Training-Induced Bias Toward LLM-Generated Content in Dense Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10833v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:20:25 GMT
• Title: Training-Induced Bias Toward LLM-Generated Content in Dense Retrieval
• Authors: William Xion, Wolfgang Nejdl,
• Abstract summary: Reports claim a broad preference for text generated by large language models (LLMs)<n>In this study, we trace the emergence of such preferences across training stages and data sources.<n>Our study demonstrates that source bias is a training-induced phenomenon rather than an inherent property of dense retrievers.
• Score: 6.771568584669793
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Dense retrieval is a promising approach for acquiring relevant context or world knowledge in open-domain natural language processing tasks and is now widely used in information retrieval applications. However, recent reports claim a broad preference for text generated by large language models (LLMs). This bias is called "source bias", and it has been hypothesized that lower perplexity contributes to this effect. In this study, we revisit this claim by conducting a controlled evaluation to trace the emergence of such preferences across training stages and data sources. Using parallel human- and LLM-generated counterparts of the SciFact and Natural Questions (NQ320K) datasets, we compare unsupervised checkpoints with models fine-tuned using in-domain human text, in-domain LLM-generated text, and MS MARCO. Our results show the following: 1) Unsupervised retrievers do not exhibit a uniform pro-LLM preference. The direction and magnitude depend on the dataset. 2) Across the settings tested, supervised fine-tuning on MS MARCO consistently shifts the rankings toward LLM-generated text. 3) In-domain fine-tuning produces dataset-specific and inconsistent shifts in preference. 4) Fine-tuning on LLM-generated corpora induces a pronounced pro-LLM bias. Finally, a retriever-centric perplexity probe involving the reattachment of a language modeling head to the fine-tuned dense retriever encoder indicates agreement with relevance near chance, thereby weakening the explanatory power of perplexity. Our study demonstrates that source bias is a training-induced phenomenon rather than an inherent property of dense retrievers.

Related papers

• How Do LLM-Generated Texts Impact Term-Based Retrieval Models? [76.92519309816008]
  This paper investigates the influence of large language models (LLMs) on term-based retrieval models.<n>Our linguistic analysis reveals that LLM-generated texts exhibit smoother high-frequency and steeper low-frequency Zipf slopes.<n>Our study further explores whether term-based retrieval models demonstrate source bias, concluding that these models prioritize documents whose term distributions closely correspond to those of the queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T06:43:27Z)
• Maximally-Informative Retrieval for State Space Model Generation [59.954191072042526]
  We introduce Retrieval In-Context Optimization (RICO) to minimize model uncertainty for a particular query at test-time.<n>Unlike traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which relies on externals for document retrieval, our approach leverages direct feedback from the model.<n>We show that standard top-$k$ retrieval with model gradients can approximate our optimization procedure, and provide connections to the leave-one-out loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T18:08:54Z)
• Hey, That's My Data! Label-Only Dataset Inference in Large Language Models [63.35066172530291]
  CatShift is a label-only dataset-inference framework.<n>It capitalizes on catastrophic forgetting: the tendency of an LLM to overwrite previously learned knowledge when exposed to new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T13:02:59Z)
• Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
  We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that fine-tuning text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy.<n>We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z)
• Invar-RAG: Invariant LLM-aligned Retrieval for Better Generation [43.630437906898635]
  We propose a novel two-stage fine-tuning architecture called Invar-RAG. In the retrieval stage, an LLM-based retriever is constructed by integrating LoRA-based representation learning. In the generation stage, a refined fine-tuning method is employed to improve LLM accuracy in generating answers based on retrieved information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:25:37Z)
• Robustness of Large Language Models to Perturbations in Text [2.2734015467359217]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance, but can they handle the inevitable noise in real-world data?<n>This work tackles this critical question by investigating LLMs' resilience against morphological variations in text.<n>Our findings show that contrary to popular beliefs, generative LLMs are quiet robust to noisy perturbations in text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T04:50:17Z)
• DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
  We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity. Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data. Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z)
• Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment [88.56809269990625]
  We propose a bilevel objective optimistically biased towards potentially high-reward responses to actively explore out-of-distribution regions. Our experimental results demonstrate that when fine-tuned on Zephyr-7B-SFT and Llama-3-8B-Instruct models, Self-Exploring Language Models (SELM) significantly boosts the performance on instruction-following benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:59:07Z)
• Self-Supervised Position Debiasing for Large Language Models [39.261233221850155]
  We propose a self-supervised position debiasing (SOD) framework to mitigate position bias for large language models (LLMs) Experiments on eight datasets and five tasks show that SOD consistently outperforms existing methods in mitigating three types of position biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T14:12:41Z)
• Neural Retrievers are Biased Towards LLM-Generated Content [35.40318940303482]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the paradigm of information retrieval (IR) applications. How these LLM-generated documents influence the IR systems is a pressing and still unexplored question. Surprisingly, our findings indicate that neural retrieval models tend to rank LLM-generated documents higher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T14:42:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.