Safe-SDL:Establishing Safety Boundaries and Control Mechanisms for AI-Driven Self-Driving Laboratories

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15061v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 12:42:48 GMT
• Title: Safe-SDL:Establishing Safety Boundaries and Control Mechanisms for AI-Driven Self-Driving Laboratories
• Authors: Zihan Zhang, Haohui Que, Junhan Chang, Xin Zhang, Hao Wei, Tong Zhu,
• Abstract summary: Self-Driving Laboratories (SDLs) create closed-loop experimental systems capable of autonomous hypothesis generation, experimentation, and analysis.<n>This paper presents Safe-SDL, a comprehensive framework for establishing robust safety boundaries and control mechanisms.
• Score: 18.300558114535992
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of Self-Driving Laboratories (SDLs) transforms scientific discovery methodology by integrating AI with robotic automation to create closed-loop experimental systems capable of autonomous hypothesis generation, experimentation, and analysis. While promising to compress research timelines from years to weeks, their deployment introduces unprecedented safety challenges differing from traditional laboratories or purely digital AI. This paper presents Safe-SDL, a comprehensive framework for establishing robust safety boundaries and control mechanisms in AI-driven autonomous laboratories. We identify and analyze the critical ``Syntax-to-Safety Gap'' -- the disconnect between AI-generated syntactically correct commands and their physical safety implications -- as the central challenge in SDL deployment. Our framework addresses this gap through three synergistic components: (1) formally defined Operational Design Domains (ODDs) that constrain system behavior within mathematically verified boundaries, (2) Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) that provide real-time safety guarantees through continuous state-space monitoring, and (3) a novel Transactional Safety Protocol (CRUTD) that ensures atomic consistency between digital planning and physical execution. We ground our theoretical contributions through analysis of existing implementations including UniLabOS and the Osprey architecture, demonstrating how these systems instantiate key safety principles. Evaluation against the LabSafety Bench reveals that current foundation models exhibit significant safety failures, demonstrating that architectural safety mechanisms are essential rather than optional. Our framework provides both theoretical foundations and practical implementation guidance for safe deployment of autonomous scientific systems, establishing the groundwork for responsible acceleration of AI-driven discovery.

Related papers

• BarrierSteer: LLM Safety via Learning Barrier Steering [83.12893815611052]
  BarrierSteer is a novel framework that formalizes safety by embedding learned non-linear safety constraints directly into the model's latent representation space.<n>We show that BarrierSteer substantially reduces adversarial success rates, decreases unsafe generations, and outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T18:19:46Z)
• What Breaks Embodied AI Security:LLM Vulnerabilities, CPS Flaws,or Something Else? [28.12412876058788]
  Embodied AI systems are rapidly transitioning from controlled environments to safety critical real-world deployments.<n>Unlike disembodied AI, failures in embodied intelligence lead to irreversible physical consequences.<n>We argue that a significant class of failures arises from embodiment-induced system-level mismatches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T13:29:00Z)
• Assured Autonomy: How Operations Research Powers and Orchestrates Generative AI Systems [18.881800772626427]
  We argue generative models can be fragile in operational domains unless paired with mechanisms that provide feasibility, robustness to distribution shift, and stress testing.<n>We develop a conceptual framework for assured autonomy grounded in operations research.<n>These elements define a research agenda for assured autonomy in safety-critical, reliability-sensitive operational domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T04:24:06Z)
• Safe-ROS: An Architecture for Autonomous Robots in Safety-Critical Domains [1.491109220586182]
  We contribute the Safe-ROS architecture for developing reliable and verifiable autonomous robots in safety-critical domains.<n>We demonstrate Safe-ROS on an AgileX Scout Mini robot performing autonomous inspection in a nuclear environment.<n>Our results demonstrate that the Safe-ROS architecture can provide safety verifiable oversight while deploying autonomous robots in safety-critical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T12:34:33Z)
• ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots [48.89876809734855]
  We present the first systematic study of adversarial safety attacks on embodied AI systems.<n>We show attack success rates exceeding 50% across all safety categories.<n>Results expose a previously underexplored but highly consequential attack surface in embodied AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T15:00:28Z)
• Report on NSF Workshop on Science of Safe AI [75.96202715567088]
  New advances in machine learning are leading to new opportunities to develop technology-based solutions to societal problems.<n>To fulfill the promise of AI, we must address how to develop AI-based systems that are accurate and performant but also safe and trustworthy.<n>This report is the result of the discussions in the working groups that addressed different aspects of safety at the workshop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T18:55:29Z)
• Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems [79.31011047593492]
  Embodied AI systems are increasingly prevalent across various applications.<n> Ensuring their safety in complex operating environments remains a major challenge.<n>This Perspective offers a pathway toward safer, large-scale adoption of embodied AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T15:46:25Z)
• Designing Control Barrier Function via Probabilistic Enumeration for Safe Reinforcement Learning Navigation [55.02966123945644]
  We propose a hierarchical control framework leveraging neural network verification techniques to design control barrier functions (CBFs) and policy correction mechanisms.<n>Our approach relies on probabilistic enumeration to identify unsafe regions of operation, which are then used to construct a safe CBF-based control layer.<n>These experiments demonstrate the ability of the proposed solution to correct unsafe actions while preserving efficient navigation behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T13:47:25Z)
• CEE: An Inference-Time Jailbreak Defense for Embodied Intelligence via Subspace Concept Rotation [23.07221882519171]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly becoming the cognitive core of Embodied Intelligence (EI) systems.<n>We propose a novel and efficient inference-time defense framework: Concept Enhancement Engineering (CEE)<n>CEE enhances the model's inherent safety mechanisms by directly manipulating its internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T03:50:04Z)
• Safe LLM-Controlled Robots with Formal Guarantees via Reachability Analysis [0.6749750044497732]
  This paper introduces a safety assurance framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)-controlled robots based on data-driven reachability analysis.<n>Our approach provides rigorous safety guarantees against unsafe behaviors without relying on explicit analytical models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T21:23:15Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
  We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Real-Time Reachability for the Safety Assurance of Autonomous Vehicles [7.1169864450668845]
  We propose using a real-time reachability algorithm for the implementation of the simplex architecture to assure the safety of a 1/10 scale open source autonomous vehicle platform. In our approach, the need to analyze an underlying controller is abstracted away, instead focusing on the effects of the controller's decisions on the system's future states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T11:12:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.