Model Merging in the Essential Subspace

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20208v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:33:38 GMT
• Title: Model Merging in the Essential Subspace
• Abstract summary: Model merging aims to integrate multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model without additional training.<n>Despite extensive research, task interference remains a major obstacle that often undermines the performance of merged models.<n>We propose ESM (Essential Subspace Merging), a robust framework for effective model merging.
• Score: 78.5390284258307
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model merging aims to integrate multiple task-specific fine-tuned models derived from a shared pre-trained checkpoint into a single multi-task model without additional training. Despite extensive research, task interference remains a major obstacle that often undermines the performance of merged models. In this paper, we propose ESM (Essential Subspace Merging) , a robust framework for effective model merging. We begin by performing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on feature shifts induced by parameter updates. The resulting principal directions span an essential subspace that dominantly influences feature representations. Each task's parameter update matrix is projected onto its respective essential subspace for low-rank decomposition before merging. This methodology mitigates inter-task interference while preserving core task-specific functionality. Furthermore, we introduce a multi-level polarized scaling strategy that amplifies parameters containing critical knowledge and suppresses redundant ones, preventing essential knowledge from being overwhelmed during fusion. Extensive experiments across multiple task sets and model scales demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in multi-task model merging.

Related papers

• Essential Subspace Merging for Multi-Task Learning [78.5390284258307]
  We analyze the output shifts induced by task updates and observe that their energy is concentrated in a small number of principal directions.<n>Most remaining directions carry little task-relevant energy, but their accumulation across multiple task updates can cause severe interference during merging.<n>Based on ESD, we introduce Essential Subspace Merging (ESM), a training-free static merging method.<n>We extend ESM to ESM++, a training-free dynamic merging method that decomposes task-specific residuals into low-rank experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T15:07:11Z)
• PACT: Preserving Anchored Cores in Task-vectors for Model Merging [68.52455853496585]
  Model merging aims to combine multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model.<n>Most existing model merging approaches follow the Task Arithmetic paradigm.<n>We propose PACT, which preserves the anchored task-specific cores (i.e., LBW dimensions) within task vectors by aligning their complements with the subspace of the pre-trained weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T02:48:35Z)
• Decomposing the Basic Abilities of Large Language Models: Mitigating Cross-Task Interference in Multi-Task Instruct-Tuning [58.90602461025722]
  Multi-task instruct-tuning in large language models (LLMs) has been largely driven by multi-task instruct-tuning.<n>The training paradigm suffers from a key issue, named cross-task interference, due to conflicting gradients over shared parameters among different tasks.<n>We propose BADIT that decomposes LLM parameters into high-singular-value LoRA experts representing basic abilities.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on the SuperNI benchmark with 6 LLMs, and empirical results demonstrate that BADIT can outperform SOTA methods and mitigate the degree of cross-task interference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T05:08:58Z)
• Purifying Task Vectors in Knowledge-Aware Subspace for Model Merging [83.5273168208788]
  Model merging aims to integrate task-specific abilities from individually fine-tuned models into a single model without extra training.<n>The merged model often suffers from notable performance degradation due to the conflicts caused by task-irrelevant redundancy in task vectors.<n>We propose Purifying TAsk Vectors (PAVE) in knowledge-aware subspace to overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T14:02:57Z)
• Unraveling LoRA Interference: Orthogonal Subspaces for Robust Model Merging [38.12136955174922]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LMs) for individual tasks yields strong performance but is expensive for deployment and storage.<n>Recent works explore model merging to combine multiple task-specific models into a single multi-task model without additional training.<n>Existing merging methods often fail for models fine-tuned with low-rank adaptation (LoRA), due to significant performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T23:28:12Z)
• RobustMerge: Parameter-Efficient Model Merging for MLLMs with Direction Robustness [28.437105789298244]
  RobustMerge is a training-free parameter-efficient merging method with complementary parameter adaptation to maintain direction robustness.<n>We establish a benchmark consisting of diverse multimodal tasks, on which we conduct experiments to certify the outstanding performance and generalizability of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T13:52:05Z)
• No Task Left Behind: Isotropic Model Merging with Common and Task-Specific Subspaces [17.69597528370121]
  Model merging integrates the weights of multiple task-specific models into a single multi-task model.<n>Despite recent interest in the problem, a significant performance gap between the combined and single-task models remains.<n>We show that alignment between singular components of task-specific and merged matrices strongly correlates with performance improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T14:22:56Z)
• Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descent [72.10987117380584]
  Merging multiple expert models offers a promising approach for performing multi-task learning without accessing their original data.<n>We find existing methods discard task-specific information that, while causing conflicts, is crucial for performance.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving state-of-the-art results across diverse architectures and tasks in both vision and NLP domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T12:45:21Z)
• Concrete Subspace Learning based Interference Elimination for Multi-task Model Fusion [86.6191592951269]
  Merging models fine-tuned from common extensively pretrained large model but specialized for different tasks has been demonstrated as a cheap and scalable strategy to construct a multitask model that performs well across diverse tasks. We propose the CONtinuous relaxation dis (Concrete) subspace learning method to identify a common lowdimensional subspace and utilize its shared information track interference problem without sacrificing performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T07:24:54Z)
• AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learning [68.75885518081357]
  This paper introduces an innovative technique called Adaptive Model Merging (AdaMerging) It aims to autonomously learn the coefficients for model merging, either in a task-wise or layer-wise manner, without relying on the original training data. Compared to the current state-of-the-art task arithmetic merging scheme, AdaMerging showcases a remarkable 11% improvement in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T04:26:33Z)
• TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models [95.59265307318752]
  Transfer learning can confer significant advantages, including improved downstream performance, faster convergence, and better sample efficiency. Model merging has emerged as a solution to combine multiple task-specific models into a single model without performing additional training. Existing merging methods often ignore the interference between parameters of different models, resulting in large performance drops when merging multiple models. We propose TIES-Merging, which introduces three novel steps when merging models: resetting parameters that only changed a small amount during fine-tuning, resolving sign conflicts, and merging only the parameters that are in alignment with the final agreed-upon sign.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T17:31:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.