Local Node Differential Privacy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15802v1
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 18:41:48 GMT
- Title: Local Node Differential Privacy
- Authors: Sofya Raskhodnikova, Adam Smith, Connor Wagaman, Anatoly Zavyalov,
- Abstract summary: We investigate node differential privacy for graphs in the local model of private data analysis.<n>In our model, dubbed LNDP, each node sees its own edge list and releases the output of a local randomizer on this input.<n>We develop a novel algorithmic framework for this setting that allows us to accurately answer arbitrary linear queries.
- Score: 6.7576664180067105
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We initiate an investigation of node differential privacy for graphs in the local model of private data analysis. In our model, dubbed LNDP, each node sees its own edge list and releases the output of a local randomizer on this input. These outputs are aggregated by an untrusted server to obtain a final output. We develop a novel algorithmic framework for this setting that allows us to accurately answer arbitrary linear queries on a blurry approximation of the input graph's degree distribution. For some natural problems, the resulting algorithms match the accuracy achievable with node privacy in the central model, where data are held and processed by a trusted server. We also prove lower bounds on the error required by LNDP that imply the optimality of our algorithms for several fundamental graph statistics. We then lift these lower bounds to the interactive LNDP setting, demonstrating the optimality of our algorithms even when constantly many rounds of interaction are permitted. Obtaining our lower bounds requires new approaches, since those developed for the usual local model do not apply to the inherently overlapping inputs that arise from graphs. Finally, we prove structural results that reveal qualitative differences between local node privacy and the standard local model for tabular data.
Related papers
- Benchmarking Fraud Detectors on Private Graph Data [70.4654745317714]
Currently, many types of fraud are managed in part by automated detection algorithms that operate over graphs.<n>We consider the scenario where a data holder wishes to outsource development of fraud detectors to third parties.<n>Third parties submit their fraud detectors to the data holder, who evaluates these algorithms on a private dataset and then publicly communicates the results.<n>We propose a realistic privacy attack on this system that allows an adversary to de-anonymize individuals' data based only on the evaluation results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T03:20:15Z) - Practical and Accurate Local Edge Differentially Private Graph Algorithms [11.49857418691547]
We introduce novel LDP algorithms for two fundamental graph statistics: k-core decomposition and triangle counting.<n>Our approach leverages input-dependent private graph properties, specifically the degeneracy and maximum degree of the graph, to improve theoretical utility.<n>Our k-core decomposition achieves errors within 3x of exact values, far outperforming the 131x error in the baseline of Dhulipala et al.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T20:54:07Z) - Sublinear Space Graph Algorithms in the Continual Release Model [48.65946341463292]
We make novel use of sparsification techniques from the non-private streaming and static algorithms literature to achieve new results in the sublinear space, continual release setting.<n>This includes algorithms for densest subgraph, maximum matching, and the first continual release $k$-core decomposition algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T20:15:07Z) - Deep Manifold Graph Auto-Encoder for Attributed Graph Embedding [51.75091298017941]
This paper proposes a novel Deep Manifold (Variational) Graph Auto-Encoder (DMVGAE/DMGAE) for attributed graph data.
The proposed method surpasses state-of-the-art baseline algorithms by a significant margin on different downstream tasks across popular datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T17:57:07Z) - Reinforcement Learning for Node Selection in Branch-and-Bound [52.2648997215667]
Current state-of-the-art selectors utilize either hand-crafted ensembles that automatically switch between naive sub-node selectors, or learned node selectors that rely on individual node data.
We propose a novel simulation technique that uses reinforcement learning (RL) while considering the entire tree state, rather than just isolated nodes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T19:55:56Z) - Graph Learning Across Data Silos [10.448384704100684]
We consider the problem of inferring graph topology from smooth graph signals in a novel but practical scenario.<n>Data are located in distributed clients and prohibited from leaving local clients due to factors such as privacy concerns.<n>We propose an auto-weighted multiple graph learning model to jointly learn a personalized graph for each local client and a single consensus graph for all clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-17T02:14:57Z) - Muffliato: Peer-to-Peer Privacy Amplification for Decentralized Optimization and Averaging [20.39986955578245]
We introduce pairwise network differential privacy, a relaxation of Local Differential Privacy (LDP)
We derive a differentially private decentralized optimization algorithm that alternates between local gradient descent steps and gossip averaging.
Our results show that our algorithms amplify privacy guarantees as a function of the distance between nodes in the graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-10T13:32:35Z) - Walk for Learning: A Random Walk Approach for Federated Learning from
Heterogeneous Data [17.978941229970886]
We focus on Federated Learning (FL) as a canonical application.
One of the main challenges of FL is the communication bottleneck between the nodes and the parameter server.
We present an adaptive random walk learning algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-01T19:53:24Z) - Optimal Propagation for Graph Neural Networks [51.08426265813481]
We propose a bi-level optimization approach for learning the optimal graph structure.
We also explore a low-rank approximation model for further reducing the time complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-06T03:37:00Z) - GAP: Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Aggregation
Perturbation [19.247325210343035]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful models designed for graph data that learn node representation.
Recent studies have shown that GNNs can raise significant privacy concerns when graph data contain sensitive information.
We propose GAP, a novel differentially private GNN that safeguards privacy of nodes and edges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-02T08:58:07Z) - Scaling Structured Inference with Randomization [64.18063627155128]
We propose a family of dynamic programming (RDP) randomized for scaling structured models to tens of thousands of latent states.
Our method is widely applicable to classical DP-based inference.
It is also compatible with automatic differentiation so can be integrated with neural networks seamlessly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-07T11:26:41Z) - Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks [14.917945355629563]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular technique for modelling graph-structured data.
This work formally defines the problem of learning 1-layer GNNs with node-level privacy.
We provide an algorithmic solution with a strong differential privacy guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-23T16:18:53Z) - Private Weighted Random Walk Stochastic Gradient Descent [21.23973736418492]
We consider a decentralized learning setting in which data is distributed over nodes in a graph.
We propose two algorithms based on two types of random walks that achieve, in a decentralized way, uniform sampling and importance sampling of the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-03T16:52:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.