Metaphors' journeys across time and genre: tracking the evolution of literary metaphors with temporal embeddings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13701v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:03:49 GMT
• Title: Metaphors' journeys across time and genre: tracking the evolution of literary metaphors with temporal embeddings
• Abstract summary: This study investigates whether the processing costs of literary metaphors varied over time and genre.<n>Overall, semantic similarity, and hence metaphor processing demands, remained stable over time.<n> genre played a key role: metaphors appeared more difficult in modern literary contexts than in 19th-century literature.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Metaphors are a distinctive feature of literary language, yet they remain less studied experimentally than everyday metaphors. Moreover, previous psycholinguistic and computational approaches overlooked the temporal dimension, although many literary metaphors were coined centuries apart from contemporary readers. This study innovatively applies tools from diachronic distributional semantics to assess whether the processing costs of literary metaphors varied over time and genre. Specifically, we trained word embeddings on literary and nonliterary Italian corpora from the 19th and 21st centuries, for a total of 124 million tokens, and modeled changes in the semantic similarity between topics and vehicles of 515 19th-century literary metaphors, taking this measure as a proxy of metaphor processing demands. Overall, semantic similarity, and hence metaphor processing demands, remained stable over time. However, genre played a key role: metaphors appeared more difficult (i.e., lower topic-vehicle similarity) in modern literary contexts than in 19th-century literature, but easier (i.e., higher topic-vehicle similarity) in today's nonliterary language (e.g., the Web) than in 19th-century nonliterary texts. This pattern was further shaped by semantic features of metaphors' individual terms, such as vector coherence and semantic neighborhood density. Collectively, these findings align with broader linguistic changes in Italian, such as the stylistic simplification of modern literature, which may have increased metaphor processing demands, and the high creativity of the Web's language, which seems to render metaphor more accessible.

Related papers

• Floating or Suggesting Ideas? A Large-Scale Contrastive Analysis of Metaphorical and Literal Verb-Object Constructions [53.690096725532726]
  We analyze 297 English verb-object pairs (e.g., float idea vs. suggest idea) in 2M corpus sentences.<n>Using five NLP tools, we extract 2,293 cognitive and linguistic features capturing affective, lexical, syntactic, and discourse-level properties.<n>Cross-pair results show literal contexts have higher lexical frequency, cohesion, and structural regularity, while metaphorical contexts show greater affective load, imageability, lexical diversity, and constructional specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T14:08:57Z)
• A Perspective on Literary Metaphor in the Context of Generative AI [0.6445605125467572]
  This study explores the role of literary metaphor and its capacity to generate a range of meanings. To investigate whether the inclusion of original figurative language improves textual quality, we trained an LSTM-based language model in Afrikaans. The paper raises thought-provoking questions on aesthetic value, interpretation and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T08:27:29Z)
• That was the last straw, we need more: Are Translation Systems Sensitive to Disambiguating Context? [64.38544995251642]
  We study semantic ambiguities that exist in the source (English in this work) itself. We focus on idioms that are open to both literal and figurative interpretations. We find that current MT models consistently translate English idioms literally, even when the context suggests a figurative interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T06:38:49Z)
• LMs stand their Ground: Investigating the Effect of Embodiment in Figurative Language Interpretation by Language Models [0.0]
  Figurative language is a challenge for language models since its interpretation deviates from their conventional order and meaning. Yet, humans can easily understand and interpret metaphors as they can be derived from embodied metaphors. This study shows how larger language models perform better at interpreting metaphoric sentences when the action of the metaphorical sentence is more embodied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T11:44:12Z)
• Metaphorical Paraphrase Generation: Feeding Metaphorical Language Models with Literal Texts [2.6397379133308214]
  The proposed algorithm does not only focus on verbs but also on nouns and adjectives. Human evaluation showed that our system-generated metaphors are considered more creative and metaphorical than human-generated ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T15:11:27Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• On the Impact of Temporal Representations on Metaphor Detection [1.6959319157216468]
  State-of-the-art approaches for metaphor detection compare their literal - or core - meaning and their contextual meaning using sequential metaphor classifiers based on neural networks. This study examines the metaphor detection task with a detailed exploratory analysis where different temporal and static word embeddings are used to account for different representations of literal meanings. Results suggest that different word embeddings do impact on the metaphor detection task and some temporal word embeddings slightly outperform static methods on some performance measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T08:43:21Z)
• It's not Rocket Science : Interpreting Figurative Language in Narratives [48.84507467131819]
  We study the interpretation of two non-compositional figurative languages (idioms and similes) Our experiments show that models based solely on pre-trained language models perform substantially worse than humans on these tasks. We additionally propose knowledge-enhanced models, adopting human strategies for interpreting figurative language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T21:46:35Z)
• MERMAID: Metaphor Generation with Symbolism and Discriminative Decoding [22.756157298168127]
  Based on a theoretically-grounded connection between metaphors and symbols, we propose a method to automatically construct a parallel corpus. For the generation task, we incorporate a metaphor discriminator to guide the decoding of a sequence to sequence model fine-tuned on our parallel data. A task-based evaluation shows that human-written poems enhanced with metaphors are preferred 68% of the time compared to poems without metaphors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T16:39:19Z)
• Lexical semantic change for Ancient Greek and Latin [61.69697586178796]
  Associating a word's correct meaning in its historical context is a central challenge in diachronic research. We build on a recent computational approach to semantic change based on a dynamic Bayesian mixture model. We provide a systematic comparison of dynamic Bayesian mixture models for semantic change with state-of-the-art embedding-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-22T12:04:08Z)
• Generating similes effortlessly like a Pro: A Style Transfer Approach for Simile Generation [65.22565071742528]
  Figurative language such as a simile go beyond plain expressions to give readers new insights and inspirations. Generating a simile requires proper understanding for effective mapping of properties between two concepts. We show how replacing literal sentences with similes from our best model in machine generated stories improves evocativeness and leads to better acceptance by human judges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T17:37:13Z)
• Metaphoric Paraphrase Generation [58.592750281138265]
  We use crowdsourcing to evaluate our results, as well as developing an automatic metric for evaluating metaphoric paraphrases. We show that while the lexical replacement baseline is capable of producing accurate paraphrases, they often lack metaphoricity. Our metaphor masking model excels in generating metaphoric sentences while performing nearly as well with regard to fluency and paraphrase quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T16:30:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.