AI Hallucination from Students' Perspective: A Thematic Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17671v1
• Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 02:38:43 GMT
• Title: AI Hallucination from Students' Perspective: A Thematic Analysis
• Authors: Abdulhadi Shoufan, Ahmad-Azmi-Abdelhamid Esmaeil,
• Abstract summary: hallucinations pose a growing threat to learning as students increasingly rely on large language models.<n>This study explores how students experience hallucinations, their detection strategies, and their mental models of why hallucinations occur.<n>Findings illuminate vulnerabilities in AI-supported learning and highlight the need for explicit instruction in verification protocols.
• Score: 0.6553031877558699
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As students increasingly rely on large language models, hallucinations pose a growing threat to learning. To mitigate this, AI literacy must expand beyond prompt engineering to address how students should detect and respond to LLM hallucinations. To support this, we need to understand how students experience hallucinations, how they detect them, and why they believe they occur. To investigate these questions, we asked university students three open-ended questions about their experiences with AI hallucinations, their detection strategies, and their mental models of why hallucinations occur. Sixty-three students responded to the survey. Thematic analysis of their responses revealed that reported hallucination issues primarily relate to incorrect or fabricated citations, false information, overconfident but misleading responses, poor adherence to prompts, persistence in incorrect answers, and sycophancy. To detect hallucinations, students rely either on intuitive judgment or on active verification strategies, such as cross-checking with external sources or re-prompting the model. Students' explanations for why hallucinations occur reflected several mental models, including notable misconceptions. Many described AI as a research engine that fabricates information when it cannot locate an answer in its "database." Others attributed hallucinations to issues with training data, inadequate prompting, or the model's inability to understand or verify information. These findings illuminate vulnerabilities in AI-supported learning and highlight the need for explicit instruction in verification protocols, accurate mental models of generative AI, and awareness of behaviors such as sycophancy and confident delivery that obscure inaccuracy. The study contributes empirical evidence for integrating hallucination awareness and mitigation into AI literacy curricula.

Related papers

• Understanding New-Knowledge-Induced Factual Hallucinations in LLMs: Analysis, Solution, and Interpretation [41.83870063693278]
  Previous studies show that introducing new knowledge during large language models (LLMs) fine-tuning can lead to the generation of erroneous output when tested on known information.<n>We conduct a fine-grained analysis across multiple knowledge types and two task types, including knowledge question answering (QA) and knowledge reasoning tasks.<n>We find that when fine-tuned on a dataset in which a specific knowledge type consists entirely of new knowledge, LLMs exhibit significantly increased hallucinations tendencies.<n>We propose KnownPatch, which patches a small number of known knowledge samples in the later stages of training, effectively alleviating new-knowledge-induced hallucinations
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T14:55:24Z)
• Review of Hallucination Understanding in Large Language and Vision Models [65.29139004945712]
  We present a framework for characterizing both image and text hallucinations across diverse applications.<n>Our investigations reveal that hallucinations often stem from predictable patterns in data distributions and inherited biases.<n>This survey provides a foundation for developing more robust and effective solutions to hallucinations in real-world generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T09:23:08Z)
• Investigating VLM Hallucination from a Cognitive Psychology Perspective: A First Step Toward Interpretation with Intriguing Observations [60.63340688538124]
  Hallucination is a long-standing problem that has been actively investigated in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Existing research commonly attributes hallucinations to technical limitations or sycophancy bias, where the latter means the models tend to generate incorrect answers to align with user expectations.<n>In this work, we introduce a psychological taxonomy, categorizing VLMs' cognitive biases that lead to hallucinations, including sycophancy, logical inconsistency, and a newly identified VLMs behaviour: appeal to authority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T19:03:16Z)
• Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the Answer [51.7407540261676]
  We investigate a distinct type of hallucination, where a model can consistently answer a question correctly, but a seemingly trivial perturbation causes it to produce a hallucinated response with high certainty.<n>This phenomenon is particularly concerning in high-stakes domains such as medicine or law, where model certainty is often used as a proxy for reliability.<n>We show that CHOKE examples are consistent across prompts, occur in different models and datasets, and are fundamentally distinct from other hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:46:31Z)
• Who Brings the Frisbee: Probing Hidden Hallucination Factors in Large Vision-Language Model via Causality Analysis [14.033320167387194]
  A major challenge in their real-world application is hallucination, where LVLMs generate non-existent visual elements, eroding user trust.<n>We hypothesize that hidden factors, such as objects, contexts, and semantic foreground-background structures, induce hallucination.<n>By analyzing the causality between images, text prompts, and network saliency, we systematically explore interventions to block these factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T01:23:57Z)
• Visual Description Grounding Reduces Hallucinations and Boosts Reasoning in LVLMs [52.497823009176074]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often produce responses that misalign with factual information, a phenomenon known as hallucinations.<n>We introduce Visual Description Grounded Decoding (VDGD), a training-free method designed to enhance visual perception and improve reasoning capabilities in LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T16:21:59Z)
• Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations [9.740345290187307]
  This research aims to understand the human perception of hallucinations by systematically varying the degree of hallucination. We observed that warning improved the detection of hallucination without significantly affecting the perceived truthfulness of genuine content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T18:34:32Z)
• A Cause-Effect Look at Alleviating Hallucination of Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation [51.53917938874146]
  We propose a possible solution for alleviating the hallucination in KGD by exploiting the dialogue-knowledge interaction. Experimental results of our example implementation show that this method can reduce hallucination without disrupting other dialogue performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T14:45:26Z)
• On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts [74.96789694959894]
  Large language models are successful in answering factoid questions but are also prone to hallucination. We investigate the phenomenon of LLMs possessing correct answer knowledge yet still hallucinating from the perspective of inference dynamics. Our study shed light on understanding the reasons for LLMs' hallucinations on their known facts, and more importantly, on accurately predicting when they are hallucinating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T06:48:30Z)
• Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Model Non-Factual Hallucinations [42.46721214112836]
  State-of-the-art language models (LMs) sometimes generate non-factual hallucinations that misalign with world knowledge. We create diagnostic datasets with subject-relation queries and adapt interpretability methods to trace hallucinations through internal model representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T00:23:03Z)
• Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection [63.2543947174318]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for generative and knowledge-intensive tasks including question-answering (QA) tasks. This paper analyses the phenomenon of hallucination in medical generative QA systems using widely adopted LLMs and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T03:05:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.