INSURE-Dial: A Phase-Aware Conversational Dataset & Benchmark for Compliance Verification and Phase Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18448v2
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 07:16:00 GMT
• Title: INSURE-Dial: A Phase-Aware Conversational Dataset & Benchmark for Compliance Verification and Phase Detection
• Abstract summary: Administrative phone tasks drain roughly 1 trillion USD annually from U.S. healthcare.<n>We introduce INSURE-Dial, the first public benchmark for developing and assessing compliance-aware voice agents.
• Score: 40.157413213893165
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Administrative phone tasks drain roughly 1 trillion USD annually from U.S. healthcare, with over 500 million insurance-benefit verification calls manually handled in 2024. We introduce INSURE-Dial, to our knowledge the first public benchmark for developing and assessing compliance-aware voice agents for phase-aware call auditing with span-based compliance verification. The corpus includes 50 de-identified, AI-initiated calls with live insurance representatives (mean 71 turns/call) and 1,000 synthetically generated calls that mirror the same workflow. All calls are annotated with a phase-structured JSON schema covering IVR navigation, patient identification, coverage status, medication checks (up to two drugs), and agent identification (CRN), and each phase is labeled for Information and Procedural compliance under explicit ask/answer logic. We define two novel evaluation tasks: (1) Phase Boundary Detection (span segmentation under phase-specific acceptance rules) and (2) Compliance Verification (IC/PC decisions given fixed spans). Per-phase scores are strong across small, low-latency baselines, but end-to-end reliability is constrained by span-boundary errors. On real calls, full-call exact segmentation is low, showing a gap between conversational fluency and audit-grade evidence.

Related papers

• Case2Flow: Bridging Patient Cases and Guideline Flowcharts through Multimodal Retrieval [65.99409194536337]
  Case2Flow is a task designed to retrieve the most relevant guideline flowchart for a given patient case.<n> FlowAtlas is a curated corpus of 202 flowcharts extracted from 2,080 medical guidelines.<n> CRISP is a training-free scoring method that sharpens late-interaction retrieval by suppressing uninformative patches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-26T21:27:22Z)
• Agentic AI-based Framework for Mitigating Premature Diagnostic Handoff and Silent Hallucination in Healthcare Applications [17.69274632062373]
  Open-ended conversational agents remain prone to two critical failure modes: premature diagnostic handoff and silent clinical hallucinations.<n>We propose a multi-agent framework that addresses both issues by replacing LLM-as-a-judge'' routing with deterministic orchestration constraints.<n>We evaluate the system using simulated patient agents powered by the llama-3.1-70b-instruct model on 150 test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T15:39:19Z)
• AgentBeats: Agentifying Agent Assessment for Openness, Standardization, and Reproducibility [104.46861849039357]
  Agent systems are advancing quickly across domains, but their evaluation remains fragmented.<n>The root problem is the lack of an open, agent-agnostic assessment interface.<n>We advocate Agentified Agent Assessment (AAA), where evaluation is performed by judge agents and all participants interact through standardized protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T17:23:54Z)
• What to Test Next: Interpretable Coverage Gap Discovery in Driving VLMs [52.50210189669399]
  Driving vision-language models (VLMs) must accurately understand scenes across diverse conditions defined by Operational Design Domains (ODDs)<n>We propose SliceScorer, a deterministic scoring rule for missing-slice recommendation.<n>We show that SliceNav surfaces high-risk coverage gaps more effectively than prior slice-discovery methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T03:18:01Z)
• ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms [36.94429692322632]
  ADAPTS (Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms) is a framework for automated rating of depression and anxiety severity.<n>This approach decomposes long-form clinical interviews into symptom-specific reasoning tasks.<n>Ratings approximated expert benchmarks more closely than original human ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T23:08:42Z)
• Agentic Cognitive Profiling: Realigning Automated Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Clinical Construct Validity [66.94391219005291]
  This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic.<n>Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling.<n>ACP achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T06:15:35Z)
• When the Specification Emerges: Benchmarking Faithfulness Loss in Long-Horizon Coding Agents [15.65681557926802]
  Real research coding often does not: the intended system is progressively disclosed through in- teraction.<n>We introduce a benchmark for this setting and study faithfulne Ss Loss U nder eM ergent s Pecification (SLUMP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T19:53:35Z)
• Automated Self-Testing as a Quality Gate: Evidence-Driven Release Management for LLM Applications [51.56484100374058]
