Enhancing Hate Speech Detection on Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models and Text Transformation Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20634v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 07:26:17 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Hate Speech Detection on Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models and Text Transformation Approaches
• Authors: Saurabh Mishra, Shivani Thakur, Radhika Mamidi,
• Abstract summary: This study evaluates the efficacy of various machine learning models in identifying hate speech and offensive language.<n>We introduce innovative text transformation approaches that convert negative expressions into neutral ones, thereby potentially mitigating the impact of harmful content.
• Score: 4.75370717332176
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of hate speech on social media platforms has necessitated the development of effective detection and moderation tools. This study evaluates the efficacy of various machine learning models in identifying hate speech and offensive language and investigates the potential of text transformation techniques to neutralize such content. We compare traditional models like CNNs and LSTMs with advanced neural network models such as BERT and its derivatives, alongside exploring hybrid models that combine different architectural features. Our results indicate that while advanced models like BERT show superior accuracy due to their deep contextual understanding, hybrid models exhibit improved capabilities in certain scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce innovative text transformation approaches that convert negative expressions into neutral ones, thereby potentially mitigating the impact of harmful content. The implications of these findings are discussed, highlighting the strengths and limitations of current technologies and proposing future directions for more robust hate speech detection systems.

Related papers

• Unmasking Digital Falsehoods: A Comparative Analysis of LLM-Based Misinformation Detection Strategies [0.0]
  This paper conducts a comparison of approaches to detecting misinformation between text-based, multimodal, and agentic approaches.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of fine-tuned models, zero-shot learning, and systematic fact-checking mechanisms in detecting misinformation across different topic domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T04:31:42Z)
• Analyzing Persuasive Strategies in Meme Texts: A Fusion of Language Models with Paraphrase Enrichment [0.23020018305241333]
  This paper describes our approach to hierarchical multi-label detection of persuasion techniques in meme texts. The scope of the study encompasses enhancing model performance through innovative training techniques and data augmentation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:25:20Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• A Multimodal Fusion Network For Student Emotion Recognition Based on Transformer and Tensor Product [4.528221075598755]
  This paper introduces a new multi-modal model based on the Transformer architecture and tensor product fusion strategy. It combines BERT's text vectors and ViT's image vectors to classify students' psychological conditions, with an accuracy of 93.65%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T13:16:26Z)
• SA-Attack: Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Self-Augmentation [56.622250514119294]
  In contrast to white-box adversarial attacks, transfer attacks are more reflective of real-world scenarios. We propose a self-augment-based transfer attack method, termed SA-Attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:08:50Z)
• RenAIssance: A Survey into AI Text-to-Image Generation in the Era of Large Model [93.8067369210696]
  Text-to-image generation (TTI) refers to the usage of models that could process text input and generate high fidelity images based on text descriptions. Diffusion models are one prominent type of generative model used for the generation of images through the systematic introduction of noises with repeating steps. In the era of large models, scaling up model size and the integration with large language models have further improved the performance of TTI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T03:27:20Z)
• Hate Speech and Offensive Language Detection using an Emotion-aware Shared Encoder [1.8734449181723825]
  Existing works on hate speech and offensive language detection produce promising results based on pre-trained transformer models. This paper addresses a multi-task joint learning approach which combines external emotional features extracted from another corpora. Our findings demonstrate that emotional knowledge helps to more reliably identify hate speech and offensive language across datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T09:31:06Z)
• CausalDialogue: Modeling Utterance-level Causality in Conversations [83.03604651485327]
  We have compiled and expanded upon a new dataset called CausalDialogue through crowd-sourcing. This dataset includes multiple cause-effect pairs within a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure. We propose a causality-enhanced method called Exponential Average Treatment Effect (ExMATE) to enhance the impact of causality at the utterance level in training neural conversation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:31:50Z)
• Panning for gold: Lessons learned from the platform-agnostic automated detection of political content in textual data [48.7576911714538]
  We discuss how these techniques can be used to detect political content across different platforms. We compare the performance of three groups of detection techniques relying on dictionaries, supervised machine learning, or neural networks. Our results show the limited impact of preprocessing on model performance, with the best results for less noisy data being achieved by neural network- and machine-learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T15:23:23Z)
• Exploring Dimensionality Reduction Techniques in Multilingual Transformers [64.78260098263489]
  This paper gives a comprehensive account of the impact of dimensional reduction techniques on the performance of state-of-the-art multilingual Siamese Transformers. It shows that it is possible to achieve an average reduction in the number of dimensions of $91.58% pm 2.59%$ and $54.65% pm 32.20%$, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T17:20:55Z)
• Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Transfer Learning from Speaker Recognition and BERT-based models [53.31917090073727]
  We propose a neural network-based emotion recognition framework that uses a late fusion of transfer-learned and fine-tuned models from speech and text modalities. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed multimodal approach on the interactive emotional dyadic motion capture dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T00:23:42Z)
• Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation [10.131671217810581]
  We propose an analysis of model robustness against linguistic variation in the setting of deceptive news detection. We consider two prediction tasks and compare three state-of-the-art embeddings to highlight consistent trends in model performance. We find that character or mixed ensemble models are the most effective defenses and that character perturbation-based attack tactics are more successful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-23T17:25:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.