Who Is Doing the Thinking? AI as a Dynamic Cognitive Partner: A Learner-Informed Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15638v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 15:07:06 GMT
• Title: Who Is Doing the Thinking? AI as a Dynamic Cognitive Partner: A Learner-Informed Framework
• Abstract summary: This study proposes a framework positioning AI as a dynamic cognitive partner whose function shifts across learning situations.<n>We identified nine interrelated dimensions through which learners described AI as partnering with their cognition.<n>Students distinguished between productive support that extends understanding and unproductive reliance that replaces cognitive effort, indicating situational awareness of when AI should and should not be used.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in education, yet there remains a need to explain how students conceptualize AI's role in their thinking and learning. This study proposes a framework positioning AI as a dynamic cognitive partner whose function shifts across learning situations. Using qualitative analysis of written responses from 133 secondary students in Hong Kong following completion of an AI literacy course, we identified nine interrelated dimensions through which learners described AI as partnering with their cognition: conceptual scaffolding for difficult ideas; feedback and error detection; idea stimulation; cognitive organization; adaptive tutoring support; metacognitive monitoring support; task and cognitive load regulation; learning continuity beyond classroom boundaries; and explanation reframing through representational flexibility during moments of being stuck or overwhelmed. Across these dimensions, students distinguished between productive support that extends understanding and unproductive reliance that replaces cognitive effort, indicating situational awareness of when AI should and should not be used. Grounded in sociocultural theory, distributed cognition, self-regulated learning, and cognitive load perspectives, the framework clarifies how AI becomes integrated into learners' cognitive activity while illuminating the boundary between cognitive extension and substitution.

Related papers

• Informal Learning Emerges in Everyday Human-LLM Interaction [74.53081471113929]
  We show that everyday human-LLM interaction contains measurable, selective and conditionally organized behavioural signatures of informal learning.<n>They shift AI evaluation from answer-delivery efficiency toward the preservation of cognitive opportunities for users to reason, test ideas and construct understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T07:56:41Z)
• The Pedagogy of AI Mistakes: Fostering Higher-Order Thinking [26.81026121718816]
  We argue that instructors can engage students in the fundamental processes of higher-order thinking by framing AI as a learning companion''<n>We examine how structured interaction with AI-generated errors supports metacognitive engagement, reinforces disciplinary rigor, and relates to students' perceived AI literacy and subject-matter competency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T21:50:46Z)
• Students Know AI Should Not Replace Thinking, but How Do They Regulate It? The TACO Framework for Human-AI Cognitive Partnership [0.8122270502556375]
  This study examines how learners perceive their management of the boundary between assistance and outsourcing in practice.<n>By shifting attention from ethical awareness to cognitive regulation, the study contributes a learner-grounded approach to sustaining AI as a dynamic cognitive partner in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T18:43:18Z)
• Perceived Importance of Cognitive Skills Among Computing Students in the Era of AI [2.0391237204597363]
  The availability and increasing integration of generative AI tools have transformed computing education.<n>While AI in education presents opportunities, it also raises new concerns about how these powerful know-it-all AI tools, which are becoming widespread, impact cognitive skill development among students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T17:05:26Z)
• Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignment [17.265229093607676]
  We argue that disrupting cognitive passivity requires more dynamic and adaptive strategy through cognitive alignment.<n>In the framework, we provide the mapping between AI's interaction mode (transmissive or deliberative) and users' cognitive demand (receptive or deliberative)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T06:47:55Z)
• Why AI systems don't learn and what to do about it: Lessons on autonomous learning from cognitive science [79.50667364149979]
  We critically examine the limitations of current AI models in achieving autonomous learning and propose a learning architecture inspired by human and animal cognition.<n>The proposed framework integrates learning from observation (System A) and learning from active behavior (System B) while switching flexibly between these learning modes as a function of internally generated meta-control signals (System M).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T14:54:56Z)
• From Individual Prompts to Collective Intelligence: Mainstreaming Generative AI in the Classroom [2.7886031629181987]
  We argue for a shift toward collective intelligence (CI)-focused pedagogy, where GenAI acts as a catalyst for peer-to-peer learning.<n>We implement Generative CI activities in two undergraduate engineering courses, engaging 140 students through thinking routines.<n>Results demonstrate that students value the combination of human collaboration with strategic AI support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T08:28:20Z)
• Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
  Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z)
• ChatGPT produces more "lazy" thinkers: Evidence of cognitive engagement decline [0.0]
  This study investigates the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools on the cognitive engagement of students during academic writing tasks.<n>The results revealed significantly lower cognitive engagement scores in the ChatGPT group compared to the control group.<n>These findings suggest that AI assistance may lead to cognitive offloading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T18:41:50Z)
• Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning [59.60803539959191]
  Self-improving agents aim to continuously acquire new capabilities with minimal supervision.<n>Current approaches face two key limitations: their self-improvement processes are often rigid, fail to generalize across tasks domains, and struggle to scale with increasing agent capabilities.<n>We argue that effective self-improvement requires intrinsic metacognitive learning, defined as an agent's intrinsic ability to actively evaluate, reflect on, and adapt its own learning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:53:35Z)
• Distinguishing Fact from Fiction: Student Traits, Attitudes, and AI Hallucination Detection in Business School Assessment [2.3359837623080613]
  We examine how academic skills, cognitive traits, and AI scepticism influence students' ability to detect factually incorrect AI-generated responses (hallucinations) in a high-stakes assessment at a UK business school.<n>We find that only 20% successfully identified the hallucination, with strong academic performance, interpretive skills thinking, writing proficiency, and AI scepticism emerging as key predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T18:39:57Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education.<n>We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• World Models in Artificial Intelligence: Sensing, Learning, and Reasoning Like a Child [10.183372891207966]
  World Models help Artificial Intelligence (AI) predict outcomes, reason about its environment, and guide decision-making.<n>We highlight six key research areas -- physics-informed learning, neurosymbolic learning, continual learning, causal inference, human-in-the-loop AI, and responsible AI -- as essential for enabling true reasoning in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T12:50:40Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Vision for Hybrid Intelligence [0.45207442500313766]
  I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualisation of AI as tools, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI. I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. The paper presents three unique conceptualisations of AI: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human mental models, and the extension of human cognition via tightly coupled human-AI hybrid intelligence systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T10:07:46Z)
• From Psychological Curiosity to Artificial Curiosity: Curiosity-Driven Learning in Artificial Intelligence Tasks [56.20123080771364]
  Psychological curiosity plays a significant role in human intelligence to enhance learning through exploration and information acquisition. In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community, artificial curiosity provides a natural intrinsic motivation for efficient learning. CDL has become increasingly popular, where agents are self-motivated to learn novel knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.