A Privacy by Design Framework for Large Language Model-Based Applications for Children

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17418v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:50:52 GMT
• Title: A Privacy by Design Framework for Large Language Model-Based Applications for Children
• Authors: Diana Addae, Diana Rogachova, Nafiseh Kahani, Masoud Barati, Michael Christensen, Chen Zhou,
• Abstract summary: Children are increasingly using technologies powered by AI.<n>There are growing concerns about privacy risks particularly for children.<n>This article proposes a framework based on the Privacy-Design (PbD) approach.
• Score: 1.3146378832730206
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Children are increasingly using technologies powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, there are growing concerns about privacy risks, particularly for children. Although existing privacy regulations require companies and organizations to implement protections, doing so can be challenging in practice. To address this challenge, this article proposes a framework based on Privacy-by-Design (PbD), which guides designers and developers to take on a proactive and risk-averse approach to technology design. Our framework includes principles from several privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) from the European Union, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) from Canada, and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) from the United States. We map these principles to various stages of applications that use Large Language Models (LLMs), including data collection, model training, operational monitoring, and ongoing validation. For each stage, we discuss the operational controls found in the recent academic literature to help AI service providers and developers reduce privacy risks while meeting legal standards. In addition, the framework includes design guidelines for children, drawing from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the UK's Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC), and recent academic research. To demonstrate how this framework can be applied in practice, we present a case study of an LLM-based educational tutor for children under 13. Through our analysis and the case study, we show that by using data protection strategies such as technical and organizational controls and making age-appropriate design decisions throughout the LLM life cycle, we can support the development of AI applications for children that provide privacy protections and comply with legal requirements.

Related papers

• Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agents [84.30907378390512]
  LLM agents increasingly act on users' personal information, yet existing privacy defenses remain limited in both design and adaptability.<n>We propose Contextualized Defense Instructing (CDI), a new privacy defense paradigm.<n>We show that our CDI consistently achieves a better balance between privacy preservation (94.2%) and helpfulness (80.6%) than baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T13:35:33Z)
• Toward Youth-Centered Privacy-by-Design in Smart Devices: A Systematic Review [0.0]
  This literature review evaluates privacy-by-design frameworks, tools, and policies intended to protect youth in AI-enabled smart devices.<n>Findings reveal that while technical interventions such as on-device processing, federated learning, and lightweight encryption significantly reduce data exposure, their adoption remains limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T21:17:53Z)
• Bridging the Mobile Trust Gap: A Zero Trust Framework for Consumer-Facing Applications [51.56484100374058]
  This paper proposes an extended Zero Trust model designed for mobile applications operating in untrusted, user-controlled environments.<n>Using a design science methodology, the study introduced a six-pillar framework that supports runtime enforcement of trust.<n>The proposed model offers a practical and standards-aligned approach to securing mobile applications beyond pre-deployment controls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T18:42:36Z)
• Ethical AI for Young Digital Citizens: A Call to Action on Privacy Governance [0.0]
  The rapid expansion of Artificial Intelligence in digital platforms used by youth has created significant challenges related to privacy, autonomy, and data protection.<n>While AI-driven personalization offers enhanced user experiences, it often operates without clear ethical boundaries, leaving young users vulnerable to data exploitation and algorithmic biases.<n>This paper presents a call to action for ethical AI governance, advocating for a structured framework that ensures youth-centred privacy protections, transparent data practices, and regulatory oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T01:35:56Z)
• How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Review [15.15468770348023]
  We evaluate large language models' performance in privacy-related tasks such as privacy information extraction (PIE), legal and regulatory key point detection (KPD), and question answering (QA)<n>Through an empirical assessment, we investigate the capacity of several prominent LLMs, including BERT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and custom models, in executing privacy compliance checks and technical privacy reviews.<n>While LLMs show promise in automating privacy reviews and identifying regulatory discrepancies, significant gaps persist in their ability to fully comply with evolving legal standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T01:51:37Z)
• Towards an Enforceable GDPR Specification [49.1574468325115]
  Privacy by Design (PbD) is prescribed by modern privacy regulations such as the EU's. One emerging technique to realize PbD is enforcement (RE) We present a set of requirements and an iterative methodology for creating formal specifications of legal provisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:38:51Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Security for Children in the Digital Society -- A Rights-based and Research Ethics Approach [0.0]
  The project is situated in a German context with a focus on European frameworks for the development of Artificial Intelligence and the protection of children from security risks arising in the course of algorithm-mediated online communication. The project develops a children's rights approach to questions of security for children online while also developing a research ethics approach for conducting research with children on online harms such as cybergrooming and sexual violence against children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T08:13:02Z)
• On the conformance of Android applications with children's data protection regulations and safeguarding guidelines [3.8029070240258687]
  Even apps designed for children do not always comply with legislation or guidance. This lack of compliance could contribute creating a path to causing physical or mental harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T09:46:56Z)
• Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment [100.1798289103163]
  We present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP) Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier" This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T05:29:18Z)
• PLUE: Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark for Privacy Policies in English [77.79102359580702]
  We introduce the Privacy Policy Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, a multi-task benchmark for evaluating the privacy policy language understanding. We also collect a large corpus of privacy policies to enable privacy policy domain-specific language model pre-training. We demonstrate that domain-specific continual pre-training offers performance improvements across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T05:58:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.