Decoding the Human Factor: High Fidelity Behavioral Prediction for Strategic Foresight

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17222v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:13:17 GMT
• Title: Decoding the Human Factor: High Fidelity Behavioral Prediction for Strategic Foresight
• Authors: Ben Yellin, Ehud Ezra, Mark Foreman, Shula Grinapol,
• Abstract summary: Large Behavioral Model is a behavioral foundation model fine-tuned to predict individual strategic choices with high fidelity.<n>We trained on a proprietary dataset linking stable dispositions, motivational states, and situational constraints to observed choices.<n>We find that while prompting-based baselines exhibit a complexity ceiling, LBM continues to benefit from increasingly dense trait profiles.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Predicting human decision-making in high-stakes environments remains a central challenge for artificial intelligence. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong general reasoning, they often struggle to generate consistent, individual-specific behavior, particularly when accurate prediction depends on complex interactions between psychological traits and situational constraints. Prompting-based approaches can be brittle in this setting, exhibiting identity drift and limited ability to leverage increasingly detailed persona descriptions. To address these limitations, we introduce the Large Behavioral Model (LBM), a behavioral foundation model fine-tuned to predict individual strategic choices with high fidelity. LBM shifts from transient persona prompting to behavioral embedding by conditioning on a structured, high-dimensional trait profile derived from a comprehensive psychometric battery. Trained on a proprietary dataset linking stable dispositions, motivational states, and situational constraints to observed choices, LBM learns to map rich psychological profiles to discrete actions across diverse strategic dilemmas. In a held-out scenario evaluation, LBM fine-tuning improves behavioral prediction relative to the unadapted Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct backbone and performs comparably to frontier baselines when conditioned on Big Five traits. Moreover, we find that while prompting-based baselines exhibit a complexity ceiling, LBM continues to benefit from increasingly dense trait profiles, with performance improving as additional trait dimensions are provided. Together, these results establish LBM as a scalable approach for high-fidelity behavioral simulation, enabling applications in strategic foresight, negotiation analysis, cognitive security, and decision support.

Related papers

• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• Causal Reinforcement Learning based Agent-Patient Interaction with Clinical Domain Knowledge [3.2434118923825483]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces significant challenges in adaptive healthcare interventions, such as dementia care, where data is scarce.<n>We present a novel framework called Causal structure-aware Reinforcement Learning (CRL) that explicitly integrates causal discovery and reasoning into policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T22:38:03Z)
• DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios [57.327907850766785]
  characterization of deception across realistic real-world scenarios remains underexplored.<n>We establish DeceptionBench, the first benchmark that systematically evaluates how deceptive tendencies manifest across different domains.<n>On the intrinsic dimension, we explore whether models exhibit self-interested egoistic tendencies or sycophantic behaviors that prioritize user appeasement.<n>We incorporate sustained multi-turn interaction loops to construct a more realistic simulation of real-world feedback dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T10:14:26Z)
• DPRF: A Generalizable Dynamic Persona Refinement Framework for Optimizing Behavior Alignment Between Personalized LLM Role-Playing Agents and Humans [28.038221167188013]
  Large language model role-playing agents (LLM RPAs) aim to simulate individual human behaviors.<n>The Dynamic Persona Refinement Framework (DPRF) aims to optimize the alignment of LLM RPAs' behaviors with those of target individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T01:26:38Z)
• Personality as a Probe for LLM Evaluation: Method Trade-offs and Downstream Effects [0.6087817758152709]
  We present a systematic study of personality control using the Big Five traits.<n>Trait-level analysis shows openness as uniquely challenging, agreeableness as most resistant to ICL.<n>Experiments on Gemma-2-2B-IT and LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct reveal clear trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T04:19:15Z)
• The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs [60.15472325639723]
  Personality traits have long been studied as predictors of human behavior.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest similar patterns may emerge in artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T21:27:10Z)
• IROTE: Human-like Traits Elicitation of Large Language Model via In-Context Self-Reflective Optimization [66.6349183886101]
  We propose IROTE, a novel in-context method for stable and transferable trait elicitation.<n>We show that one single IROTE-generated self-reflection can induce LLMs' stable impersonation of the target trait across diverse downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T08:04:28Z)
• Persistent Instability in LLM's Personality Measurements: Effects of Scale, Reasoning, and Conversation History [7.58175460763641]
  Even 400B+ models exhibit substantial response variability.<n> Interventions expected to stabilize behavior, such as chain-of-thought reasoning, detailed personas instruction, inclusion of conversation history, can paradoxically increase variability.<n>For safety-critical applications requiring predictable behavior, these findings indicate that personality-based alignment strategies may be fundamentally inadequate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T19:11:33Z)
• Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective [55.2480439325792]
  We frame this problem in a causal paradigm, providing the rich toolbox of causality to identify persistent challenges.<n>Inheriting from the literature of causal inference, we identify key assumptions necessary for reliable generalisation.<n>We illustrate failure modes of naive reward models and demonstrate how causally-inspired approaches can improve model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:45:42Z)
• Where You Go is Who You Are: Behavioral Theory-Guided LLMs for Inverse Reinforcement Learning [4.345382237366071]
  This study introduces SILIC, short for Sociodemographic Inference with LLM-guided Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Cognitive Chain Reasoning ( CCR)<n> CCR infers sociodemographic attributes from observed mobility patterns by capturing latent behavioral intentions and reasoning through psychological constructs.<n>Our method substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and shows great promise for enriching big trajectory data to support behaviorally grounded applications in transportation planning and beyond.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T19:56:03Z)
• Wait, that's not an option: LLMs Robustness with Incorrect Multiple-Choice Options [2.1184929769291294]
  This work introduces a novel framework for evaluating LLMs' capacity to balance instruction-following with critical reasoning.<n>We show that post-training aligned models often default to selecting invalid options, while base models exhibit improved refusal capabilities that scale with model size.<n>We additionally conduct a parallel human study showing similar instruction-following biases, with implications for how these biases may propagate through human feedback datasets used in alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T19:27:43Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.