AMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Agentic Applications
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22769v2
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 03:30:11 GMT
- Title: AMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Agentic Applications
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed as autonomous agents in increasingly complex applications.<n>Existing benchmarks primarily focus on dialogue-centric, human-agent interactions.<n>We propose AMA-Agent, a memory system featuring a causality graph and tool-augmented retrieval.
- Score: 34.74409546347656
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed as autonomous agents in increasingly complex applications, where enabling long-horizon memory is critical for achieving strong performance. However, a significant gap exists between practical applications and current evaluation standards for agent memory: existing benchmarks primarily focus on dialogue-centric, human-agent interactions. In reality, agent memory consists of a continuous stream of agent-environment interactions that are primarily composed of machine-generated representations. To bridge this gap, we introduce AMA-Bench (Agent Memory with Any length), which evaluates long-horizon memory for LLMs in real agentic applications. It features two key components: (1) a set of real-world agentic trajectories across representative agentic applications, paired with expert-curated QA, and (2) a set of synthetic agentic trajectories that scale to arbitrary horizons, paired with rule-based QA. Our comprehensive study shows that existing memory systems underperform on AMA-Bench primarily because they lack causality and objective information and are constrained by the lossy nature of similarity-based retrieval employed by many memory systems. To address these limitations, we propose AMA-Agent, an effective memory system featuring a causality graph and tool-augmented retrieval. Our results demonstrate that AMA-Agent achieves 57.22% average accuracy on AMA-Bench, surpassing the strongest memory system baselines by 11.16%.
Related papers
- Harness the Memory: A Holistic Evaluation of Memory Substrates in Memory Agents [97.19033877543522]
We present a controlled harness evaluation of memory substrates for memory-augmented agents.<n>We instrument 26 performance and efficiency metrics under a unified harness.<n>These findings motivate substrate routing as a necessary component of adaptive agent memory systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-15T03:29:48Z) - Mandol: An Agglomerative Agent Memory System for Long-Term Conversations [19.51654277630379]
Mandol is an agglomerative memory system that consolidates fragmented memory representations and storage into a unified memory-native architecture.<n>Mandol achieves the best overall accuracy among representative agent memory systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T04:43:29Z) - Exploring Cross-Scenario Generality of Agentic Memory Systems: Diagnostics and a Strong Baseline [39.29817461808327]
We revisit eight memory systems plus an agentic harness for search problems.<n>We instantiate this insight in AutoMEM, an agentic memory harness with a self-managed tool interface.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T00:42:49Z) - MINTEval: Evaluating Memory under Multi-Target Interference in Long-Horizon Agent Systems [69.06764269022925]
We study how current memory-augmented agents perform in realistic, interference-heavy, long-horizon settings.<n> MINTEval is a benchmark featuring long, highly interconnected contexts with frequently updated information.<n>Overall, MINTEval has 15.6k question-answering pairs over long-horizon contexts averaging 138.8k tokens and extending to 1.8M tokens per instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T15:43:35Z) - LongMemEval-V2: Evaluating Long-Term Agent Memory Toward Experienced Colleagues [80.29362825271768]
LongMemEval-V2 is a benchmark for evaluating whether memory systems can help agents acquire the experience needed to become knowledgeable colleagues in customized environments.<n>LME-V2 contains 451 manually curated questions covering five core memory abilities for web agents.<n>We propose a suite of two memory methods: AgentRunbook-R, an efficient RAG-based memory with knowledge pools for raw state observations, events, and strategy notes, and AgentRunbook-C, which stores trajectories as files and invokes a coding agent to gather evidence in an augmented sandbox.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T17:59:34Z) - AdaMem: Adaptive User-Centric Memory for Long-Horizon Dialogue Agents [49.63422082885992]
We propose AdaMem, an adaptive user-centric memory framework for long-horizon dialogue agents.<n>AdaMem organizes dialogue history into working, episodic, persona, and graph memories.<n>We evaluate AdaMem on the LoCoMo and PERSONAMEM benchmarks for long-horizon reasoning and user modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T13:22:54Z) - Structurally Aligned Subtask-Level Memory for Software Engineering Agents [15.239652771593663]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential as autonomous software engineering (SWE) agents.<n>Recent work has explored augmenting these agents with memory mechanisms to support long-horizon reasoning.<n>We propose Structurally Aligned Subtask-Level Memory to align memory storage, retrieval, and updating with the agent's functional decomposition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-25T06:13:25Z) - MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks [55.145729491377374]
Existing evaluations of agents with memory typically assess memorization and action in isolation.<n>We introduce MemoryArena, a unified evaluation gym for benchmarking agent memory in multi-session Memory-Agent-Environment loops.<n> MemoryArena supports evaluation across web navigation, preference-constrained planning, progressive information search, and sequential formal reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T09:49:14Z) - Enhancing Conversational Agents via Task-Oriented Adversarial Memory Adaptation [64.69535903624033]
We propose an Adversarial Memory Adaptation mechanism (AMA) that aligns memory construction and update with task objectives by simulating task execution.<n>AMA can be integrated into various existing memory systems, and extensive experiments on long dialogue benchmark LoCoMo demonstrate its effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T14:42:34Z) - AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration [54.490349689939166]
We propose Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration (AMA), a novel framework that leverages coordinated agents to manage memory across multiple granularities.<n>AMA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while reducing token consumption by approximately 80% compared to full-context methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T08:09:49Z) - Rethinking Memory Mechanisms of Foundation Agents in the Second Half: A Survey [211.01908189012184]
Memory, with hundreds of papers released this year, emerges as the critical solution to fill the utility gap.<n>We provide a unified view of foundation agent memory along three dimensions.<n>We then analyze how memory is instantiated and operated under different agent topologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T07:38:38Z) - Memory in the Age of AI Agents [217.9368190980982]
This work aims to provide an up-to-date landscape of current agent memory research.<n>We identify three dominant realizations of agent memory, namely token-level, parametric, and latent memory.<n>To support practical development, we compile a comprehensive summary of memory benchmarks and open-source frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-15T17:22:34Z) - Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions [22.190297901876278]
We identify four core competencies essential for memory agents: accurate retrieval, test-time learning, long-range understanding, and selective forgetting.<n>Existing benchmarks either rely on limited context lengths or are tailored for static, long-context settings like book-based QA.<n>We introduce MemoryAgentBench, a new benchmark specifically designed for memory agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T17:59:54Z) - Memory, Benchmark & Robots: A Benchmark for Solving Complex Tasks with Reinforcement Learning [41.94295877935867]
Memory is crucial for enabling agents to tackle complex tasks with temporal and spatial dependencies.<n>Many reinforcement learning algorithms incorporate memory, but the field lacks a universal benchmark to assess an agent's memory capabilities.<n>We introduce MIKASA, a comprehensive benchmark for memory RL, with three key contributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T20:46:19Z) - A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents [66.4963345269611]
Large language model (LLM) based agents have recently attracted much attention from the research and industry communities.
LLM-based agents are featured in their self-evolving capability, which is the basis for solving real-world problems.
The key component to support agent-environment interactions is the memory of the agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-21T01:49:46Z) - Memory Sharing for Large Language Model based Agents [43.53494041932615]
This paper introduces the Memory Sharing, a framework which integrates the real-time memory filter, storage and retrieval to enhance the In-Context Learning process.
The experimental results demonstrate that the MS framework significantly improves the agents' performance in addressing open-ended questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T17:57:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.