AMPS: Adaptive Modality Preference Steering via Functional Entropy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12533v1
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 02:29:06 GMT
- Title: AMPS: Adaptive Modality Preference Steering via Functional Entropy
- Authors: Zihan Huang, Xintong Li, Rohan Surana, Tong Yu, Rui Wang, Julian McAuley, Jingbo Shang, Junda Wu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce an instance-aware diagnostic metric that quantifies each modality's information contribution and reveals sample-specific susceptibility to steering.<n> Experimental results show that our instance-aware steering outperforms conventional steering in modulating modality preference.
- Score: 66.69992693275061
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often exhibit significant modality preference, which is a tendency to favor one modality over another. Depending on the input, they may over-rely on linguistic priors relative to visual evidence, or conversely over-attend to visually salient but facts in textual contexts. Prior work has applied a uniform steering intensity to adjust the modality preference of MLLMs. However, strong steering can impair standard inference and increase error rates, whereas weak steering is often ineffective. In addition, because steering sensitivity varies substantially across multimodal instances, a single global strength is difficult to calibrate. To address this limitation with minimal disruption to inference, we introduce an instance-aware diagnostic metric that quantifies each modality's information contribution and reveals sample-specific susceptibility to steering. Building on these insights, we propose a scaling strategy that reduces steering for sensitive samples and a learnable module that infers scaling patterns, enabling instance-aware control of modality preference. Experimental results show that our instance-aware steering outperforms conventional steering in modulating modality preference, achieving effective adjustment while keeping generation error rates low.
Related papers
- Steering and Rectifying Latent Representation Manifolds in Frozen Multi-modal LLMs for Video Anomaly Detection [52.5174167737992]
Video anomaly detection (VAD) aims to identify abnormal events in videos.<n>We propose SteerVAD, which advances MLLM-based VAD by shifting from passively reading to actively steering and rectifying internal representations.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance among tuning-free approaches requiring only 1% of training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T13:48:50Z) - Why Steering Works: Toward a Unified View of Language Model Parameter Dynamics [81.80010043113445]
Local weight fine-tuning, LoRA-based adaptation, and activation-based interventions are studied in isolation.<n>We present a unified view that frames these interventions as dynamic weight updates induced by a control signal.<n>Across methods, we observe a consistent trade-off between preference and utility: stronger control increases preference while predictably reducing utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T17:04:36Z) - One-shot Optimized Steering Vector for Hallucination Mitigation for VLMs [8.089908150148554]
Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on multimodal tasks but still suffer from hallucination and safety-related failures.<n>We propose textbfOSGA (textbfOne-shot textbfSteering with textbfGenerative textbfAnchor), an input-independent framework that improves model performance with a single optimization instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T14:47:59Z) - Steering Language Models Before They Speak: Logit-Level Interventions [9.055997973281919]
We propose a training-free inference-time logit intervention for controllable generation.<n>Our results show that statistically grounded logit steering can achieve large, consistent, and multi-task control gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T03:00:33Z) - ATLAS: Adaptive Test-Time Latent Steering with External Verifiers for Enhancing LLMs Reasoning [13.073472989807675]
We propose Adaptive Test-time Latent Steering, called (ATLAS)<n>ATLAS dynamically controls steering decisions at inference time using an external, lightweight latent verifier.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that ATLAS consistently outperforms both vanilla decoding and fixed steering baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T15:27:24Z) - EasySteer: A Unified Framework for High-Performance and Extensible LLM Steering [55.56674028743782]
Large language model (LLM) steering has emerged as a promising paradigm for controlling model behavior at inference time.<n>We present EasySteer, a unified framework for high-performance, LLM steering built on vLLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T17:59:07Z) - GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs [56.93583799109029]
GrAInS is an inference-time steering approach that operates across both language-only and vision-language models and tasks.<n>During inference, GrAInS hidden activations at transformer layers guided by token-level attribution signals, and normalizes activations to preserve representational scale.<n>It consistently outperforms both fine-tuning and existing steering baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T02:34:13Z) - KV Cache Steering for Controlling Frozen LLMs [80.50365534625438]
cache steering is a lightweight method for implicit steering of language models.<n>We apply cache steering to induce chain-of-thought reasoning in small language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-11T17:59:36Z) - Guiding Giants: Lightweight Controllers for Weighted Activation Steering in LLMs [8.085475675888045]
Activation steering provides an alternative for inference-time control.<n>We introduce a novel approach using a lightweight, trainable controller network integrated during inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T01:48:38Z) - Mitigating Content Effects on Reasoning in Language Models through Fine-Grained Activation Steering [14.298418197820912]
Large language models (LLMs) frequently demonstrate reasoning limitations, often conflating content plausibility with logical validity.<n>This can result in biased inferences, where plausible arguments are incorrectly deemed logically valid or vice versa.<n>This paper investigates the problem of mitigating content biases on formal reasoning through activation steering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T01:34:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.