Evaluating SAP RPT-1 for Enterprise Business Process Prediction: In-Context Learning vs. Traditional Machine Learning on Structured SAP Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19237v1
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 15:29:52 GMT
- Title: Evaluating SAP RPT-1 for Enterprise Business Process Prediction: In-Context Learning vs. Traditional Machine Learning on Structured SAP Data
- Abstract summary: This paper presents the first independent evaluation of SAP's Retrieval Pretrained Transformer (RPT-1) from a practitioner perspective.<n>RPT-1 is a compact 64.6 MB model pretrained on 1.34 TB of structured data across 3.1 million tables.<n>We benchmark it against tuned gradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) on three SAP business scenarios.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Tabular foundation models aim to make machine learning accessible for enterprise data without task-specific training. This paper presents the first independent evaluation of SAP's Retrieval Pretrained Transformer (RPT-1) from a practitioner perspective. RPT-1 is a compact 64.6 MB model pretrained on 1.34 TB of structured data across 3.1 million tables. We benchmark it against tuned gradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) on three SAP business scenarios: demand forecasting across SD/MM/PP modules, predictive data integrity in BC/MM/QM, and financial risk classification in FI/CO/AR. Across five-fold cross-validation on datasets ranging from 2,500 to 3,200 rows, RPT-1 reaches 91-96% of tuned GBDT accuracy without any training examples. The classification gap is modest at 3.6-4.1 percentage points on AUC-ROC, though regression tasks show wider gaps of 8.9-11.1 percentage points on R-squared. An interesting finding is a crossover at roughly 75-100 context rows where RPT-1 actually outperforms XGBoost under limited data. Based on these results, we propose a practical hybrid workflow: use RPT-1 for rapid screening, then train GBDT selectively where prediction accuracy justifies the effort. All experiments are reproducible through publicly available Hugging Face Spaces.
Related papers
- Models for minimalist RAG: B1ade 335M Embedding and 1B Parameter Small Language Models [2.1665689529884697]
We present B1ade, an efficient RAG architecture comprising two purpose-built components: a compact embedding model and a purpose-built SLM.<n>B1ade-embed, a 335M parameter retrieval model constructed via parameter-free fusion of five pretrained encoders achieves top MTEB scores among sub-500M models with zero additional training.<n>B1ade-1B cites retrieved passages in 42.4% of responses, exceeding the attribution rate of its training distribution by 5.5 percentage points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-29T22:41:25Z) - TabH2O: A Unified Foundation Model for Tabular Prediction [12.882141870947706]
We present TabH2O, a model that performs classification and regression in a single forward pass via in-context learning.<n>We evaluate TabH2O v1 (29.2M parameters) on the TALENT benchmark, where it achieves an average rank of 2.55 out of 6 evaluated methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T13:27:54Z) - Prior-Aligned Data Cleaning for Tabular Foundation Models [0.261072980439312]
Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) achieve state-of-the-art zero-shot accuracy on small datasets by meta-learning over synthetic data-generating processes.<n>In-context learning mechanism assumes approximately clean inputs, missing values, outliers, and duplicates in the real-world data create a prior mismatch that degrades both accuracy and confidence calibration simultaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T02:56:17Z) - Architecture-Agnostic Curriculum Learning for Document Understanding: Empirical Evidence from Text-Only and Multimodal [13.329839705160927]
We investigate whether progressive data scheduling yields consistent efficiency gains across document understanding models.<n>We establish that this schedule reduces wall-clock training time by approximately 33%, commensurate with the reduction from 6.67 to 10.0 effective epoch-reductions of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T10:09:26Z) - A Comprehensive Forecasting-Based Framework for Time Series Anomaly Detection: Benchmarking on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB) [0.0]
Time series anomaly detection is critical for modern digital infrastructures.<n>We present a forecasting-based framework unifying classical methods with deep learning architectures.<n>We conduct the first complete evaluation on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T08:31:42Z) - MobileLLM-R1: Exploring the Limits of Sub-Billion Language Model Reasoners with Open Training Recipes [60.57770396565211]
We show that strong reasoning abilities can emerge with far less data.<n>MobileLLM-R50M achieves an AIME score of 15.5, compared to just 0.6 for OLMo-2-1.48B and 0.3 for SmolLM-2-1.7B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T15:43:59Z) - Table-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table Reasoning [56.812846737424245]
We develop and evaluate two post-training strategies to enable inference-time scaling.<n>For distillation, we introduce a large-scale dataset of reasoning traces generated by DeepSeek-R1.<n>For RLVR, we propose task-specific verifiable reward functions and apply the GRPO algorithm to obtain the Table-R1-Zero model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T16:28:50Z) - Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data [39.40116554523575]
We present Drift-Resilient TabPFN, a fresh approach based on In-Context Learning with a Prior-Data Fitted Network.
