Rodent-Bench

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18540v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 15:14:38 GMT
• Title: Rodent-Bench
• Authors: Thomas Heap, Laurence Aitchison, Emma Cahill, Adriana Casado Rodriguez,
• Abstract summary: We present Rodent-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to annotate rodent behaviour footage.<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs, including Gemini-2.5-Pro, Gemini-2.5-Flash and Qwen-VL-Max, using this benchmark and find that none of these models perform strongly enough to be used as an assistant for this task.
• Score: 14.876393544574688
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present Rodent-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to annotate rodent behaviour footage. We evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs, including Gemini-2.5-Pro, Gemini-2.5-Flash and Qwen-VL-Max, using this benchmark and find that none of these models perform strongly enough to be used as an assistant for this task. Our benchmark encompasses diverse datasets spanning multiple behavioral paradigms including social interactions, grooming, scratching, and freezing behaviors, with videos ranging from 10 minutes to 35 minutes in length. We provide two benchmark versions to accommodate varying model capabilities and establish standardized evaluation metrics including second-wise accuracy, macro F1, mean average precision, mutual information, and Matthew's correlation coefficient. While some models show modest performance on certain datasets (notably grooming detection), overall results reveal significant challenges in temporal segmentation, handling extended video sequences, and distinguishing subtle behavioral states. Our analysis identifies key limitations in current MLLMs for scientific video annotation and provides insights for future model development. Rodent-Bench serves as a foundation for tracking progress toward reliable automated behavioral annotation in neuroscience research.

Related papers

• Preliminary Use of Vision Language Model Driven Extraction of Mouse Behavior Towards Understanding Fear Expression [5.170961907232911]
  This work establishes a vision-language model (VLM) that encodes videos with text input in order to classify various behaviors of a mouse.<n>We use the open-source Qwen2.5-VL model and enhance its performance through prompts, in-context learning (ICL) with labeled examples, and frame-level preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T01:33:39Z)
• Boosting Micro-Expression Analysis via Prior-Guided Video-Level Regression [15.099304324307434]
  Micro-expressions (MEs) are involuntary, low-intensity, and short-duration facial expressions.<n>Most existing ME analysis methods rely on window-level classification with fixed window sizes and hard decisions.<n>We propose a prior-guided video-level regression method for ME analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T09:13:36Z)
• HumanVideo-MME: Benchmarking MLLMs for Human-Centric Video Understanding [120.84817886550765]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant advances in visual understanding tasks involving both images and videos.<n>Existing human-centric benchmarks predominantly emphasize video generation quality and action recognition, while overlooking essential perceptual and cognitive abilities required in human-centered scenarios.<n>We propose a rigorously curated benchmark designed to provide a more holistic evaluation of MLLMs in human-centric video understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T11:52:24Z)
• TemporalBench: Benchmarking Fine-grained Temporal Understanding for Multimodal Video Models [75.42002690128486]
  TemporalBench is a new benchmark dedicated to evaluating fine-grained temporal understanding in videos. It consists of 10K video question-answer pairs, derived from 2K high-quality human annotations detailing the temporal dynamics in video clips. Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4o achieve only 38.5% question answering accuracy on TemporalBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:59:58Z)
• LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
  We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.<n>LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.<n>We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z)
• MM-SpuBench: Towards Better Understanding of Spurious Biases in Multimodal LLMs [38.93090238335506]
  Spurious bias, a tendency to use spurious correlations between non-essential input attributes and target variables for predictions, has revealed a severe pitfall in deep learning models trained on single modality data. We introduce MM-SpuBench, a comprehensive visual question-answering (VQA) benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' reliance on nine distinct categories of spurious correlations. Our findings illuminate the persistence of the reliance on spurious correlations from these models and underscore the urge for new methodologies to mitigate spurious biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T20:29:16Z)
• VANE-Bench: Video Anomaly Evaluation Benchmark for Conversational LMMs [64.60035916955837]
  VANE-Bench is a benchmark designed to assess the proficiency of Video-LMMs in detecting anomalies and inconsistencies in videos.<n>Our dataset comprises an array of videos synthetically generated using existing state-of-the-art text-to-video generation models.<n>We evaluate nine existing Video-LMMs, both open and closed sources, on this benchmarking task and find that most of the models encounter difficulties in effectively identifying the subtle anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:59:01Z)
• MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark [63.14000659130736]
  We introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench. We first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T17:59:04Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.