Rethinking the Role of LLMs in Time Series Forecasting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14744v1
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:39:09 GMT
- Title: Rethinking the Role of LLMs in Time Series Forecasting
- Authors: Xin Qiu, Junlong Tong, Yirong Sun, Yunpu Ma, Wei Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have been introduced to time series forecasting (TSF) to incorporate contextual knowledge beyond numerical signals.<n>We show that such conclusions stem from limited evaluation settings and do not hold at scale.<n>Our results demonstrate that emphLLM4TS indeed improves forecasting performance, with especially large gains in cross-domain generalization.
- Score: 15.951870420397682
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been introduced to time series forecasting (TSF) to incorporate contextual knowledge beyond numerical signals. However, existing studies question whether LLMs provide genuine benefits, often reporting comparable performance without LLMs. We show that such conclusions stem from limited evaluation settings and do not hold at scale. We conduct a large-scale study of LLM-based TSF (LLM4TSF) across 8 billion observations, 17 forecasting scenarios, 4 horizons, multiple alignment strategies, and both in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Our results demonstrate that \emph{LLM4TS indeed improves forecasting performance}, with especially large gains in cross-domain generalization. Pre-alignment outperforming post-alignment in over 90\% of tasks. Both pretrained knowledge and model architecture of LLMs contribute and play complementary roles: pretraining is critical under distribution shifts, while architecture excels at modeling complex temporal dynamics. Moreover, under large-scale mixed distributions, a fully intact LLM becomes indispensable, as confirmed by token-level routing analysis and prompt-based improvements. Overall, Our findings overturn prior negative assessments, establish clear conditions under which LLMs are not only useful, and provide practical guidance for effective model design. We release our code at https://github.com/EIT-NLP/LLM4TSF.
Related papers
- Is More Context Always Better? Examining LLM Reasoning Capability for Time Interval Prediction [15.45305246863211]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in reasoning and prediction across different domains.<n>This paper presents a systematic study investigating whether LLMs can predict time intervals between recurring user actions.<n>We benchmark state-of-the-art LLMs in zero-shot settings against both statistical and machine-learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T07:18:40Z) - Selective LLM-Guided Regularization for Enhancing Recommendation Models [7.406718588794206]
We introduce a model-agnostic and efficient framework that activates LLM based pairwise ranking supervision only when a trainable gating mechanism informs by user history length, item popularity, and model uncertainty predicts the LLM to be reliable.<n> Experiments across multiple datasets show that this selective strategy consistently improves overall accuracy and yields substantial gains in cold start and long tail regimes, outperforming global distillation baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-25T06:30:00Z) - Revisiting LLMs as Zero-Shot Time-Series Forecasters: Small Noise Can Break Large Models [32.30528039193554]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across diverse tasks without domain-specific training.<n>Recent studies suggest that LLMs lack inherent effectiveness in forecasting.<n>Our experiments show that LLM-based zero-shot forecasters often struggle to achieve high accuracy due to their sensitivity to noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-31T08:24:01Z) - Test-Time Learning for Large Language Models [33.11605667376906]
We propose a Test-Time Learning (TTL) paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>LLMs dynamically adapts to target domains using only unlabeled test data during testing.<n>We demonstrate through experiments that TLM improves performance by at least 20% compared to original LLMs on domain knowledge adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T02:18:59Z) - LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.<n>LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.<n>Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z) - Understanding Forgetting in LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning and Preference Learning - A Convex Optimization Perspective [55.66517396157806]
The widely adopted approach in post-training popular open-source LLMs is to sequentially perform SFT and RLHF/DPO.<n>This is suboptimal in terms of SFT and RLHF/DPO trade-off.<n>We propose a practical joint post-training framework which has theoretical convergence guarantees and empirically outperforms sequential post-training framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-20T19:38:41Z) - VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs [66.80143024475635]
We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates.<n>Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z) - Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [68.29746557968107]
We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans.<n> Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z) - Time Series Forecasting with LLMs: Understanding and Enhancing Model Capabilities [46.02234423159257]
Large language models (LLMs) have been applied in many fields and have developed rapidly in recent years.<n>Recent works treat large language models as emphzero-shot time series reasoners without further fine-tuning.<n>Our study shows that LLMs perform well in predicting time series with clear patterns and trends, but face challenges with datasets lacking periodicity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-16T17:15:28Z) - The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context
Learning [61.68787689234622]
A recent study, LIMA, shows that using merely 1K examples for alignment tuning can achieve significant alignment performance as well.
This raises questions about how exactly the alignment tuning transforms a base LLM.
We show that the gap between tuning-free and tuning-based alignment methods can be significantly reduced through strategic prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T00:46:11Z) - FederatedScope-LLM: A Comprehensive Package for Fine-tuning Large
Language Models in Federated Learning [70.38817963253034]
This paper first discusses these challenges of federated fine-tuning LLMs, and introduces our package FS-LLM as a main contribution.
We provide comprehensive federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithm implementations and versatile programming interfaces for future extension in FL scenarios.
We conduct extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of FS-LLM and benchmark advanced LLMs with state-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithms in FL settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T09:40:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.