without sacrificing language modeling performance while offering insights into social biases by analyzing distribution shifts in next-token generation probabilities.

Related papers

• Leveraging Robust Optimization for LLM Alignment under Distribution Shifts [51.74394601039711]
  Preference alignment methods are increasingly critical for steering large language models to generate outputs consistent with human values.<n>We propose a novel distribution-aware optimization framework that improves preference alignment despite such shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T09:14:38Z)
• Refining Sentence Embedding Model through Ranking Sentences Generation with Large Language Models [60.00178316095646]
  Sentence embedding is essential for many NLP tasks, with contrastive learning methods achieving strong performance using datasets like NLI.<n>Recent studies leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate sentence pairs, reducing annotation dependency.<n>We propose a method for controlling the generation direction of LLMs in the latent space. Unlike unconstrained generation, the controlled approach ensures meaningful semantic divergence.<n> Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves new SOTA performance with a modest cost in ranking sentence synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T12:07:53Z)
• Bridging the Fairness Gap: Enhancing Pre-trained Models with LLM-Generated Sentences [8.979854959662664]
  We propose enhancing fairness (Fair-Gender) in pre-trained language models (PLMs) by absorbing coherent, attribute-balanced, and semantically rich sentences.<n>These sentences cannot be directly used for debiasing due to alignment issues and the risk of negative transfer.<n>We address this by applying causal analysis to estimate causal effects, filtering out unaligned sentences, and identifying aligned ones for incorporation into PLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T12:32:43Z)
• Towards Resource Efficient and Interpretable Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models [1.787433808079955]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to perpetuate unwanted biases in training data.<n>In this paper, we mitigate bias by leveraging small biased and anti-biased expert models to obtain a debiasing signal.<n> Experiments on mitigating gender, race, and religion biases show a reduction in bias on several local and global bias metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T16:56:08Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Models [52.52955281662332]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases.<n>FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance.<n>This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Optimizing Language Models for Human Preferences is a Causal Inference Problem [41.59906798328058]
  We present an initial exploration of language model optimization for human preferences from direct outcome datasets. We first propose that language model optimization should be viewed as a causal problem to ensure that the model correctly learns the relationship between the text and the outcome. We extend CPO with doubly robust CPO, which reduces the variance of the surrogate objective while retaining provably strong guarantees on bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T21:36:07Z)
• Large Language Models can Contrastively Refine their Generation for Better Sentence Representation Learning [57.74233319453229]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a groundbreaking technology and their unparalleled text generation capabilities have sparked interest in their application to the fundamental sentence representation learning task. We propose MultiCSR, a multi-level contrastive sentence representation learning framework that decomposes the process of prompting LLMs to generate a corpus. Our experiments reveal that MultiCSR enables a less advanced LLM to surpass the performance of ChatGPT, while applying it to ChatGPT achieves better state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T03:21:43Z)
• Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distance [55.89964205594829]
  The standard paradigm of neural language generation adopts maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) as the optimizing method. We develop practical bounds to apply it to language generation. We introduce the TaiLr objective that balances the tradeoff of estimating TVD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T16:32:52Z)
• Unified Detoxifying and Debiasing in Language Generation via Inference-time Adaptive Optimization [32.50246008433889]
  Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have prospered in various natural language generation (NLG) tasks due to their ability to generate fairly fluent text. These models are observed to capture and reproduce harmful contents in training corpora, typically toxic language and social biases, raising severe moral issues. We propose the first unified framework of detoxifying and debiasing called UDDIA, which jointly formalizes these two problems as rectifying the output space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T08:45:25Z)
• Power of Explanations: Towards automatic debiasing in hate speech detection [19.26084350822197]
  Hate speech detection is a common downstream application of natural language processing (NLP) in the real world. We propose an automatic misuse detector (MiD) relying on an explanation method for detecting potential bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T14:14:03Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Improving Robustness by Augmenting Training Sentences with Predicate-Argument Structures [62.562760228942054]
  Existing approaches to improve robustness against dataset biases mostly focus on changing the training objective. We propose to augment the input sentences in the training data with their corresponding predicate-argument structures. We show that without targeting a specific bias, our sentence augmentation improves the robustness of transformer models against multiple biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T16:22:05Z)
• A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Data Augmentation Approach for Natural Language Understanding and Generation [53.8171136907856]
  We introduce a set of simple yet effective data augmentation strategies dubbed cutoff. cutoff relies on sampling consistency and thus adds little computational overhead. cutoff consistently outperforms adversarial training and achieves state-of-the-art results on the IWSLT2014 German-English dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T07:08:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.