Charting the Future of AI-supported Science Education: A Human-Centered Vision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18471v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:06:00 GMT
• Title: Charting the Future of AI-supported Science Education: A Human-Centered Vision
• Authors: Xiaoming Zhai, Kent Crippen,
• Abstract summary: The chapter synthesizes developments across five dimensions: educational goals, instructional procedures, learning materials, assessment, and outcomes.<n>We argue that AI offers transformative potential to enrich inquiry, personalize learning, and support teacher practice, but only when guided by Responsible and Ethical Principles (REP)<n>The REP framework, emphasizing fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, and respect for human values, anchors our vision for AI-supported science education.
• Score: 0.9851520275517003
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This concluding chapter explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the purposes, practices, and outcomes of science education, and proposes a human-centered framework for its responsible integration. Drawing on insights from international collaborations and the Advancing AI in Science Education (AASE) committee, the chapter synthesizes developments across five dimensions: educational goals, instructional procedures, learning materials, assessment, and outcomes. We argue that AI offers transformative potential to enrich inquiry, personalize learning, and support teacher practice, but only when guided by Responsible and Ethical Principles (REP). The REP framework, emphasizing fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, and respect for human values, anchors our vision for AI-supported science education. Key discussions include the redefinition of scientific literacy to encompass AI literacy, the evolving roles of teachers and learners in AI-supported classrooms, and the design of adaptive learning materials and assessments that preserve authenticity and integrity. We highlight both opportunities and risks, stressing the need for critical engagement with AI to avoid reinforcing inequities or undermining human agency. Ultimately, this chapter advances a vision in which science education prepares learners to act as ethical investigators and responsible citizens, ensuring that AI innovation aligns with human dignity, equity, and the broader goals of scientific literacy.

Related papers

• The Landscape of AI in Science Education: What is Changing and How to Respond [0.9851520275517003]
  This chapter explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in reshaping the landscape of science education.<n>We highlight how AI-supported tools, such as intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning platforms, automated feedback, and generative content creation, enhance personalization, efficiency, and equity.<n>At the same time, this chapter examines the ethical, social, and pedagogical challenges that arise, particularly issues of fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T23:54:23Z)
• Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment in Education for Trustworthy Learning Environments [7.0064528229443]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, offering unprecedented opportunities to personalize learning, enhance assessment, and support educators.<n>Yet these opportunities also introduce risks related to equity, privacy, and student autonomy.<n>This chapter develops the concept of bidirectional human-AI alignment in education, emphasizing that trustworthy learning environments arise not only from embedding human values into AI systems but also from equipping teachers, students, and institutions with the skills to interpret, critique, and guide these technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T07:50:56Z)
• Report on the Scoping Workshop on AI in Science Education Research 2025 [2.0613397238713778]
  Report summarizes the outcomes of a two-day international scoping workshop on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education research.<n>As AI rapidly reshapes scientific practice, classroom learning, and research methods, the field faces both new opportunities and significant challenges.<n>Report concludes with actionable recommendations for training, infrastructure, and standards, along with guidance for funders, policymakers, professional organizations, and academic departments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:23:22Z)
• Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
  Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education.<n>We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the Ethos of AI-driven Higher education [0.6216023343793144]
  This study introduces the Human-Driven AI in Higher Education (HD-AIHED) Framework to ensure compliance with UNESCO and OECD ethical standards.<n>The study applies a participatory co-system, Phased Human Intelligence, SWOC analysis, and AI ethical review boards to assess AI readiness and governance strategies for universities and HE institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T11:13:31Z)
• Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
  This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• From Algorithm Worship to the Art of Human Learning: Insights from 50-year journey of AI in Education [0.0]
  Current discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) oscillates between hope and apprehension. This paper delves into the complexities of AI's role in Education, addressing the mixed messages that have both enthused and alarmed educators. It explores the promises that AI holds for enhancing learning through personalisation at scale, against the backdrop of concerns about ethical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T16:12:14Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.