SCOPE: Selective Conformal Optimized Pairwise LLM Judging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13110v2
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:41:37 GMT
• Title: SCOPE: Selective Conformal Optimized Pairwise LLM Judging
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to replace costly human preference labels in pairwise evaluation.<n>Despite their practicality, LLM judges remain prone to miscalibration and systematic biases.<n>This paper proposes SCOPE, a framework for selective pairwise judging with finite-sample statistical guarantees.
• Score: 16.73004625486562
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to replace costly human preference labels in pairwise evaluation. Despite their practicality, LLM judges remain prone to miscalibration and systematic biases. This paper proposes SCOPE (Selective Conformal Optimized Pairwise Evaluation), a framework for selective pairwise judging with finite-sample statistical guarantees. Under exchangeability, SCOPE calibrates an acceptance threshold such that the error rate among non-abstained judgments is at most a user-specified level $α$. To provide SCOPE with a bias-neutral uncertainty signal, we introduce Bidirectional Preference Entropy (BPE), which queries the judge under both response positions, aggregates the implied preference probabilities to enforce invariance to response order, and converts the aggregated probability into an entropy-based uncertainty score. Across MT-Bench, RewardBench, and Chatbot Arena, BPE improves uncertainty quality over standard confidence proxies, providing a stronger selection signal that enables SCOPE to consistently meet the target risk level while retaining good coverage across judge scales. In particular, at $α= 0.10$, SCOPE consistently satisfies the risk bound across all benchmarks and judge scales (empirical risk $\approx 0.097$ to $0.099$), while retaining substantial coverage, reaching $0.89$ on RewardBench with Qwen-14B and $0.98$ on RewardBench with Qwen-32B. Compared to naïve baselines, SCOPE accepts up to $2.4\times$ more judgments on MT-Bench with Qwen-7B under the same target risk constraint, demonstrating that BPE enables reliable and high-coverage LLM-based evaluation.

Related papers

• CalibratedRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubric Banks for Open-Ended LLM Evaluation [11.869490719319577]
  CalibratedRubric is a task-adaptive framework that combines type-specific scoring, Bayesian rubric-measurability filtering, and item response theory (IRT)-based bank assembly.<n>Across financial, healthcare, general, and legal benchmarks, measurability filtering improves human-gold agreement.<n>IRT-based greedy selection improves cross-fitted rank fidelity over random selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T10:21:56Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Abstention in Large Language Models with Provable Alignment Guarantees [0.5371337604556311]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in question answering (QA) systems.<n>They may generate hallucinated or misaligned responses without reliable confidence estimates.<n>We propose CIC, a confidence-interval-based calibration framework that converts arbitrary uncertainty scores into risk-controlled selective answering rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T17:50:32Z)
• Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget [84.31744861038106]
  We formalize this question as *budgeted heteroskedastic multi-judge estimation*.<n>Given $K$ prompt-response pairs, $J$ judges with known costs, and unknown query-judge variances, the goal is to estimate a bounded score vector while minimizing an $ell_p$-error.<n>We prove that EST-IVWE matches the oracle IVWE rate up to lower-order terms in the budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T08:26:08Z)
• CriterAlign: Criterion-Centric Rationale Alignment for Code Preference Judging [95.02210956333374]
  We propose a criterion-centric framework that adapts rubric-based judging to pairwise preference evaluation.<n>On BigCodeReward, CriterAlign improves a Qwen2.5-VL-32B monolithic judge from 60.4% to 66.3% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T10:59:19Z)
• Prompt-Induced Score Variance in Zero-Shot Binary Vision-Language Safety Classification [43.86209535250233]
  Cross-prompt variance is strongly associated with prompt-level disagreement and higher error.<n>A training-free mean ensemble improves NLL on all 14 dataset-model evaluation pairs.<n>We frame this as a reliability stress test for zero-shot VLM first-token safety scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T01:06:30Z)
• Optimistic Feasible Search for Closed-Loop Fair Threshold Decision-Making [0.0]
  We study online learning of a one-dimensional threshold policy from bandit feedback.<n>We propose Optimistic Feasible Search (OFS), a simple grid-based method that maintains confidence bounds for reward and constraint residuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T10:44:40Z)
• ZIP-RC: Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Zero-Overhead Joint Reward-Cost Prediction [57.799425838564]
  We present ZIP-RC, an adaptive inference method that equips models with zero-overhead inference-time predictions of reward and cost.<n> ZIP-RC improves accuracy by up to 12% over majority voting at equal or lower average cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T09:44:31Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Probabilistic Forecasts for Safe Decision-Making via Conditional Value-at-Risk Planning [41.52380204321823]
  This paper presents the Uncertainty-Aware Markov Decision Process (UAMDP), a unified framework that couples Bayesian forecasting, posterior-sampling reinforcement learning, and planning.<n>We evaluate UAMDP in two domains-high-frequency equity trading and retail inventory control-both marked by structural uncertainty and economic volatility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T13:46:32Z)
• Reference-Free Rating of LLM Responses via Latent Information [53.463883683503106]
  We study the common practice of asking a judge model to assign Likert-scale scores to free-text responses.<n>We then propose and evaluate Latent Judges, which derive scalar ratings from internal model signals.<n>Across a broad suite of pairwise and single-rating benchmarks, latent methods match or surpass standard prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T12:15:52Z)
• Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
  We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z)
• TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them [58.04324690859212]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge) has revealed critical inconsistencies in current evaluation frameworks.<n>We identify two fundamental types of inconsistencies: Score-Comparison Inconsistency and Pairwise Transitivity Inconsistency.<n>We propose TrustJudge, a probabilistic framework that addresses these limitations through two key innovations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T13:04:29Z)
• Conformal P-Value in Multiple-Choice Question Answering Tasks with Provable Risk Control [0.0]
  This study introduces a significance testing-enhanced conformal prediction (CP) framework to improve trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs) in multiple-choice question answering (MCQA)<n>CP provides statistically rigorous marginal coverage guarantees for prediction sets, and significance testing offers established statistical rigor.<n>This work establishes a statistical framework for trustworthy LLM deployment in high-stakes QA applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T16:46:47Z)
• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification.<n>We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains.<n>This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)
• Decision from Suboptimal Classifiers: Excess Risk Pre- and Post-Calibration [52.70324949884702]
  We quantify the excess risk incurred using approximate posterior probabilities in batch binary decision-making.<n>We identify regimes where recalibration alone addresses most of the regret, and regimes where the regret is dominated by the grouping loss.<n>On NLP experiments, we show that these quantities identify when the expected gain of more advanced post-training is worth the operational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T10:52:36Z)
• Equal Opportunity of Coverage in Fair Regression [50.76908018786335]
  We study fair machine learning (ML) under predictive uncertainty to enable reliable and trustworthy decision-making. We propose Equal Opportunity of Coverage (EOC) that aims to achieve two properties: (1) coverage rates for different groups with similar outcomes are close, and (2) the coverage rate for the entire population remains at a predetermined level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T21:19:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.