  We present an automated self-testing framework that introduces quality gates with evidence-based release decisions.<n>We evaluate the framework through a longitudinal case study of an internally deployed multi-agent conversational AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T20:44:15Z)
• A Multi-Agent Framework for Medical AI: Leveraging Fine-Tuned GPT, LLaMA, and DeepSeek R1 for Evidence-Based and Bias-Aware Clinical Query Processing [0.4349324020366305]
  Large language models (LLMs) show promise for healthcare question answering, but clinical use is limited by weak verification, insufficient evidence grounding, and unreliable confidence signalling.<n>We propose a multi-agent medical QA framework that combines complementary LLMs with evidence retrieval, uncertainty estimation, and bias checks to improve answer reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T14:17:27Z)
• Wigner's Friend as a Circuit: Inter-Branch Communication Witness Benchmarks on Superconducting Quantum Hardware [0.0]
  We implement and benchmark on IBM Quantum hardware the circuit family proposed by Violaris for estimating inter-branch communication witnesses.<n>We realize a five-qubit instance of the protocol as an inter-register message-transfer pattern within a single circuit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T14:30:09Z)
• All Required, In Order: Phase-Level Evaluation for AI-Human Dialogue in Healthcare and Beyond [40.157413213893165]
  We introduce Obligatory-Information Phase Structured Compliance Evaluation (OIP-SCE)<n>OIP-SCE checks whether every required clinical obligation is met, in the right order, with clear evidence for clinicians to review.<n>This makes complex rules practical and auditable, helping close the gap between technical progress and what healthcare actually needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T16:15:38Z)
• Benchmarking Egocentric Clinical Intent Understanding Capability for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [48.95516224614331]
  We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation.<n>Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical, and implicit adherence to safety protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T02:20:40Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Guardrails for AI-Drafted Patient-Portal Messages: Error Taxonomy Construction and Large-Scale Evaluation [5.555479009357263]
  Asynchronous patient-clinician messaging via EHR portals is a growing source of clinician workload.<n>Our contributions are threefold: (1) we introduce a clinically grounded error ontology comprising 5 domains and 59 granular error codes; (2) we develop a retrieval-augmented evaluation pipeline; and (3) we provide a two-stage prompting architecture using DSPy to enable scalable, interpretable, and hierarchical error detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:42:43Z)
• VulAgent: Hypothesis-Validation based Multi-Agent Vulnerability Detection [55.957275374847484]
  VulAgent is a multi-agent vulnerability detection framework based on hypothesis validation.<n>It implements a semantics-sensitive, multi-view detection pipeline, each aligned to a specific analysis perspective.<n>On average, VulAgent improves overall accuracy by 6.6%, increases the correct identification rate of vulnerable--fixed code pairs by up to 450%, and reduces the false positive rate by about 36%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T02:25:38Z)
• METER: Multi-modal Evidence-based Thinking and Explainable Reasoning -- Algorithm and Benchmark [48.78602579128459]
  We introduce METER, a unified benchmark for interpretable forgery detection spanning images, videos, audio, and audio-visual content.<n>Our dataset comprises four tracks, each requiring not only real-vs-fake classification but also evidence-chain-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T03:42:51Z)
• Claim Check-Worthiness Detection: How Well do LLMs Grasp Annotation Guidelines? [0.0]
  We use zero- and few-shot LLM prompting to identify text segments requiring fact-checking. We evaluate the LLMs' predictive and calibration accuracy on five CD/CW datasets from diverse domains. Our results show that optimal prompt verbosity is domain-dependent, adding context does not improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T13:31:05Z)
• End-to-End Page-Level Assessment of Handwritten Text Recognition [69.55992406968495]
  HTR systems increasingly face the end-to-end page-level transcription of a document. Standard metrics do not take into account the inconsistencies that might appear. We propose a two-fold evaluation, where the transcription accuracy and the RO goodness are considered separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T15:43:07Z)
• Benchmarking Quality-Dependent and Cost-Sensitive Score-Level Multimodal Biometric Fusion Algorithms [58.156733807470395]
  This paper reports a benchmarking study carried out within the framework of the BioSecure DS2 (Access Control) evaluation campaign. The campaign targeted the application of physical access control in a medium-size establishment with some 500 persons. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to benchmark quality-based multimodal fusion algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T13:39:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.