It learns to approximate Bayesian inference on synthetic datasets drawn from a prior.
It improves accuracy from 0.688 to 0.744 and ROC AUC from 0.786 to 0.832 while maintaining stronger calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T23:49:23Z) - DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets [179.79323076587255]
DataComp is a testbed for dataset experiments centered around a new candidate pool of 12.8 billion image-text pairs from Common Crawl.
Our benchmark consists of multiple compute scales spanning four orders of magnitude.
In particular, our best baseline, DataComp-1B, enables training a CLIP ViT-L/14 from scratch to 79.2% zero-shot accuracy on ImageNet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-27T11:37:18Z) - A Meta-Learning Approach to Predicting Performance and Data Requirements [163.4412093478316]
We propose an approach to estimate the number of samples required for a model to reach a target performance.
We find that the power law, the de facto principle to estimate model performance, leads to large error when using a small dataset.
We introduce a novel piecewise power law (PPL) that handles the two data differently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T21:48:22Z) - Evaluating Parameter Efficient Learning for Generation [32.52577462253145]
We present comparisons between PERMs and finetuning from three new perspectives.
Our results show that for in-domain settings (a) there is a cross point of sample size for which PERMs will perform better than finetuning when training with fewer samples, and (b) larger PLMs.
We also compare the faithfulness of generations and show that PERMs can achieve better faithfulness score than finetuning, especially for small training set, by as much as 6%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-25T00:14:48Z) - Exploring the Value of Pre-trained Language Models for Clinical Named
Entity Recognition [6.917786124918387]
We compare Transformer models that are trained from scratch to fine-tuned BERT-based LLMs.
We examine the impact of an additional CRF layer on such models to encourage contextual learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T16:27:31Z) - Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language
Models [107.05966685291067]
We propose test-time prompt tuning (TPT) to learn adaptive prompts on the fly with a single test sample.
TPT improves the zero-shot top-1 accuracy of CLIP by 3.6% on average.
In evaluating cross-dataset generalization with unseen categories, TPT performs on par with the state-of-the-art approaches that use additional training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-15T17:55:11Z) - Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization
Influence [30.30255670341501]
Do all training data contribute to model's performance?
How to construct a smallest subset from the entire training data as a proxy training set without significantly sacrificing the model's performance?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T05:36:35Z) - Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Transformer-Based Person
Re-Identification [54.55281692768765]
Transformer-based supervised pre-training achieves great performance in person re-identification (ReID)
Due to the domain gap between ImageNet and ReID datasets, it usually needs a larger pre-training dataset to boost the performance.
This work aims to mitigate the gap between the pre-training and ReID datasets from the perspective of data and model structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-23T18:59:08Z) - Jigsaw Clustering for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning [68.09280490213399]
We propose a new jigsaw clustering pretext task in this paper.
Our method makes use of information from both intra- and inter-images.
It is even comparable to the contrastive learning methods when only half of training batches are used.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-01T08:09:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.