Market Games for Generative Models: Equilibria, Welfare, and Strategic Entry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17787v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:44:53 GMT
• Title: Market Games for Generative Models: Equilibria, Welfare, and Strategic Entry
• Abstract summary: We formalize a three-layer model-platform-user market game.<n>We show that market structure depends on models' global average performance.<n>We show that expanding the model pool does not necessarily increase user welfare or market diversity.
• Score: 13.232077127553218
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative model ecosystems increasingly operate as competitive multi-platform markets, where platforms strategically select models from a shared pool and users with heterogeneous preferences choose among them. Understanding how platforms interact, when market equilibria exist, how outcomes are shaped by model-providers, platforms, and user behavior, and how social welfare is affected is critical for fostering a beneficial market environment. In this paper, we formalize a three-layer model-platform-user market game and identify conditions for the existence of pure Nash equilibrium. Our analysis shows that market structure, whether platforms converge on similar models or differentiate by selecting distinct ones, depends not only on models' global average performance but also on their localized attraction to user groups. We further examine welfare outcomes and show that expanding the model pool does not necessarily increase user welfare or market diversity. Finally, we design novel best-response training schemes that allow model providers to strategically introduce new models into competitive markets.

Related papers

• Evaluation of Agents under Simulated AI Marketplace Dynamics [72.02953516461965]
  We introduce a simulation-based paradigm that evaluates information access systems as participants in a competitive marketplace.<n>We formalize the framework and outline a research agenda, motivated by business and economics, around marketplace simulation, metrics, optimization, and adoption in evaluation campaigns like TREC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T15:01:36Z)
• Impacts of Aggregation on Model Diversity and Consumer Utility [8.367827809551459]
  We study two types of model changes: market entry and model replacement.<n>We show that winrate can incentivize model creators to homogenize for both types of model changes.<n>We propose a new mechanism, weighted winrate, which rewards models for answers that are higher quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T18:04:03Z)
• Visual Model Selection using Feature Importance Clusters in Fairness-Performance Similarity Optimized Space [1.8682641481190012]
  We propose an interactive framework that assists in navigating and interpreting the trade-offs across a portfolio of models.<n>Our approach leverages weakly supervised metric learning to learn a Mahalanobis distance that reflects similarity in fairness and performance outcomes.<n>We then apply clustering technique (k-means) to group models based on their transformed representations of feature importances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T08:18:41Z)
• Markets for Models [0.0]
  We study markets in which firms sell models to a consumer to help improve their prediction.<n>We show firms can choose inefficiently biased models or inefficiently costly models to deter entry by competitors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T19:07:02Z)
• Exploring Model Kinship for Merging Large Language Models [73.98345036483299]
  We study model evolution through iterative merging, drawing an analogy to biological evolution.<n>We show that model kinship is closely linked to the performance improvements achieved by merging.<n>We propose a new model merging strategy: Top-k Greedy Merging with Model Kinship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T14:29:29Z)
• An Auction-based Marketplace for Model Trading in Federated Learning [54.79736037670377]
  Federated learning (FL) is increasingly recognized for its efficacy in training models using locally distributed data. We frame FL as a marketplace of models, where clients act as both buyers and sellers. We propose an auction-based solution to ensure proper pricing based on performance gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T07:25:53Z)
• Improved Bayes Risk Can Yield Reduced Social Welfare Under Competition [99.7047087527422]
  In this work, we demonstrate that competition can fundamentally alter the behavior of machine learning scaling trends. We find many settings where improving data representation quality decreases the overall predictive accuracy across users. At a conceptual level, our work suggests that favorable scaling trends for individual model-providers need not translate to downstream improvements in social welfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:06:34Z)
• Competition, Alignment, and Equilibria in Digital Marketplaces [97.03797129675951]
  We study a duopoly market where platform actions are bandit algorithms and the two platforms compete for user participation. Our main finding is that competition in this market does not perfectly align market outcomes with user utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T17:43:58Z)
• Consistency-based Merging of Variability Models [62.997667081978825]
  We introduce an approach to variability model integration that is based on the concepts of contextual modeling and conflict detection. We present the underlying concepts and the results of a corresponding performance analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T16:28:42Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.