Meta-Learning and Meta-Reinforcement Learning - Tracing the Path towards DeepMind's Adaptive Agent

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19837v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:39:58 GMT
• Title: Meta-Learning and Meta-Reinforcement Learning - Tracing the Path towards DeepMind's Adaptive Agent
• Authors: Björn Hoppmann, Christoph Scholz,
• Abstract summary: Humans are highly effective at utilizing prior knowledge to adapt to novel tasks.<n>This survey provides a rigorous, task-based formalization of meta-learning and meta-reinforcement learning.
• Score: 0.3906427348768226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Humans are highly effective at utilizing prior knowledge to adapt to novel tasks, a capability that standard machine learning models struggle to replicate due to their reliance on task-specific training. Meta-learning overcomes this limitation by allowing models to acquire transferable knowledge from various tasks, enabling rapid adaptation to new challenges with minimal data. This survey provides a rigorous, task-based formalization of meta-learning and meta-reinforcement learning and uses that paradigm to chronicle the landmark algorithms that paved the way for DeepMind's Adaptive Agent, consolidating the essential concepts needed to understand the Adaptive Agent and other generalist approaches.

Related papers

• TLXML: Task-Level Explanation of Meta-Learning via Influence Functions [0.23090185577016445]
  We propose influence functions for explaining meta-learning that measure the sensitivities of training tasks to adaptation and inference.<n>We also argue that the approximation of the Hessian using the Gauss-Newton matrix resolves computational barriers peculiar to meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T06:31:48Z)
• Learning to Learn with Contrastive Meta-Objective [48.27877062976768]
  We propose to exploit task identity as additional supervision in meta-training.<n>The proposed ConML is evaluating and optimizing the contrastive meta-objective.<n>We demonstrate that ConML integrates seamlessly with existing meta-learners, as well as in-context learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T12:22:10Z)
• Rethinking Meta-Learning from a Learning Lens [35.98940987691948]
  We consider how to bridge the gap between theoretical understanding and practical implementation of meta-learning.<n>We propose TRLearner, a plug-and-play method that leverages task relation to calibrate meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T02:00:16Z)
• Efficient Meta Reinforcement Learning for Preference-based Fast Adaptation [17.165083095799712]
  We study the problem of few-shot adaptation in the context of human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning. We develop a meta-RL algorithm that enables fast policy adaptation with preference-based feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-20T03:55:09Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Fine-tuning Versus Meta-reinforcement Learning [71.55412580325743]
  We show that multi-task pretraining with fine-tuning on new tasks performs equally as well, or better, than meta-pretraining with meta test-time adaptation. This is encouraging for future research, as multi-task pretraining tends to be simpler and computationally cheaper than meta-RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T13:24:00Z)
• Skill-based Meta-Reinforcement Learning [65.31995608339962]
  We devise a method that enables meta-learning on long-horizon, sparse-reward tasks. Our core idea is to leverage prior experience extracted from offline datasets during meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T17:58:19Z)
• Fully Online Meta-Learning Without Task Boundaries [80.09124768759564]
  We study how meta-learning can be applied to tackle online problems of this nature. We propose a Fully Online Meta-Learning (FOML) algorithm, which does not require any ground truth knowledge about the task boundaries. Our experiments show that FOML was able to learn new tasks faster than the state-of-the-art online learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T07:51:24Z)
• Learning an Explicit Hyperparameter Prediction Function Conditioned on Tasks [62.63852372239708]
  Meta learning aims to learn the learning methodology for machine learning from observed tasks, so as to generalize to new query tasks. We interpret such learning methodology as learning an explicit hyper- parameter prediction function shared by all training tasks. Such setting guarantees that the meta-learned learning methodology is able to flexibly fit diverse query tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T04:05:08Z)
• Meta-Learning with Fewer Tasks through Task Interpolation [67.03769747726666]
  Current meta-learning algorithms require a large number of meta-training tasks, which may not be accessible in real-world scenarios. By meta-learning with task gradient (MLTI), our approach effectively generates additional tasks by randomly sampling a pair of tasks and interpolating the corresponding features and labels. Empirically, in our experiments on eight datasets from diverse domains, we find that the proposed general MLTI framework is compatible with representative meta-learning algorithms and consistently outperforms other state-of-the-art strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T20:15:34Z)
• Meta-Reinforcement Learning Robust to Distributional Shift via Model Identification and Experience Relabeling [126.69933134648541]
  We present a meta-reinforcement learning algorithm that is both efficient and extrapolates well when faced with out-of-distribution tasks at test time. Our method is based on a simple insight: we recognize that dynamics models can be adapted efficiently and consistently with off-policy data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T13:34:46Z)
• Automated Relational Meta-learning [95.02216511235191]
  We propose an automated relational meta-learning framework that automatically extracts the cross-task relations and constructs the meta-knowledge graph. We conduct extensive experiments on 2D toy regression and few-shot image classification and the results demonstrate the superiority of ARML over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T07:02:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.