What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00510v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 07:13:36 GMT
• Title: What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models
• Authors: Yingqi Fan, Junlong Tong, Anhao Zhao, Xiaoyu Shen,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) project visual tokens into the embedding space of language models.<n>We introduce a two-fold analytical framework featuring a novel probing tool, $textLenEmbeds$, to conduct a fine-grained analysis.<n>We uncover a pronounced semantic sparsity at the input level: visual tokens consistently partition into sink, dead, and alive categories.
• Score: 9.530137749236617
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) project visual tokens into the embedding space of language models, yet the internal structuring and processing of visual semantics remain poorly understood. In this work, we introduce a two-fold analytical framework featuring a novel probing tool, $\textbf{EmbedLens}$, to conduct a fine-grained analysis. We uncover a pronounced semantic sparsity at the input level: visual tokens consistently partition into sink, dead, and alive categories. Remarkably, only the alive tokens, comprising $\approx60\%$ of the total input, carry image-specific meaning. Furthermore, using a targeted patch-compression benchmark, we demonstrate that these alive tokens already encode rich, fine-grained cues (e.g., objects, colors, and OCR) prior to entering the LLM. Internal visual computations (such as visual attention and feed-forward networks) are redundant for most standard tasks. For the small subset of highly vision-centric tasks that actually benefit from internal processing, we reveal that alive tokens naturally align with intermediate LLM layers rather than the initial embedding space, indicating that shallow-layer processing is unnecessary and that direct mid-layer injection is both sufficient. Ultimately, our findings provide a unified mechanistic view of visual token processing, paving the way for more efficient and interpretable MLLM architectures through selective token pruning, minimized visual computation, and mid-layer injection. The code is released at: https://github.com/EIT-NLP/EmbedLens.

Related papers

• LatentLens: Revealing Highly Interpretable Visual Tokens in LLMs [40.11215282864732]
  We introduce LatentLens, a novel approach for mapping latent representations to descriptions in natural language.<n>We evaluate this method on 10 different Vision-Language Model (VLM) models.<n>We show that the descriptions produced by LatentLens are semantically meaningful and provide more fine-grained interpretations for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T02:33:07Z)
• $\mathcal{V}isi\mathcal{P}runer$: Decoding Discontinuous Cross-Modal Dynamics for Efficient Multimodal LLMs [26.779915891040236]
  We propose emphVisiPruner, a training-free pruning framework that reduces up to 99% of vision-related attention computations and 53.9% of FLOPs on LLaVA-v1.5 7B.<n>Our insights further provide actionable guidelines for training efficient MLLMs by aligning model architecture with its intrinsic layer-wise processing dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T06:40:17Z)
• Where MLLMs Attend and What They Rely On: Explaining Autoregressive Token Generation [59.40886078302025]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in aligning visual inputs with natural language outputs.<n>Yet, the extent to which generated tokens depend on visual modalities remains poorly understood.<n>We present a lightweight black-box framework for explaining autoregressive token generation in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T15:38:42Z)
• CoViPAL: Layer-wise Contextualized Visual Token Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models [75.88232735646018]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) process multimodal inputs consisting of text tokens and vision tokens extracted from images or videos.<n>Existing methods attempt to prune redundant vision tokens, revealing substantial redundancy in visual representations.<n>We propose CoViPAL, a layer-wise contextualized visual token pruning method that employs a Plug-and-Play Pruning Module (PPM) to predict and remove redundant vision tokens before they are processed by the LVLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T07:47:00Z)
• Rethinking Visual Token Reduction in LVLMs under Cross-modal Misalignment [38.04426918886084]
  Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) encode visual inputs as dense sequences of patch-level tokens to capture fine-grained semantics.<n>Previous efforts have explored visual token reduction either prior to or within the large language models (LLMs)<n>We introduce VisionDrop, a training-free, visual-only pruning framework that selects informative visual tokens based on intra-modal (visual-to-visual) attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T14:55:40Z)
• Revisit What You See: Disclose Language Prior in Vision Tokens for LVLM Decoding [6.612630497074871]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong performance across multimodal tasks by integrating visual perception with language understanding.<n>We propose ReVisiT, a training-free decoding method that references vision tokens to guide text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T08:46:55Z)
• Window Token Concatenation for Efficient Visual Large Language Models [59.6094005814282]
  We propose Window Token Concatenation (WiCo) to reduce visual tokens in Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs)<n>WiCo group diverse tokens into one, and thus obscure some fine details.<n>We perform extensive experiments on both coarse- and fine-grained visual understanding tasks based on LLaVA-1.5 and Shikra, showing better performance compared with existing token reduction projectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T02:32:58Z)
• ShortV: Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models by Freezing Visual Tokens in Ineffective Layers [70.38258823378557]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) suffer from high computational costs due to their massive size and the large number of visual tokens.<n>We introduce a novel metric, Layer Contribution (LC), which quantifies the impact of a layer's transformations on visual and text tokens.<n>We propose ShortV, a training-free method that leverages LC to identify ineffective layers, and freezes visual token updates in these layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T07:47:55Z)
• ST$^3$: Accelerating Multimodal Large Language Model by Spatial-Temporal Visual Token Trimming [14.937905258757635]
  $textbfST3$ is a framework designed to accelerate MLLM inference without retraining.<n>$textbfST3$ can be seamlessly integrated into existing pre-trained MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T10:17:29Z)
• Inference Optimal VLMs Need Fewer Visual Tokens and More Parameters [54.01228554126122]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities across various visual understanding and reasoning tasks.<n>To reduce inference costs, one can either downsize the Large Language Models (LLMs) or reduce the number of input tokens needed to represent the image.<n>We take the first steps toward designing token compression algorithms tailored for high-compression settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T18:54:21Z)
• Sparsity Meets Similarity: Leveraging Long-Tail Distribution for Dynamic Optimized Token Representation in Multimodal Large Language Models [6.467840081978855]
  multimodal large language models (MM-LLMs) have achieved significant success in various tasks.<n>Main computational burden arises from processingd text and visual tokens.<n>We propose a dynamic pruning algorithm that identifies the inflection point in the visual CLS token similarity curve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T10:49:10Z)
• Towards Semantic Equivalence of Tokenization in Multimodal LLM [149.11720372278273]
  Vision tokenization is essential for semantic alignment between vision and language.<n>This paper proposes a novel dynamic Semantic-Equivalent Vision Tokenizer (SeTok)<n>SeTok groups visual features into semantic units via a dynamic clustering algorithm.<n>The resulting vision tokens effectively preserve semantic integrity and capture both low-frequency and high-frequency visual features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T17:55:43Z)
• Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference [59.91176945361035]
  We introduce Visual Tokens Withdrawal (VTW), a plug-and-play module to boost MLLMs for rapid inference.<n>VTW strategically withdraws vision tokens at a certain layer, enabling only text tokens to engage in subsequent layers.<n>Our approach can cut computational overhead by over 40% across diverse multimodal tasks while maintaining performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T14:38:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.